IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2478/jccm-2025-0004
Sarwat Rasheed, Sidra Javed, Thanyat Rasheed, Shaiza Farman, Elisha Shalim
{"title":"Hypercapnia outcome in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilator: A retrospective observational cohort.","authors":"Sarwat Rasheed, Sidra Javed, Thanyat Rasheed, Shaiza Farman, Elisha Shalim","doi":"10.2478/jccm-2025-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by progressive lung inflammation which leads to increased dead space that can cause hypercapnia and can increase the risk of patient morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to improve ARDS patient outcomes provision of protective lung ventilation has been shown to improve patient mortality but increases the incidence of hypercapnia. Therefore, the role of carbon dioxide in ARDS remains contradicted by conflicted evidence. This study aims to examine this conflicting relationship between hyper-capnia and mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study. The data was collected from the medical records of the patients admitted with COVID-19 ARDS in Sindh Infectious Disease Hospital & Research Centre (SIDH & RC) from August 2020 to August 2022 and who received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. The patients were grouped into severe and no severe hypercapnia groups based on their arterial blood carbon dioxide levels (PaCO2). To understand the effect of hypercapnia on mortality we performed multivariable logistic regression, and inverse probability-weighted regression to adjust for time-varying confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 288 patients to detect at least 3% of the effect on mortality. Our analysis revealed an association of severe hypercapnia with severe lung injury, low PaO2/FiO2, high dead space, and poor compliance. In univariate analysis severe hypercapnia showed higher mortality: OR=3.50, 95% CI (1.46-8.43). However, after, adjusting for disease severity hypercapnia is not found to be associated with mortality: OR=1.08, 95% CI (0.32-3.64). The sensitive analysis with weighted regression also shows no significant effect on mortality: OR=1.04, 95% CI (0.95-1.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that hypercapnia is not associated with mortality in COVID-19 ARDS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的特点是进行性肺部炎症导致死腔增加,从而引起高碳酸血症,增加患者发病和死亡的风险。为了改善 ARDS 患者的预后,已证明提供保护性肺通气可改善患者死亡率,但会增加高碳酸血症的发生率。因此,二氧化碳在 ARDS 中的作用仍然存在证据矛盾。本研究旨在研究机械通气 COVID-19 ARDS 患者高碳酸血症与死亡率之间的矛盾关系:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究。数据来自信德传染病医院和研究中心(SIDH & RC)2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 8 月期间收治的 COVID-19 ARDS 患者的病历,这些患者接受机械通气的时间超过 48 小时。根据动脉血二氧化碳水平(PaCO2)将患者分为严重高碳酸血症组和非严重高碳酸血症组。为了解高碳酸血症对死亡率的影响,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归和反概率加权回归,以调整随时间变化的混杂因素:我们纳入了 288 名患者,以检测至少 3% 的死亡率影响。我们的分析表明,严重高碳酸血症与严重肺损伤、低 PaO2/FiO2、高死腔和顺应性差有关。在单变量分析中,严重高碳酸血症显示死亡率较高:OR=3.50,95% CI(1.46-8.43)。然而,在对疾病严重程度进行调整后,发现高碳酸血症与死亡率无关:OR=1.08,95% CI(0.32-3.64)。加权回归的敏感性分析也显示,高碳酸血症对死亡率没有显著影响:结论:本研究表明,高碳酸血症与 COVID-19 ARDS 患者的死亡率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hypercapnia outcome in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilator: A retrospective observational cohort.

Introduction: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by progressive lung inflammation which leads to increased dead space that can cause hypercapnia and can increase the risk of patient morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to improve ARDS patient outcomes provision of protective lung ventilation has been shown to improve patient mortality but increases the incidence of hypercapnia. Therefore, the role of carbon dioxide in ARDS remains contradicted by conflicted evidence. This study aims to examine this conflicting relationship between hyper-capnia and mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. The data was collected from the medical records of the patients admitted with COVID-19 ARDS in Sindh Infectious Disease Hospital & Research Centre (SIDH & RC) from August 2020 to August 2022 and who received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. The patients were grouped into severe and no severe hypercapnia groups based on their arterial blood carbon dioxide levels (PaCO2). To understand the effect of hypercapnia on mortality we performed multivariable logistic regression, and inverse probability-weighted regression to adjust for time-varying confounders.

Results: We included 288 patients to detect at least 3% of the effect on mortality. Our analysis revealed an association of severe hypercapnia with severe lung injury, low PaO2/FiO2, high dead space, and poor compliance. In univariate analysis severe hypercapnia showed higher mortality: OR=3.50, 95% CI (1.46-8.43). However, after, adjusting for disease severity hypercapnia is not found to be associated with mortality: OR=1.08, 95% CI (0.32-3.64). The sensitive analysis with weighted regression also shows no significant effect on mortality: OR=1.04, 95% CI (0.95-1.14).

Conclusion: This study showed that hypercapnia is not associated with mortality in COVID-19 ARDS patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Journal of Critical Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信