与ATM、CHEK2或PALB2致病变异有关的乳腺癌、结直肠癌和胰腺癌死亡率。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1200/JCO-24-02442
Christine M Veenstra, Paul Abrahamse, Ann S Hamilton, Kevin C Ward, Scarlett L Gomez, Lihua Liu, Steven J Katz, Timothy P Hofer, Allison W Kurian
{"title":"与ATM、CHEK2或PALB2致病变异有关的乳腺癌、结直肠癌和胰腺癌死亡率。","authors":"Christine M Veenstra, Paul Abrahamse, Ann S Hamilton, Kevin C Ward, Scarlett L Gomez, Lihua Liu, Steven J Katz, Timothy P Hofer, Allison W Kurian","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oncologists encounter patients with pathogenic variants (PVs) in <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, or <i>PALB2</i>, but little is known about their cancer mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were 20 years or older, diagnosed in 2013-2019 with breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer, and reported to SEER registries in California and Georgia were linked to germline genetic testing results from four clinical laboratories and followed through 2021. Multivariable models of cancer mortality were fit; for each cancer, the reference group was the average hazard across all genetically tested patients with that diagnosis. Each cancer was modeled separately, followed by a single model that interacted the cancer type with all covariates. In addition to fixed effects models, random effects models were used as a regularization approach to reduce overfitting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70,272 tested patients with breast (48,473 estrogen receptor-/progesterone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative; 9,957 HER2-positive; 11,842 triple-negative) cancer, 5,822 with colorectal cancer, and 1,861 with pancreatic cancer were analyzed; the mean follow-up was 3.9 years. Patients with <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, or <i>PALB2</i> PVs had no differences in breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer mortality. Patients with <i>ATM</i> PVs in triple-negative breast cancer appeared to have higher mortality in fixed effects models (hazard ratio [HR], 3.7 [95% CI, 1.8 to 7.8]), but not in random effects models (HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.6]) that reduce overfitting. Patients with <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> PVs had lower triple-negative breast cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.8]). Patients with Lynch syndrome gene PVs had lower colorectal cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.4 to 0.8], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, or <i>PALB2</i> PVs had similar breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer mortality to the average genetically tested patient with their cancer type.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1587-1596"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast, Colorectal, and Pancreatic Cancer Mortality With Pathogenic Variants in <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, or <i>PALB2</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Christine M Veenstra, Paul Abrahamse, Ann S Hamilton, Kevin C Ward, Scarlett L Gomez, Lihua Liu, Steven J Katz, Timothy P Hofer, Allison W Kurian\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-02442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oncologists encounter patients with pathogenic variants (PVs) in <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, or <i>PALB2</i>, but little is known about their cancer mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who were 20 years or older, diagnosed in 2013-2019 with breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer, and reported to SEER registries in California and Georgia were linked to germline genetic testing results from four clinical laboratories and followed through 2021. Multivariable models of cancer mortality were fit; for each cancer, the reference group was the average hazard across all genetically tested patients with that diagnosis. Each cancer was modeled separately, followed by a single model that interacted the cancer type with all covariates. In addition to fixed effects models, random effects models were used as a regularization approach to reduce overfitting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70,272 tested patients with breast (48,473 estrogen receptor-/progesterone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative; 9,957 HER2-positive; 11,842 triple-negative) cancer, 5,822 with colorectal cancer, and 1,861 with pancreatic cancer were analyzed; the mean follow-up was 3.9 years. Patients with <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, or <i>PALB2</i> PVs had no differences in breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer mortality. Patients with <i>ATM</i> PVs in triple-negative breast cancer appeared to have higher mortality in fixed effects models (hazard ratio [HR], 3.7 [95% CI, 1.8 to 7.8]), but not in random effects models (HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.6]) that reduce overfitting. Patients with <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> PVs had lower triple-negative breast cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.8]). Patients with Lynch syndrome gene PVs had lower colorectal cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.4 to 0.8], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with <i>ATM</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, or <i>PALB2</i> PVs had similar breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer mortality to the average genetically tested patient with their cancer type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1587-1596\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02442\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02442","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肿瘤学家遇到ATM, CHEK2或PALB2致病性变异(pv)的患者,但对其癌症死亡率知之甚少。方法:将2013-2019年诊断为乳腺癌、结直肠癌或胰腺癌的20岁及以上患者报告给加利福尼亚州和佐治亚州的SEER登记处,并将其与四个临床实验室的种系基因检测结果相关联,并随访至2021年。拟合癌症死亡率的多变量模型;对于每一种癌症,参照组是所有被诊断出这种癌症的基因检测患者的平均风险。每种癌症都是单独建模的,然后是一个单独的模型,该模型将癌症类型与所有协变量相互作用。除了固定效应模型,随机效应模型被用作正则化方法来减少过拟合。结果:共有70,272例乳腺癌患者(48,473例雌激素受体/孕激素受体阳性,人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)阴性;9957 her2阳性;三阴性癌症11842例,结直肠癌5822例,胰腺癌1861例;平均随访时间为3.9年。ATM、CHEK2或PALB2 pv患者在乳腺癌、结直肠癌或胰腺癌死亡率方面没有差异。在固定效应模型中,三阴性乳腺癌中ATM pv患者的死亡率似乎更高(风险比[HR], 3.7 [95% CI, 1.8至7.8]),但在减少过拟合的随机效应模型中(风险比[HR], 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8至1.6])没有出现更高的死亡率。在两种模型中,BRCA1/2 pv患者的三阴性乳腺癌死亡率较低(固定风险比为0.6 [95% CI, 0.5至0.9],随机风险比为0.7 [95% CI, 0.6至0.8])。在两种模型中,Lynch综合征基因pv患者的结直肠癌死亡率均较低(固定风险比,0.5 [95% CI, 0.4至0.8],随机风险比,0.7 [95% CI, 0.5至0.9])。结论:ATM, CHEK2或PALB2 pv患者的乳腺癌,结直肠癌和胰腺癌死亡率与平均基因检测患者的癌症类型相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast, Colorectal, and Pancreatic Cancer Mortality With Pathogenic Variants in ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2.

Purpose: Oncologists encounter patients with pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2, but little is known about their cancer mortality.

Methods: Patients who were 20 years or older, diagnosed in 2013-2019 with breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer, and reported to SEER registries in California and Georgia were linked to germline genetic testing results from four clinical laboratories and followed through 2021. Multivariable models of cancer mortality were fit; for each cancer, the reference group was the average hazard across all genetically tested patients with that diagnosis. Each cancer was modeled separately, followed by a single model that interacted the cancer type with all covariates. In addition to fixed effects models, random effects models were used as a regularization approach to reduce overfitting.

Results: A total of 70,272 tested patients with breast (48,473 estrogen receptor-/progesterone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative; 9,957 HER2-positive; 11,842 triple-negative) cancer, 5,822 with colorectal cancer, and 1,861 with pancreatic cancer were analyzed; the mean follow-up was 3.9 years. Patients with ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 PVs had no differences in breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer mortality. Patients with ATM PVs in triple-negative breast cancer appeared to have higher mortality in fixed effects models (hazard ratio [HR], 3.7 [95% CI, 1.8 to 7.8]), but not in random effects models (HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.6]) that reduce overfitting. Patients with BRCA1/2 PVs had lower triple-negative breast cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.8]). Patients with Lynch syndrome gene PVs had lower colorectal cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.4 to 0.8], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]).

Conclusion: Patients with ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 PVs had similar breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer mortality to the average genetically tested patient with their cancer type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信