产妇保健自费支出的种族和民族差异。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rebecca A Gourevitch, Jessica L Cohen, Tara Shakley, Katie Camacho Orona, Sung Min Park, Mary Beth Landrum, Meredith B Rosenthal, Mark W Friedberg, Anna D Sinaiko
{"title":"产妇保健自费支出的种族和民族差异。","authors":"Rebecca A Gourevitch, Jessica L Cohen, Tara Shakley, Katie Camacho Orona, Sung Min Park, Mary Beth Landrum, Meredith B Rosenthal, Mark W Friedberg, Anna D Sinaiko","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Rising out-of-pocket costs of maternal health care for people with commercial insurance may affect use of health care and outcomes. There are stark racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes, but little is known about differences in spending.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure differences in out-of-pocket spending for maternity care by race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study used administrative data from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2022, for pregnancies, deliveries, and 42-day postpartum care. Participants were continuously enrolled during pregnancy, delivery, and 42 days post partum (collectively termed maternity episode).</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>The primary characteristic of interest was the birthing person's race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was total out-of-pocket spending during the maternity episode. Out-of-pocket spending was measured separately for the pregnancy period, prenatal services, and delivery, by type of cost sharing, and as a percentage of the median household income in the patient's census tract (using American Community Survey data). Race and ethnicity were measured via self-report and imputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 87 253 maternity episodes among 76 826 unique birthing persons (mean [SD] age, 32.4 [4.7] years; 99.8% female) between 2018 and 2022; among maternity episodes, 8572 birthing persons (9.8%) were Asian, 3331 (3.8%) were Black, 6872 (7.9%) were Hispanic, and 68 478 (78.5%) were White. Mean out-of-pocket spending for the maternity episode was highest among Black birthing people ($2398 [$426]), followed by Hispanic ($2300 [$572]), Asian ($2202 [$603]), and White ($2036 [$1547]) birthing people (P < .001). These differences remained statistically significant after adjusting for health and demographic characteristics. The differences were largest in the prenatal period and for coinsurance payments. Black (1003 [30.1%]) and Hispanic (2302 [33.5%]) birthing people were more likely than Asian (1569 [18.3%]) and White (12 600 [18.4%]) birthing people to be enrolled in plans with high coinsurance, but not plans with high deductibles (3317 [38.7%] for Asian, 1232 [37.0%] for Black, 2350 [34.2%] for Hispanic, and 24 515 [35.8%] for White birthing people).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, differences in out-of-pocket maternity spending among the commercially insured were associated with differences in coinsurance rates. These costs could lead people to forgo needed health care or other basic needs that support health (eg, food or housing). Changes to health plan benefit design could improve equity in out-of-pocket maternity spending and its consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 2","pages":"e245565"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Ethnic Differences in Out-of-Pocket Spending for Maternity Care.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca A Gourevitch, Jessica L Cohen, Tara Shakley, Katie Camacho Orona, Sung Min Park, Mary Beth Landrum, Meredith B Rosenthal, Mark W Friedberg, Anna D Sinaiko\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Rising out-of-pocket costs of maternal health care for people with commercial insurance may affect use of health care and outcomes. There are stark racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes, but little is known about differences in spending.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure differences in out-of-pocket spending for maternity care by race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study used administrative data from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2022, for pregnancies, deliveries, and 42-day postpartum care. Participants were continuously enrolled during pregnancy, delivery, and 42 days post partum (collectively termed maternity episode).</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>The primary characteristic of interest was the birthing person's race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was total out-of-pocket spending during the maternity episode. Out-of-pocket spending was measured separately for the pregnancy period, prenatal services, and delivery, by type of cost sharing, and as a percentage of the median household income in the patient's census tract (using American Community Survey data). Race and ethnicity were measured via self-report and imputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic sample included 87 253 maternity episodes among 76 826 unique birthing persons (mean [SD] age, 32.4 [4.7] years; 99.8% female) between 2018 and 2022; among maternity episodes, 8572 birthing persons (9.8%) were Asian, 3331 (3.8%) were Black, 6872 (7.9%) were Hispanic, and 68 478 (78.5%) were White. Mean out-of-pocket spending for the maternity episode was highest among Black birthing people ($2398 [$426]), followed by Hispanic ($2300 [$572]), Asian ($2202 [$603]), and White ($2036 [$1547]) birthing people (P < .001). These differences remained statistically significant after adjusting for health and demographic characteristics. The differences were largest in the prenatal period and for coinsurance payments. Black (1003 [30.1%]) and Hispanic (2302 [33.5%]) birthing people were more likely than Asian (1569 [18.3%]) and White (12 600 [18.4%]) birthing people to be enrolled in plans with high coinsurance, but not plans with high deductibles (3317 [38.7%] for Asian, 1232 [37.0%] for Black, 2350 [34.2%] for Hispanic, and 24 515 [35.8%] for White birthing people).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, differences in out-of-pocket maternity spending among the commercially insured were associated with differences in coinsurance rates. These costs could lead people to forgo needed health care or other basic needs that support health (eg, food or housing). Changes to health plan benefit design could improve equity in out-of-pocket maternity spending and its consequences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"e245565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11871542/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:对有商业保险的人来说,产妇保健的自付费用不断上升,可能会影响保健的使用和结果。结果上存在明显的种族和民族差异,但人们对支出上的差异知之甚少。目的:衡量不同种族和民族的产妇自付医疗费用的差异。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性横断面研究使用了马萨诸塞州蓝十字蓝盾公司2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间的怀孕、分娩和产后42天护理的行政数据。参与者在怀孕、分娩和产后42天(统称为产妇期)期间连续登记。暴露:兴趣的主要特征是分娩者的种族和民族。主要结局和措施:主要结局是在分娩期间的总自付费用。自费支出分别用于妊娠期、产前服务和分娩,按费用分担类型和患者人口普查区家庭收入中位数的百分比(使用美国社区调查数据)。种族和民族是通过自我报告和归因来衡量的。结果:分析样本包括76 826例独特分娩者中87 253次产妇发作(平均[SD]年龄32.4[4.7]岁;(99.8%为女性);在分娩期间,亚裔8572人(9.8%),黑人3331人(3.8%),西班牙裔6872人(7.9%),白人68 478人(78.5%)。分娩期间的平均自付费用在黑人产妇中最高(2398美元[426美元]),其次是西班牙裔(2300美元[572美元]),亚洲人(2202美元[603美元])和白人(2036美元[1547美元])。(P结论和相关性:在本研究中,商业保险产妇自付费用的差异与共同保险费率的差异有关。这些费用可能导致人们放弃必要的医疗保健或支持健康的其他基本需求(例如食物或住房)。健康计划福利设计的改变可以改善自付产假费用及其后果的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Out-of-Pocket Spending for Maternity Care.

Importance: Rising out-of-pocket costs of maternal health care for people with commercial insurance may affect use of health care and outcomes. There are stark racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes, but little is known about differences in spending.

Objective: To measure differences in out-of-pocket spending for maternity care by race and ethnicity.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study used administrative data from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2022, for pregnancies, deliveries, and 42-day postpartum care. Participants were continuously enrolled during pregnancy, delivery, and 42 days post partum (collectively termed maternity episode).

Exposures: The primary characteristic of interest was the birthing person's race and ethnicity.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was total out-of-pocket spending during the maternity episode. Out-of-pocket spending was measured separately for the pregnancy period, prenatal services, and delivery, by type of cost sharing, and as a percentage of the median household income in the patient's census tract (using American Community Survey data). Race and ethnicity were measured via self-report and imputation.

Results: The analytic sample included 87 253 maternity episodes among 76 826 unique birthing persons (mean [SD] age, 32.4 [4.7] years; 99.8% female) between 2018 and 2022; among maternity episodes, 8572 birthing persons (9.8%) were Asian, 3331 (3.8%) were Black, 6872 (7.9%) were Hispanic, and 68 478 (78.5%) were White. Mean out-of-pocket spending for the maternity episode was highest among Black birthing people ($2398 [$426]), followed by Hispanic ($2300 [$572]), Asian ($2202 [$603]), and White ($2036 [$1547]) birthing people (P < .001). These differences remained statistically significant after adjusting for health and demographic characteristics. The differences were largest in the prenatal period and for coinsurance payments. Black (1003 [30.1%]) and Hispanic (2302 [33.5%]) birthing people were more likely than Asian (1569 [18.3%]) and White (12 600 [18.4%]) birthing people to be enrolled in plans with high coinsurance, but not plans with high deductibles (3317 [38.7%] for Asian, 1232 [37.0%] for Black, 2350 [34.2%] for Hispanic, and 24 515 [35.8%] for White birthing people).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, differences in out-of-pocket maternity spending among the commercially insured were associated with differences in coinsurance rates. These costs could lead people to forgo needed health care or other basic needs that support health (eg, food or housing). Changes to health plan benefit design could improve equity in out-of-pocket maternity spending and its consequences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信