Juno Coan-Brill, Jodi Friesen, Jessica Kay, Frances Aileen Costigan, Tom Chau, Johanna Geytenbeek, Kristine Stadskleiv, Beata Batorowicz, Dayle McCauley, Sarah Hopmans, Danijela Grahovac, Gail Teachman, Barbara Jane Cunningham
{"title":"\"My child is completely underestimated\": Canadian parents' perspectives on implementing an accessible language comprehension assessment for non-speaking children with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Juno Coan-Brill, Jodi Friesen, Jessica Kay, Frances Aileen Costigan, Tom Chau, Johanna Geytenbeek, Kristine Stadskleiv, Beata Batorowicz, Dayle McCauley, Sarah Hopmans, Danijela Grahovac, Gail Teachman, Barbara Jane Cunningham","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2468844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Reliable assessment of language comprehension is difficult for children with significant speech and motor limitations. The Computer-Based instrument for Low motor Language Testing (C-BiLLT) was designed for children with cerebral palsy (CP) and speech and motor limitations. A Canadian English version (C-BiLLT-CAN) has been validated. However, early investigation identified feasibility challenges necessitating further exploration. This study aimed to understand parents' perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing the C-BiLLT-CAN in the Canadian clinical context.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seven focus groups were conducted synchronously online with 16 parents from five Canadian provinces/territories. Transcripts were analyzed using semi-deductive thematic analysis, framing results within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parents unanimously expressed interest in making the C-BiLLT-CAN clinically available. Facilitators and barriers were discussed under five themes. Key facilitators included the unique design, standardized nature, and potential flexibility of the C-BiLLT-CAN. Barriers involved the inability to accommodate all children, the potential for unintended assessment impacts, and clinics' readiness and willingness to prioritize implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study contributes new knowledge surrounding the assessment needs of parents of children with CP and speech and motor limitations. Alongside findings from a parallel clinician study, results will inform adaptations to the C-BiLLT-CAN to facilitate implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2468844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
"My child is completely underestimated": Canadian parents' perspectives on implementing an accessible language comprehension assessment for non-speaking children with cerebral palsy.
Purpose: Reliable assessment of language comprehension is difficult for children with significant speech and motor limitations. The Computer-Based instrument for Low motor Language Testing (C-BiLLT) was designed for children with cerebral palsy (CP) and speech and motor limitations. A Canadian English version (C-BiLLT-CAN) has been validated. However, early investigation identified feasibility challenges necessitating further exploration. This study aimed to understand parents' perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing the C-BiLLT-CAN in the Canadian clinical context.
Materials and methods: Seven focus groups were conducted synchronously online with 16 parents from five Canadian provinces/territories. Transcripts were analyzed using semi-deductive thematic analysis, framing results within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Results: Parents unanimously expressed interest in making the C-BiLLT-CAN clinically available. Facilitators and barriers were discussed under five themes. Key facilitators included the unique design, standardized nature, and potential flexibility of the C-BiLLT-CAN. Barriers involved the inability to accommodate all children, the potential for unintended assessment impacts, and clinics' readiness and willingness to prioritize implementation.
Conclusions: This study contributes new knowledge surrounding the assessment needs of parents of children with CP and speech and motor limitations. Alongside findings from a parallel clinician study, results will inform adaptations to the C-BiLLT-CAN to facilitate implementation.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.