“让那些管理这些暴发的人参与”:利益攸关方对乌干达实施高后果传染病临床管理准则的障碍和促进因素的看法——专题网络分析。

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-02-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001165
Olive Kabajaasi, Stefan Schilling, Mathias Akugizibwe, Peter W Horby, Peter Hart, Louise Sigfrid, Shevin T Jacob
{"title":"“让那些管理这些暴发的人参与”:利益攸关方对乌干达实施高后果传染病临床管理准则的障碍和促进因素的看法——专题网络分析。","authors":"Olive Kabajaasi, Stefan Schilling, Mathias Akugizibwe, Peter W Horby, Peter Hart, Louise Sigfrid, Shevin T Jacob","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prior research highlighting the complexity of clinical management guidelines' (CMGs) implementation during high consequence infectious disease (HCID) outbreaks has suggested that limited access to treatments and equipment and substantial issues regarding availability, inclusivity, quality and applicability hinders the implementation of CMGs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This in-depth case study of Uganda-coincidentally occurring during the 2022 Sudan virus disease outbreak-aimed to explore contextual and supplementary factors which hinder or facilitate CMG development and implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August and December 2022, 43 interviews were conducted with medical personnel, consultant physicians, case managers and Uganda Ministry of Health officials. Interviews were analysed using a thematic network analysis approach to visualise thematic codes in qualitative data and highlight inherent relationships between codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six thematic topics emerged as the main barriers to the implementation of CMGs during HCID outbreaks in Uganda: (1) deficient content and slow updates of CMGs; (2) scarce resources and healthcare disparities; (3) slow dissemination and limited access to guidelines; (4) improvisation of patient care (5) lack of training for healthcare workers (HCWs); and (6) limited pandemic preparedness and response infrastructure. Codes most strongly linked to facilitators and suggestions included: (1) HCW training in CMG implementation; (2) adequate resourcing; (3) involvement of personnel with prior HCID response experience in CMG development and (4) improvements in access to CMGs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By illustrating linkages to resource constraints, healthcare disparities, and limited surveillance and referral infrastructure, our study displays how insufficient training, patchy dissemination and slow updating exacerbate many of the underlying difficulties for CMG implementation in LMIC contexts. Findings offer valuable insights for LMICs to improve HCID outbreak responses and inform implementation of CMGs in future HCID outbreaks, where evidence is often initially limited. Recommendations to enhance CMG implementation are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Involve those who are managing these outbreaks': stakeholders' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical management guidelines for high-consequence infectious diseases in Uganda-a thematic network analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Olive Kabajaasi, Stefan Schilling, Mathias Akugizibwe, Peter W Horby, Peter Hart, Louise Sigfrid, Shevin T Jacob\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prior research highlighting the complexity of clinical management guidelines' (CMGs) implementation during high consequence infectious disease (HCID) outbreaks has suggested that limited access to treatments and equipment and substantial issues regarding availability, inclusivity, quality and applicability hinders the implementation of CMGs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This in-depth case study of Uganda-coincidentally occurring during the 2022 Sudan virus disease outbreak-aimed to explore contextual and supplementary factors which hinder or facilitate CMG development and implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August and December 2022, 43 interviews were conducted with medical personnel, consultant physicians, case managers and Uganda Ministry of Health officials. Interviews were analysed using a thematic network analysis approach to visualise thematic codes in qualitative data and highlight inherent relationships between codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six thematic topics emerged as the main barriers to the implementation of CMGs during HCID outbreaks in Uganda: (1) deficient content and slow updates of CMGs; (2) scarce resources and healthcare disparities; (3) slow dissemination and limited access to guidelines; (4) improvisation of patient care (5) lack of training for healthcare workers (HCWs); and (6) limited pandemic preparedness and response infrastructure. Codes most strongly linked to facilitators and suggestions included: (1) HCW training in CMG implementation; (2) adequate resourcing; (3) involvement of personnel with prior HCID response experience in CMG development and (4) improvements in access to CMGs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By illustrating linkages to resource constraints, healthcare disparities, and limited surveillance and referral infrastructure, our study displays how insufficient training, patchy dissemination and slow updating exacerbate many of the underlying difficulties for CMG implementation in LMIC contexts. Findings offer valuable insights for LMICs to improve HCID outbreak responses and inform implementation of CMGs in future HCID outbreaks, where evidence is often initially limited. Recommendations to enhance CMG implementation are provided.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e001165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11843484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究强调了在高后果传染病(HCID)暴发期间实施临床管理指南(CMGs)的复杂性,表明获得治疗和设备的机会有限以及有关可得性、包容性、质量和适用性的实质性问题阻碍了CMGs在中低收入国家(LMICs)的实施。这项对乌干达的深入案例研究恰好发生在2022年苏丹病毒病暴发期间,旨在探索阻碍或促进CMG发展和实施的背景和补充因素。方法:在2022年8月至12月期间,对医疗人员、顾问医师、病例管理人员和乌干达卫生部官员进行了43次访谈。访谈采用专题网络分析方法进行分析,将定性数据中的专题代码可视化,并突出代码之间的内在关系。结果:在乌干达HCID爆发期间,六个主题成为实施CMGs的主要障碍:(1)CMGs内容不足且更新缓慢;(2)资源稀缺和医疗保健差距;(3)指南传播缓慢,获取途径有限;(4)病人护理的即兴化(5)医护人员缺乏培训;(6)大流行防范和应对基础设施有限。与促进者联系最密切的准则和建议包括:(1)实施CMG的HCW培训;(2)充足的资源;(3)让有HCID应对经验的人员参与CMG的开发;(4)改善对CMG的获取。结论:通过说明资源限制、医疗保健差距以及有限的监测和转诊基础设施之间的联系,我们的研究显示了培训不足、传播不完整和更新缓慢如何加剧了在低收入和中等收入国家实施CMG的许多潜在困难。研究结果为中低收入国家提供了有价值的见解,以改善HCID爆发的应对措施,并为在未来HCID爆发中实施CMGs提供信息,在这些领域,最初的证据往往有限。提出了加强CMG实施的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Involve those who are managing these outbreaks': stakeholders' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical management guidelines for high-consequence infectious diseases in Uganda-a thematic network analysis.

Introduction: Prior research highlighting the complexity of clinical management guidelines' (CMGs) implementation during high consequence infectious disease (HCID) outbreaks has suggested that limited access to treatments and equipment and substantial issues regarding availability, inclusivity, quality and applicability hinders the implementation of CMGs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This in-depth case study of Uganda-coincidentally occurring during the 2022 Sudan virus disease outbreak-aimed to explore contextual and supplementary factors which hinder or facilitate CMG development and implementation.

Methods: Between August and December 2022, 43 interviews were conducted with medical personnel, consultant physicians, case managers and Uganda Ministry of Health officials. Interviews were analysed using a thematic network analysis approach to visualise thematic codes in qualitative data and highlight inherent relationships between codes.

Results: Six thematic topics emerged as the main barriers to the implementation of CMGs during HCID outbreaks in Uganda: (1) deficient content and slow updates of CMGs; (2) scarce resources and healthcare disparities; (3) slow dissemination and limited access to guidelines; (4) improvisation of patient care (5) lack of training for healthcare workers (HCWs); and (6) limited pandemic preparedness and response infrastructure. Codes most strongly linked to facilitators and suggestions included: (1) HCW training in CMG implementation; (2) adequate resourcing; (3) involvement of personnel with prior HCID response experience in CMG development and (4) improvements in access to CMGs.

Conclusions: By illustrating linkages to resource constraints, healthcare disparities, and limited surveillance and referral infrastructure, our study displays how insufficient training, patchy dissemination and slow updating exacerbate many of the underlying difficulties for CMG implementation in LMIC contexts. Findings offer valuable insights for LMICs to improve HCID outbreak responses and inform implementation of CMGs in future HCID outbreaks, where evidence is often initially limited. Recommendations to enhance CMG implementation are provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信