Yannan Lin MD, MPH, PhD , Anne C. Hoyt MD , Vladimir G. Manuel MD , Moira Inkelas MPH, PhD , Mehmet Ulvi Saygi Ayvaci PhD , Mehmet Eren Ahsen PhD , William Hsu PhD
{"title":"风险分层筛查:关于每日乳腺 X 射线照相术召回的排期模板模拟研究","authors":"Yannan Lin MD, MPH, PhD , Anne C. Hoyt MD , Vladimir G. Manuel MD , Moira Inkelas MPH, PhD , Mehmet Ulvi Saygi Ayvaci PhD , Mehmet Eren Ahsen PhD , William Hsu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Risk-stratified screening (RSS) scheduling may facilitate more effective use of same-day diagnostic testing for potentially abnormal mammograms, thereby reducing the need for follow-up appointments (“recall”). Our simulation study assessed the potential impact of RSS scheduling on patients recommended for same-day diagnostics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a discrete event simulation to model workflow at a high-volume breast imaging center, incorporating artificial intelligence (AI)-triaged same-day diagnostic workups after screening mammograms. The RSS design sequences patients in the daily screening schedule using cancer risk categories developed from Tyrer-Cuzick and deep learning model scores. We compared recall variance, required hours of operation to accommodate all patients, and patient wait times using traditional (random) and RSS schedules.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The baseline simulation included 60 daily patients, with an average of 42% receiving screening mammograms and 11% (about three patients) being recommended for diagnostic workups. Compared with traditional scheduling, RSS scheduling reduces recall variance by up to 30% (1.98 versus 2.82, <em>P</em> < .05). With same-day diagnostics, RSS scheduling had a modest impact, increasing the number of patients served within normal operating hours by up to 1.3% (55.4 versus 54.7, <em>P</em> < .05), decreasing necessary operational hours by 12 min (10.3 versus 10.5 hours, <em>P</em> < .05), and increasing patient waiting times by an average of 2.4 min (0.24 versus 0.20 hours, <em>P</em> < .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our simulation study suggests that RSS scheduling could reduce recall variance. This approach might enable same-day diagnostics using AI triage by accommodating patients within normal operating hours.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 297-306"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk-Stratified Screening: A Simulation Study of Scheduling Templates on Daily Mammography Recalls\",\"authors\":\"Yannan Lin MD, MPH, PhD , Anne C. Hoyt MD , Vladimir G. Manuel MD , Moira Inkelas MPH, PhD , Mehmet Ulvi Saygi Ayvaci PhD , Mehmet Eren Ahsen PhD , William Hsu PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.12.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Risk-stratified screening (RSS) scheduling may facilitate more effective use of same-day diagnostic testing for potentially abnormal mammograms, thereby reducing the need for follow-up appointments (“recall”). Our simulation study assessed the potential impact of RSS scheduling on patients recommended for same-day diagnostics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used a discrete event simulation to model workflow at a high-volume breast imaging center, incorporating artificial intelligence (AI)-triaged same-day diagnostic workups after screening mammograms. The RSS design sequences patients in the daily screening schedule using cancer risk categories developed from Tyrer-Cuzick and deep learning model scores. We compared recall variance, required hours of operation to accommodate all patients, and patient wait times using traditional (random) and RSS schedules.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The baseline simulation included 60 daily patients, with an average of 42% receiving screening mammograms and 11% (about three patients) being recommended for diagnostic workups. Compared with traditional scheduling, RSS scheduling reduces recall variance by up to 30% (1.98 versus 2.82, <em>P</em> < .05). With same-day diagnostics, RSS scheduling had a modest impact, increasing the number of patients served within normal operating hours by up to 1.3% (55.4 versus 54.7, <em>P</em> < .05), decreasing necessary operational hours by 12 min (10.3 versus 10.5 hours, <em>P</em> < .05), and increasing patient waiting times by an average of 2.4 min (0.24 versus 0.20 hours, <em>P</em> < .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our simulation study suggests that RSS scheduling could reduce recall variance. This approach might enable same-day diagnostics using AI triage by accommodating patients within normal operating hours.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 297-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024010068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024010068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk-Stratified Screening: A Simulation Study of Scheduling Templates on Daily Mammography Recalls
Introduction
Risk-stratified screening (RSS) scheduling may facilitate more effective use of same-day diagnostic testing for potentially abnormal mammograms, thereby reducing the need for follow-up appointments (“recall”). Our simulation study assessed the potential impact of RSS scheduling on patients recommended for same-day diagnostics.
Methods
We used a discrete event simulation to model workflow at a high-volume breast imaging center, incorporating artificial intelligence (AI)-triaged same-day diagnostic workups after screening mammograms. The RSS design sequences patients in the daily screening schedule using cancer risk categories developed from Tyrer-Cuzick and deep learning model scores. We compared recall variance, required hours of operation to accommodate all patients, and patient wait times using traditional (random) and RSS schedules.
Results
The baseline simulation included 60 daily patients, with an average of 42% receiving screening mammograms and 11% (about three patients) being recommended for diagnostic workups. Compared with traditional scheduling, RSS scheduling reduces recall variance by up to 30% (1.98 versus 2.82, P < .05). With same-day diagnostics, RSS scheduling had a modest impact, increasing the number of patients served within normal operating hours by up to 1.3% (55.4 versus 54.7, P < .05), decreasing necessary operational hours by 12 min (10.3 versus 10.5 hours, P < .05), and increasing patient waiting times by an average of 2.4 min (0.24 versus 0.20 hours, P < .05).
Conclusion
Our simulation study suggests that RSS scheduling could reduce recall variance. This approach might enable same-day diagnostics using AI triage by accommodating patients within normal operating hours.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.