极低出生体重婴儿与非支气管肺发育不良的肠道微生物群特征。

IF 3.2 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.3345/cep.2024.01718
Anucha Thatrimontrichai, Manapat Praditaukrit, Gunlawadee Maneenil, Supaporn Dissaneevate, Kamonnut Singkhamanan, Komwit Surachat
{"title":"极低出生体重婴儿与非支气管肺发育不良的肠道微生物群特征。","authors":"Anucha Thatrimontrichai, Manapat Praditaukrit, Gunlawadee Maneenil, Supaporn Dissaneevate, Kamonnut Singkhamanan, Komwit Surachat","doi":"10.3345/cep.2024.01718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gut-lung crosstalk is a pathway involving interactions between the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and immune systems. The immune responses of the gut and lungs are intricately linked, and previous studies demonstrated that the gut microbiota can influence systemic immune responses in the respiratory system as well as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the composition of the gut microbiota in very low birth weight infants with versus without BPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary data from a previous randomized controlled trial were analyzed. Microbiomes were analyzed using QIIME 2 software. Gut microbiota diversity and abundance were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one neonates were classified into the BPD (n=24) and non-BPD (n=27) groups, between which no differences were noted in the alpha and beta diversities of the gut microbiota. In both groups, Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Klebsiella were the predominant phylum, class, and genus in gut microbiota, respectively. Enterococcus, Acinetobacter, Elizabethkingia, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Bacteroides, Streptococcus, and Serratia were more abundant, whereas Klebsiella, Faecalibacterium, Escherichia-Shigella, Enterobacter, Bifidobacterium, Veillonella, Staphylococcus, and Enterobacteriaceae were less abundant in the BPD versus non-BPD group. Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Clostridium, Eubacterium, and Coprococcus were significantly more abundant in the non-BPD versus BPD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The alpha and beta diversities of the gut microbiota did not differ significantly between the BPD and non-BPD groups. However, in terms of relative abundance, the presence of common respiratory pathogens was notable in the BPD group. Conversely, the non-BPD group had a significantly higher prevalence of anaerobic taxa known for their capacity to produce butyrate, a key component of postbiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36018,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"503-511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of gut microbiota in very low birth weight infants with versus without bronchopulmonary dysplasia.\",\"authors\":\"Anucha Thatrimontrichai, Manapat Praditaukrit, Gunlawadee Maneenil, Supaporn Dissaneevate, Kamonnut Singkhamanan, Komwit Surachat\",\"doi\":\"10.3345/cep.2024.01718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gut-lung crosstalk is a pathway involving interactions between the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and immune systems. The immune responses of the gut and lungs are intricately linked, and previous studies demonstrated that the gut microbiota can influence systemic immune responses in the respiratory system as well as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the composition of the gut microbiota in very low birth weight infants with versus without BPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary data from a previous randomized controlled trial were analyzed. Microbiomes were analyzed using QIIME 2 software. Gut microbiota diversity and abundance were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one neonates were classified into the BPD (n=24) and non-BPD (n=27) groups, between which no differences were noted in the alpha and beta diversities of the gut microbiota. In both groups, Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Klebsiella were the predominant phylum, class, and genus in gut microbiota, respectively. Enterococcus, Acinetobacter, Elizabethkingia, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Bacteroides, Streptococcus, and Serratia were more abundant, whereas Klebsiella, Faecalibacterium, Escherichia-Shigella, Enterobacter, Bifidobacterium, Veillonella, Staphylococcus, and Enterobacteriaceae were less abundant in the BPD versus non-BPD group. Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Clostridium, Eubacterium, and Coprococcus were significantly more abundant in the non-BPD versus BPD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The alpha and beta diversities of the gut microbiota did not differ significantly between the BPD and non-BPD groups. However, in terms of relative abundance, the presence of common respiratory pathogens was notable in the BPD group. Conversely, the non-BPD group had a significantly higher prevalence of anaerobic taxa known for their capacity to produce butyrate, a key component of postbiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"503-511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235338/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2024.01718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2024.01718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肠-肺串扰是一种涉及胃肠道、呼吸系统和免疫系统相互作用的途径。肠道和肺部的免疫反应错综复杂,先前的研究表明,肠道微生物群可以影响呼吸系统的全身免疫反应以及支气管肺发育不良(BPD)。目的:分析极低出生体重婴儿与无BPD的肠道菌群组成。方法:对先前随机对照试验的二次资料进行分析。采用QIIME 2软件分析微生物组。各组间肠道菌群多样性和丰度比较。结果:51名新生儿被分为BPD组(n=24)和非BPD组(n=27),两组之间的肠道微生物群α和β多样性没有差异。在两组中,变形菌属、γ变形菌属和克雷伯菌属分别是肠道微生物群的优势门、纲和属。肠球菌、不动杆菌、伊丽莎白杆菌、严格感梭菌1、拟杆菌、链球菌和沙雷氏菌含量更高,而克雷伯氏菌、粪杆菌、埃希氏志贺氏菌、肠杆菌、双歧杆菌、细细杆菌、葡萄球菌和肠杆菌科在BPD组的含量低于非BPD组。Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Clostridium, Eubacterium和Coprococcus在非BPD组明显多于BPD组。结论:BPD组和非BPD组肠道菌群α和β多样性无显著差异。然而,就相对丰度而言,常见呼吸道病原体的存在在BPD组中是显著的。相反,非bpd组有明显更高的厌氧分类群,以其产生丁酸盐的能力而闻名,丁酸盐是后生物的关键成分。临床试验注册:该试验在泰国临床试验(https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/export/pdf/TCTR20180306002;首次发布注册日期:2018年3月6日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of gut microbiota in very low birth weight infants with versus without bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Background: Gut-lung crosstalk is a pathway involving interactions between the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and immune systems. The immune responses of the gut and lungs are intricately linked, and previous studies demonstrated that the gut microbiota can influence systemic immune responses in the respiratory system as well as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD).

Purpose: To analyze the composition of the gut microbiota in very low birth weight infants with versus without BPD.

Methods: Secondary data from a previous randomized controlled trial were analyzed. Microbiomes were analyzed using QIIME 2 software. Gut microbiota diversity and abundance were compared between groups.

Results: Fifty-one neonates were classified into the BPD (n=24) and non-BPD (n=27) groups, between which no differences were noted in the alpha and beta diversities of the gut microbiota. In both groups, Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Klebsiella were the predominant phylum, class, and genus in gut microbiota, respectively. Enterococcus, Acinetobacter, Elizabethkingia, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Bacteroides, Streptococcus, and Serratia were more abundant, whereas Klebsiella, Faecalibacterium, Escherichia-Shigella, Enterobacter, Bifidobacterium, Veillonella, Staphylococcus, and Enterobacteriaceae were less abundant in the BPD versus non-BPD group. Faecalibacterium, Roseburia, Clostridium, Eubacterium, and Coprococcus were significantly more abundant in the non-BPD versus BPD group.

Conclusion: The alpha and beta diversities of the gut microbiota did not differ significantly between the BPD and non-BPD groups. However, in terms of relative abundance, the presence of common respiratory pathogens was notable in the BPD group. Conversely, the non-BPD group had a significantly higher prevalence of anaerobic taxa known for their capacity to produce butyrate, a key component of postbiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.40%
发文量
88
审稿时长
60 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信