微创结直肠手术后鞘内阿片类药物用于术后镇痛的前瞻性随机剂量研究

Patrice A. Vinsard MD , Josef Pleticha MD , Emily E. Sharpe MD , Jason K. Panchamia DO , David A. Olsen MD , Hans P. Sviggum MD , Sherief F. Shawki MB, MD , Kevin T. Behm MD , David W. Larson MD, MBA , Allison M. LeMahieu MS , Adam D. Niesen MD , Adam W. Amundson MD
{"title":"微创结直肠手术后鞘内阿片类药物用于术后镇痛的前瞻性随机剂量研究","authors":"Patrice A. Vinsard MD ,&nbsp;Josef Pleticha MD ,&nbsp;Emily E. Sharpe MD ,&nbsp;Jason K. Panchamia DO ,&nbsp;David A. Olsen MD ,&nbsp;Hans P. Sviggum MD ,&nbsp;Sherief F. Shawki MB, MD ,&nbsp;Kevin T. Behm MD ,&nbsp;David W. Larson MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Allison M. LeMahieu MS ,&nbsp;Adam D. Niesen MD ,&nbsp;Adam W. Amundson MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the optimal dose of intrathecal morphine and hydromorphone in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal operation for postoperative analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>The study was a double-blinded clinical dosing trial that randomized patients to intrathecal morphine or hydromorphone from March 12, 2021, to February 17, 2023. Intrathecal dosing was determined by a sequential up-down method using a biased-coin design. Doses of the subsequent patients were stepped up or down based on the success or failure of the previous dose. The primary outcome was the dose effective in 90% of patients (ED<sub>90</sub>) to achieve numeric rating pain scores ≤4 with postoperative opioid requirements ≤15 oral morphine equivalent at 12 hours.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty patients completed the study with 40 patients in each group. The ED<sub>90</sub> for intrathecal morphine and hydromorphone could not be determined for the examined dose ranges. The ED<sub>50</sub> for morphine was 100 mcg and for hydromorphone was 75 mcg. Morphine median (interquartile range [IQR]) numeric rating scale scores was 3.0 (1.5-4.5) at 12 hours and 3.0 (2.0-4.0) at 24 hours, whereas hydromorphone median (IQR) numeric rating scale were 3.0 (1.5-5.0) at 12 hours and 3.0 (2.0-5.0) at 24 hours. As the dosage of hydromorphone increased, moderate to severe pruritus increased (<em>P</em>=.009).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study could not establish an ED<sub>90</sub> for IT dosing for minimally invasive colorectal surgical patients. However, we did determine the ED<sub>50</sub> for both agents. No serious adverse events were observed throughout the study duration.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div><span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: NCT04752033</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 100600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Randomized Dose-Finding Study of Intrathecal Opioids for Postoperative Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Colorectal Operation\",\"authors\":\"Patrice A. Vinsard MD ,&nbsp;Josef Pleticha MD ,&nbsp;Emily E. Sharpe MD ,&nbsp;Jason K. Panchamia DO ,&nbsp;David A. Olsen MD ,&nbsp;Hans P. Sviggum MD ,&nbsp;Sherief F. Shawki MB, MD ,&nbsp;Kevin T. Behm MD ,&nbsp;David W. Larson MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Allison M. LeMahieu MS ,&nbsp;Adam D. Niesen MD ,&nbsp;Adam W. Amundson MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the optimal dose of intrathecal morphine and hydromorphone in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal operation for postoperative analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><div>The study was a double-blinded clinical dosing trial that randomized patients to intrathecal morphine or hydromorphone from March 12, 2021, to February 17, 2023. Intrathecal dosing was determined by a sequential up-down method using a biased-coin design. Doses of the subsequent patients were stepped up or down based on the success or failure of the previous dose. The primary outcome was the dose effective in 90% of patients (ED<sub>90</sub>) to achieve numeric rating pain scores ≤4 with postoperative opioid requirements ≤15 oral morphine equivalent at 12 hours.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty patients completed the study with 40 patients in each group. The ED<sub>90</sub> for intrathecal morphine and hydromorphone could not be determined for the examined dose ranges. The ED<sub>50</sub> for morphine was 100 mcg and for hydromorphone was 75 mcg. Morphine median (interquartile range [IQR]) numeric rating scale scores was 3.0 (1.5-4.5) at 12 hours and 3.0 (2.0-4.0) at 24 hours, whereas hydromorphone median (IQR) numeric rating scale were 3.0 (1.5-5.0) at 12 hours and 3.0 (2.0-5.0) at 24 hours. As the dosage of hydromorphone increased, moderate to severe pruritus increased (<em>P</em>=.009).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study could not establish an ED<sub>90</sub> for IT dosing for minimally invasive colorectal surgical patients. However, we did determine the ED<sub>50</sub> for both agents. No serious adverse events were observed throughout the study duration.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div><span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> Identifier: NCT04752033</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨结肠直肠癌微创手术患者鞘内注射吗啡和氢吗啡酮用于术后镇痛的最佳剂量。患者和方法该研究是一项双盲临床给药试验,在2021年3月12日至2023年2月17日期间,将患者随机分配给鞘内吗啡或氢吗啡酮。鞘内给药采用顺序上下法,采用偏置硬币设计。后续患者的剂量根据前一次剂量的成功或失败而增加或减少。主要终点是90%患者的剂量有效(ED90)达到数值分级疼痛评分≤4,术后12小时阿片类药物需要量≤15口服吗啡当量。结果80例患者完成研究,每组40例。鞘内吗啡和氢吗啡酮的ED90在检查剂量范围内无法测定。吗啡的ED50为100微克,氢吗啡酮为75微克。吗啡数值评定量表得分中位数(四分位间距[IQR])在12小时为3.0(1.5-4.5),24小时为3.0(2.0-4.0),氢吗啡酮数值评定量表得分中位数(IQR)在12小时为3.0(1.5-5.0),24小时为3.0(2.0-5.0)。随着氢吗啡酮用量的增加,中、重度瘙痒症状增加(P= 0.009)。结论本研究无法建立微创结直肠手术患者IT给药的ED90。然而,我们确实确定了两种药物的ED50。在整个研究期间未观察到严重的不良事件。临床试验注册。gov标识符:NCT04752033
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Prospective Randomized Dose-Finding Study of Intrathecal Opioids for Postoperative Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Colorectal Operation

Objective

To determine the optimal dose of intrathecal morphine and hydromorphone in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal operation for postoperative analgesia.

Patients and Methods

The study was a double-blinded clinical dosing trial that randomized patients to intrathecal morphine or hydromorphone from March 12, 2021, to February 17, 2023. Intrathecal dosing was determined by a sequential up-down method using a biased-coin design. Doses of the subsequent patients were stepped up or down based on the success or failure of the previous dose. The primary outcome was the dose effective in 90% of patients (ED90) to achieve numeric rating pain scores ≤4 with postoperative opioid requirements ≤15 oral morphine equivalent at 12 hours.

Results

Eighty patients completed the study with 40 patients in each group. The ED90 for intrathecal morphine and hydromorphone could not be determined for the examined dose ranges. The ED50 for morphine was 100 mcg and for hydromorphone was 75 mcg. Morphine median (interquartile range [IQR]) numeric rating scale scores was 3.0 (1.5-4.5) at 12 hours and 3.0 (2.0-4.0) at 24 hours, whereas hydromorphone median (IQR) numeric rating scale were 3.0 (1.5-5.0) at 12 hours and 3.0 (2.0-5.0) at 24 hours. As the dosage of hydromorphone increased, moderate to severe pruritus increased (P=.009).

Conclusion

The study could not establish an ED90 for IT dosing for minimally invasive colorectal surgical patients. However, we did determine the ED50 for both agents. No serious adverse events were observed throughout the study duration.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04752033
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信