结直肠手术中吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影的定量:文献系统综述。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Philip D McEntee, Ashokkumar Singaravelu, Cathleen A McCarrick, Edward Murphy, Patrick A Boland, Ronan A Cahill
{"title":"结直肠手术中吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影的定量:文献系统综述。","authors":"Philip D McEntee, Ashokkumar Singaravelu, Cathleen A McCarrick, Edward Murphy, Patrick A Boland, Ronan A Cahill","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11621-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) during colorectal surgery associates with reduced post-operative anastomotic complication rates. Because its interpretation is subjective, quantification has been proposed to address inter-user variability. This study reviews the published literature regarding ICGFA quantification during colorectal surgery with a focus on impactful clinical deployment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed of English language publications regarding clinical studies of ICGFA quantification in colorectal surgery in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library on 29th August 2024, updated to 18th November 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1428 studies were screened with 22 studies (1469 patients) selected. There was significant heterogeneity of ICGFA methodology, quantification methods and parameter selection and only three studies were NOS \"high\" quality. Extracorporeal application was most common. Four studies (154 patients) conducted real-time ICGFA analyses (others were post hoc) and four utilised artificial intelligence methods. Eleven studies only included patients undergoing left-sided resection (six focusing specifically on rectal resections). Only one study employed the quantification method to guide intra-operative decision-making regarding colonic transection. Twenty-six different perfusion parameters were assessed, with time from injection to visible fluorescence and maximum intensity the most commonly (but not only) correlated parameters regarding anastomotic complication (n = 18). Other grounding correlates were tissue oxygenation (n = 3, two with hyperspectral imagery), metabolites (n = 2) and surgeon interpretation (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantification of the ICGFA signal for colorectal surgery is feasible but has so far seen limited academic advancement beyond feasibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"2677-2691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Philip D McEntee, Ashokkumar Singaravelu, Cathleen A McCarrick, Edward Murphy, Patrick A Boland, Ronan A Cahill\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-11621-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) during colorectal surgery associates with reduced post-operative anastomotic complication rates. Because its interpretation is subjective, quantification has been proposed to address inter-user variability. This study reviews the published literature regarding ICGFA quantification during colorectal surgery with a focus on impactful clinical deployment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed of English language publications regarding clinical studies of ICGFA quantification in colorectal surgery in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library on 29th August 2024, updated to 18th November 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1428 studies were screened with 22 studies (1469 patients) selected. There was significant heterogeneity of ICGFA methodology, quantification methods and parameter selection and only three studies were NOS \\\"high\\\" quality. Extracorporeal application was most common. Four studies (154 patients) conducted real-time ICGFA analyses (others were post hoc) and four utilised artificial intelligence methods. Eleven studies only included patients undergoing left-sided resection (six focusing specifically on rectal resections). Only one study employed the quantification method to guide intra-operative decision-making regarding colonic transection. Twenty-six different perfusion parameters were assessed, with time from injection to visible fluorescence and maximum intensity the most commonly (but not only) correlated parameters regarding anastomotic complication (n = 18). Other grounding correlates were tissue oxygenation (n = 3, two with hyperspectral imagery), metabolites (n = 2) and surgeon interpretation (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantification of the ICGFA signal for colorectal surgery is feasible but has so far seen limited academic advancement beyond feasibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2677-2691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933147/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11621-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11621-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在结直肠手术中进行吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影(ICGFA)可以降低术后吻合口并发症的发生率。由于其解释是主观的,因此提出了量化来解决用户间的可变性。本研究回顾了结直肠手术中ICGFA量化的已发表文献,重点是有效的临床应用。方法:根据PRISMA指南,对2024年8月29日更新至11月18日的PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library中有关结直肠手术中ICGFA量化临床研究的英文出版物进行系统综述。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS)评价质量。结果:共筛选1428项研究,选择22项研究(1469例患者)。ICGFA方法学、量化方法和参数选择存在显著异质性,仅有3项研究为NOS“高”质量。体外应用最为常见。四项研究(154例患者)进行了实时ICGFA分析(其他为事后分析),四项研究使用了人工智能方法。11项研究仅包括左侧切除的患者(6项专门针对直肠切除)。只有一项研究采用量化方法指导结肠横断术中决策。评估了26种不同的灌注参数,包括注射到可见荧光的时间和最大强度与吻合口并发症最常见(但不仅是)相关的参数(n = 18)。其他接地相关因素是组织氧合(n = 3, 2与高光谱图像),代谢物(n = 2)和外科医生解释(n = 5)。结论:ICGFA信号在结直肠手术中的量化是可行的,但迄今为止,超出可行性的学术进展有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantification of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Background: Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICGFA) during colorectal surgery associates with reduced post-operative anastomotic complication rates. Because its interpretation is subjective, quantification has been proposed to address inter-user variability. This study reviews the published literature regarding ICGFA quantification during colorectal surgery with a focus on impactful clinical deployment.

Methods: A systematic review was performed of English language publications regarding clinical studies of ICGFA quantification in colorectal surgery in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library on 29th August 2024, updated to 18th November 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess quality.

Results: A total of 1428 studies were screened with 22 studies (1469 patients) selected. There was significant heterogeneity of ICGFA methodology, quantification methods and parameter selection and only three studies were NOS "high" quality. Extracorporeal application was most common. Four studies (154 patients) conducted real-time ICGFA analyses (others were post hoc) and four utilised artificial intelligence methods. Eleven studies only included patients undergoing left-sided resection (six focusing specifically on rectal resections). Only one study employed the quantification method to guide intra-operative decision-making regarding colonic transection. Twenty-six different perfusion parameters were assessed, with time from injection to visible fluorescence and maximum intensity the most commonly (but not only) correlated parameters regarding anastomotic complication (n = 18). Other grounding correlates were tissue oxygenation (n = 3, two with hyperspectral imagery), metabolites (n = 2) and surgeon interpretation (n = 5).

Conclusion: Quantification of the ICGFA signal for colorectal surgery is feasible but has so far seen limited academic advancement beyond feasibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信