IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Michelle E Wormley, Chris Sebelski, Jason Cook, Gail Jensen, Melissa M Tovin
{"title":"Current state of entry-level physical therapy qualitative research methods curricula in the United States: A faculty survey.","authors":"Michelle E Wormley, Chris Sebelski, Jason Cook, Gail Jensen, Melissa M Tovin","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2471409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Qualitative research methods in healthcare delve into the nuanced complexities of health professions work, seeking to comprehend the contextual and interpretive dimensions of patient, caregiver, and provider perspectives and experiences. Qualitative research is an essential contribution to evidence-based and evidence-informed practice, and therefore foundational for practice across all health professions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine the breadth and depth of curricular content, delivery models, instructional strategies, and resources related to qualitative research methods in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional design, an online survey was developed, piloted, and emailed to 256 Commission for the Accreditation of Physical Therapy Education accredited DPT programs. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and chi-square statistics were completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate was 31.6%. Respondents reported a mean of 5 instructional hours of qualitative research content, ranging from 0 to 12 hours. Analysis revealed a significant difference in contact hours (<i>p</i> = .026) between faculty reporting no expertise (2.7 hours) and high expertise (7.5 hours). Qualitative research content was primarily located early in the curriculum (76%) and in a stand-alone course (70%), with wide variability in intended learning outcomes, activities, and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the critical importance that clinicians understand and apply qualitative and quantitative findings as part of evidence informed practice, this study highlights the need for building resources and faculty capacity to integrate qualitative methods of education in DPT curricula. Findings may inform the development of curriculum models, guidelines, and DPT learner competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2471409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:医疗保健领域的定性研究方法深入探讨了医疗保健专业工作的细微复杂性,试图理解患者、护理人员和医疗服务提供者的观点和经验的背景和解释维度。目的:本研究旨在考察美国物理治疗博士(DPT)课程中与定性研究方法相关的课程内容、授课模式、教学策略和资源的广度和深度:在此横断面设计中,我们开发、试用了一份在线调查问卷,并通过电子邮件发送给 256 个物理治疗教育认证委员会认可的 DPT 项目。调查采用了描述性统计、独立样本 t 检验、单因素方差分析和卡方统计等方法:总回复率为 31.6%。受访者报告的定性研究内容平均授课时数为 5 小时,从 0 小时到 12 小时不等。分析表明,无专业知识(2.7 小时)和有专业知识(7.5 小时)的教师在接触学时上存在明显差异(p = .026)。定性研究内容主要位于课程的早期(76%)和独立课程中(70%),在预期学习成果、活动和资源方面存在很大差异:鉴于临床医生理解并应用定性和定量研究结果作为循证实践的一部分至关重要,本研究强调了在将定性教育方法纳入 DPT 课程方面建设资源和师资能力的必要性。研究结果可为课程模型、指南和 DPT 学员能力的开发提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current state of entry-level physical therapy qualitative research methods curricula in the United States: A faculty survey.

Introduction: Qualitative research methods in healthcare delve into the nuanced complexities of health professions work, seeking to comprehend the contextual and interpretive dimensions of patient, caregiver, and provider perspectives and experiences. Qualitative research is an essential contribution to evidence-based and evidence-informed practice, and therefore foundational for practice across all health professions.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the breadth and depth of curricular content, delivery models, instructional strategies, and resources related to qualitative research methods in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs in the United States.

Methods: In this cross-sectional design, an online survey was developed, piloted, and emailed to 256 Commission for the Accreditation of Physical Therapy Education accredited DPT programs. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and chi-square statistics were completed.

Results: The overall response rate was 31.6%. Respondents reported a mean of 5 instructional hours of qualitative research content, ranging from 0 to 12 hours. Analysis revealed a significant difference in contact hours (p = .026) between faculty reporting no expertise (2.7 hours) and high expertise (7.5 hours). Qualitative research content was primarily located early in the curriculum (76%) and in a stand-alone course (70%), with wide variability in intended learning outcomes, activities, and resources.

Conclusion: Given the critical importance that clinicians understand and apply qualitative and quantitative findings as part of evidence informed practice, this study highlights the need for building resources and faculty capacity to integrate qualitative methods of education in DPT curricula. Findings may inform the development of curriculum models, guidelines, and DPT learner competencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信