利用非对比CT和深度学习人工智能进行肝细胞癌的机会性检测

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chengzhi Peng MBBS , Philip Leung Ho Yu PhD , Jianliang Lu MPhil , Ho Ming Cheng PhD , Xin-Ping Shen MD , Keith Wan-Hang Chiu MD , Wai-Kay Seto MD
{"title":"利用非对比CT和深度学习人工智能进行肝细胞癌的机会性检测","authors":"Chengzhi Peng MBBS ,&nbsp;Philip Leung Ho Yu PhD ,&nbsp;Jianliang Lu MPhil ,&nbsp;Ho Ming Cheng PhD ,&nbsp;Xin-Ping Shen MD ,&nbsp;Keith Wan-Hang Chiu MD ,&nbsp;Wai-Kay Seto MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a heavy global disease burden; early diagnosis is critical to improve outcomes. Opportunistic screening—the use of imaging data acquired for other clinical indications for disease detection—as well as the role of noncontrast CT have been poorly investigated in the context of HCC. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm for efficient and accurate HCC detection using solely noncontrast CTs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 3-D convolutional block attention module (CABM) model was developed and trained on noncontrast multiphasic CT scans. HCC was diagnosed following American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines and confirmed via 12-month clinical composite reference standard. CT observations were reviewed by radiologists; observations in at-risk patients were annotated via the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. Internal validation, independent external testing, and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model performance and generalizability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all, 2,223 patients were included. The CBAM model achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.807 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.772-0.841) on the internal validation cohort, comparable to radiological interpretation at 0.851 (95% CI 0.820-0.882). Among at-risk patients, cases with definite HCC outcomes, indeterminate scans, and scans with small lesions &lt; 2 cm in size, the model attained AUCs of 0.769 (95% CI 0.721-0.817), 0.815 (95% CI 0.778-0.853), 0.769 (95% CI 0.704-0.834), and 0.773 (95% CI 0.692-0.854). On external testing cohort with 584 patients, the CBAM model achieved an AUC of 0.789 (95% CI 0.750-0.827).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The CBAM model achieved a diagnostic accuracy comparable to radiological interpretation during internal validation. Artificial intelligence analysis of noncontrast CTs has a potential role in HCC opportunistic screening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 249-259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunistic Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Noncontrast CT and Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Chengzhi Peng MBBS ,&nbsp;Philip Leung Ho Yu PhD ,&nbsp;Jianliang Lu MPhil ,&nbsp;Ho Ming Cheng PhD ,&nbsp;Xin-Ping Shen MD ,&nbsp;Keith Wan-Hang Chiu MD ,&nbsp;Wai-Kay Seto MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.12.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a heavy global disease burden; early diagnosis is critical to improve outcomes. Opportunistic screening—the use of imaging data acquired for other clinical indications for disease detection—as well as the role of noncontrast CT have been poorly investigated in the context of HCC. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm for efficient and accurate HCC detection using solely noncontrast CTs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 3-D convolutional block attention module (CABM) model was developed and trained on noncontrast multiphasic CT scans. HCC was diagnosed following American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines and confirmed via 12-month clinical composite reference standard. CT observations were reviewed by radiologists; observations in at-risk patients were annotated via the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. Internal validation, independent external testing, and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model performance and generalizability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all, 2,223 patients were included. The CBAM model achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.807 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.772-0.841) on the internal validation cohort, comparable to radiological interpretation at 0.851 (95% CI 0.820-0.882). Among at-risk patients, cases with definite HCC outcomes, indeterminate scans, and scans with small lesions &lt; 2 cm in size, the model attained AUCs of 0.769 (95% CI 0.721-0.817), 0.815 (95% CI 0.778-0.853), 0.769 (95% CI 0.704-0.834), and 0.773 (95% CI 0.692-0.854). On external testing cohort with 584 patients, the CBAM model achieved an AUC of 0.789 (95% CI 0.750-0.827).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The CBAM model achieved a diagnostic accuracy comparable to radiological interpretation during internal validation. Artificial intelligence analysis of noncontrast CTs has a potential role in HCC opportunistic screening.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 249-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154614402401007X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154614402401007X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)是一个全球性的疾病负担;早期诊断对改善预后至关重要。在HCC的背景下,机会性筛查(利用获得的成像数据进行其他临床指征的疾病检测)以及非对比CT的作用的研究很少。我们的目标是开发一种人工智能算法,用于仅使用非对比ct有效准确地检测HCC。方法建立三维卷积块注意模块(CABM)模型,并对其进行非对比多相CT扫描训练。根据美国肝病研究协会指南诊断HCC,并通过12个月临床综合参考标准确诊。CT观察结果由放射科医生审查;高危患者的观察结果通过肝脏影像学报告和数据系统进行注释。通过内部验证、独立的外部测试和敏感性分析来评估模型的性能和通用性。结果共纳入2223例患者。在内部验证队列中,CBAM模型的受试者工作曲线下面积(AUC)为0.807(95%可信区间[CI] 0.772-0.841),而放射学解释为0.851(95%可信区间[CI] 0.820-0.882)。在高危患者中,有明确HCC结局的病例,不确定的扫描和小病变的扫描<;在尺寸为2 cm时,模型的auc分别为0.769 (95% CI 0.721-0.817)、0.815 (95% CI 0.778-0.853)、0.769 (95% CI 0.704-0.834)和0.773 (95% CI 0.692-0.854)。在584例患者的外部测试队列中,CBAM模型的AUC为0.789 (95% CI 0.750-0.827)。CBAM模型在内部验证期间达到了与放射学解释相当的诊断准确性。非对比ct的人工智能分析在HCC机会筛查中具有潜在的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opportunistic Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Noncontrast CT and Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence

Objective

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a heavy global disease burden; early diagnosis is critical to improve outcomes. Opportunistic screening—the use of imaging data acquired for other clinical indications for disease detection—as well as the role of noncontrast CT have been poorly investigated in the context of HCC. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm for efficient and accurate HCC detection using solely noncontrast CTs.

Methods

A 3-D convolutional block attention module (CABM) model was developed and trained on noncontrast multiphasic CT scans. HCC was diagnosed following American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines and confirmed via 12-month clinical composite reference standard. CT observations were reviewed by radiologists; observations in at-risk patients were annotated via the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System. Internal validation, independent external testing, and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model performance and generalizability.

Results

In all, 2,223 patients were included. The CBAM model achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.807 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.772-0.841) on the internal validation cohort, comparable to radiological interpretation at 0.851 (95% CI 0.820-0.882). Among at-risk patients, cases with definite HCC outcomes, indeterminate scans, and scans with small lesions < 2 cm in size, the model attained AUCs of 0.769 (95% CI 0.721-0.817), 0.815 (95% CI 0.778-0.853), 0.769 (95% CI 0.704-0.834), and 0.773 (95% CI 0.692-0.854). On external testing cohort with 584 patients, the CBAM model achieved an AUC of 0.789 (95% CI 0.750-0.827).

Discussion

The CBAM model achieved a diagnostic accuracy comparable to radiological interpretation during internal validation. Artificial intelligence analysis of noncontrast CTs has a potential role in HCC opportunistic screening.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.90%
发文量
312
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信