Evaluation of first-trimester ultrasound screening strategy for fetal congenital heart disease.
Objective: To assess the performance of a standardized first-trimester ultrasound screening strategy for fetal congenital heart disease (CHD).
Methods: This was a large retrospective study involving 74 839 consecutive mixed-risk pregnancies (77 396 fetuses). Routine ultrasound scans at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation were performed in a single center from January 2015 to June 2023. All fetuses were examined using a predefined standardized ultrasound scanning strategy with adjustment of imaging parameters, which included assessment of the fetal heart. The ultrasound results (e.g. extracardiac congenital malformations), ultrasound markers (e.g. nuchal translucency thickening, reversed a-wave in the ductus venosus and tricuspid regurgitation), follow-up, genetic tests and diagnostic results were recorded and analyzed.
Results: In total, there were 831 cases of CHD, with an incidence of 1.07% (831/77 396). In the first-trimester scan, 590 fetuses were diagnosed with CHD, but four were confirmed as normal in later examinations. In addition, 245 cases were missed. The detection rate was 70.52%, with a sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate and false-negative rate of 70.52%, 99.99%, 0.01% and 29.48%, respectively. In fetuses with negative ultrasound markers and no extracardiac malformations, the detection rate of CHD was 45.79% (185/404). There were 281 cases that underwent karyotyping and chromosomal microarray (245 fetuses) or whole-exome sequencing (36 fetuses). In total, 38.79% (109/281) had a positive genetic test result. There were 273/831 CHD cases associated with extracardiac malformations. The abnormal image patterns and abnormal features of each view in the scanning strategy were summarized.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.