腹内高血压不像以前那么常见了:一项先导步骤楔形试验。

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2478/jccm-2025-0002
Shane Smith, Fran Priestap, Neil Parry, Robert Arntfield, Patrick Murphy, Kelly Vogt, Ian Ball
{"title":"腹内高血压不像以前那么常见了:一项先导步骤楔形试验。","authors":"Shane Smith, Fran Priestap, Neil Parry, Robert Arntfield, Patrick Murphy, Kelly Vogt, Ian Ball","doi":"10.2478/jccm-2025-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is a pilot study to determine the feasibility of a multicentre stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of implementing the 2013 World Society of the Intraabdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) guidelines as an intervention to treat intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre before-and-after trial, with an observation / baseline period of 3 months followed by a 9-month intervention period.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A 35 bed medical-surgical-trauma intensive care unit in a tertiary level, Canadian hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Recruitment from consecutively admitted adult intensive care unit patients.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the intervention period, treatment teams were prompted to implement WSACS interventions in all patients diagnosed with IAH.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>129 patients were recruited, 59 during the observation period and 70 during the intervention period. Only 17.0% and 12.9%, respectively, met diagnostic criteria for IAH. Many recruited patients did not have intraabdominal pressures measured regularly per study protocol. There was no difference in ICU mortality for patients in either cohort or between those with and without IAH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of IAH in our patient population has decreased significantly since 2015. This is likely due to a significant change in routine care of critically ill patients, especially with respect to judicious goal-directed fluid resuscitation. Patient recruitment and protocol adherence in this study were low, exacerbated by other staffing and logistical pressures during the study period. We conclude that a larger multicentre trial is unlikely to yield evidence of a detectable treatment effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraabdominal hypertension is less common than it used to be: A pilot step wedge trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shane Smith, Fran Priestap, Neil Parry, Robert Arntfield, Patrick Murphy, Kelly Vogt, Ian Ball\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jccm-2025-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This is a pilot study to determine the feasibility of a multicentre stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of implementing the 2013 World Society of the Intraabdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) guidelines as an intervention to treat intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre before-and-after trial, with an observation / baseline period of 3 months followed by a 9-month intervention period.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A 35 bed medical-surgical-trauma intensive care unit in a tertiary level, Canadian hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Recruitment from consecutively admitted adult intensive care unit patients.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the intervention period, treatment teams were prompted to implement WSACS interventions in all patients diagnosed with IAH.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>129 patients were recruited, 59 during the observation period and 70 during the intervention period. Only 17.0% and 12.9%, respectively, met diagnostic criteria for IAH. Many recruited patients did not have intraabdominal pressures measured regularly per study protocol. There was no difference in ICU mortality for patients in either cohort or between those with and without IAH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The incidence of IAH in our patient population has decreased significantly since 2015. This is likely due to a significant change in routine care of critically ill patients, especially with respect to judicious goal-directed fluid resuscitation. Patient recruitment and protocol adherence in this study were low, exacerbated by other staffing and logistical pressures during the study period. We conclude that a larger multicentre trial is unlikely to yield evidence of a detectable treatment effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"95-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864065/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这是一项试点研究,旨在确定实施2013年世界腹内隔室综合征协会(WSACS)指南作为治疗危重患者腹内高压(IAH)和腹内隔室综合征(ACS)的干预措施的多中心阶梯楔形聚类随机试验的可行性。设计:单中心前后试验,观察/基线期为3个月,干预期为9个月。环境:加拿大一家三级医院的35张病床的内科-外科-创伤重症监护室。患者:从连续住院的成人重症监护病房患者中招募。干预:在干预期间,对所有确诊为IAH的患者,提示各治疗小组实施WSACS干预。测量方法及主要结果:共纳入患者129例,其中观察期59例,干预期70例。分别只有17.0%和12.9%的患者符合IAH的诊断标准。许多入选的患者没有按照研究方案定期测量腹内压。两组患者的ICU死亡率以及有无IAH患者之间的死亡率均无差异。结论:自2015年以来,我们的患者人群中IAH的发生率明显下降。这可能是由于危重病人的常规护理发生了重大变化,特别是在明智的目标导向液体复苏方面。在这项研究中,患者招募和方案依从性较低,研究期间其他人员配备和后勤压力加剧了这一点。我们的结论是,一个更大的多中心试验不太可能产生可检测治疗效果的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraabdominal hypertension is less common than it used to be: A pilot step wedge trial.

Objective: This is a pilot study to determine the feasibility of a multicentre stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of implementing the 2013 World Society of the Intraabdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) guidelines as an intervention to treat intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in critically ill patients.

Design: Single-centre before-and-after trial, with an observation / baseline period of 3 months followed by a 9-month intervention period.

Setting: A 35 bed medical-surgical-trauma intensive care unit in a tertiary level, Canadian hospital.

Patients: Recruitment from consecutively admitted adult intensive care unit patients.

Intervention: In the intervention period, treatment teams were prompted to implement WSACS interventions in all patients diagnosed with IAH.

Measurements and main results: 129 patients were recruited, 59 during the observation period and 70 during the intervention period. Only 17.0% and 12.9%, respectively, met diagnostic criteria for IAH. Many recruited patients did not have intraabdominal pressures measured regularly per study protocol. There was no difference in ICU mortality for patients in either cohort or between those with and without IAH.

Conclusions: The incidence of IAH in our patient population has decreased significantly since 2015. This is likely due to a significant change in routine care of critically ill patients, especially with respect to judicious goal-directed fluid resuscitation. Patient recruitment and protocol adherence in this study were low, exacerbated by other staffing and logistical pressures during the study period. We conclude that a larger multicentre trial is unlikely to yield evidence of a detectable treatment effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Journal of Critical Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信