Ted K S Ng, Todd Beck, Kyle R Dennis, Pankaja Desai, Kristin Krueger, Klodian Dhana, Robert S Wilson, Denis A Evans, Kumar B Rajan
{"title":"社会隔离、孤独及其对认知能力下降和阿尔茨海默氏症的共同影响:芝加哥健康与老龄化项目的研究结果。","authors":"Ted K S Ng, Todd Beck, Kyle R Dennis, Pankaja Desai, Kristin Krueger, Klodian Dhana, Robert S Wilson, Denis A Evans, Kumar B Rajan","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been contradictory evidence on the prospective associations between social isolation/loneliness (SI/L) and cognitive decline (CD). There is also a scarcity of large and diverse population-based cohort studies examining SI/L that have confirmed clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Notably, beyond individual associations, whether the effects of SI/L compound and accelerate CD and incident AD are not known.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that SI and L, independently, would be associated with CD and incident AD to a similar extent, and the association of SI with CD and incident AD would be higher in lonely older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban Chicago areas.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We analyzed data in the Chicago Health and Aging Project (CHAP), which comprised 7,760 biracial community-dwelling older adults [mean age (standard deviation (SD))=72.3 (6.3); 64 % Black & 63 % women; mean (SD) of follow-up=7.9 (4.3) years].</p><p><strong>Intervention (if any): </strong>NA MEASUREMENTS: Linear mixed and logistic regression models were used to regress CD and incident AD separately on the SI index/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SI index and L were significantly associated with CD, with one-point increase of beta estimate (SE, p-value) = -0.002 (0.001,0.022) and -0.012 (0.003,<0.001), respectively. Given that the SI index ranges from 0 to 5 and the L from 0 to 1, they had similar effect sizes. Similarly, there were significant associations between SI index and incident AD, odds ratio (95 % CI, p-value) = 1.183 (1.016-1.379,0.029), and between L and incident AD, 2.117 (1.227-3.655,0.006). When stratified by loneliness status, compared to older adults who were not isolated and not lonely, older adults who reported being socially isolated and not lonely experienced accelerated CD, -0.003 (0.001,0.004), despite no significantly increased odds of incident AD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SI/L had significant associations with CD and incident AD. Notably, socially isolated older adults who reported not being lonely appeared to be most socially vulnerable to CD. These findings suggest a specific at-risk subgroup of socially vulnerable older adults for future targeted interventions to improve cognitive health.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"12 3","pages":"100046"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social isolation, loneliness, and their joint effects on cognitive decline and incident Alzheimer's disease: Findings from the Chicago health and aging project.\",\"authors\":\"Ted K S Ng, Todd Beck, Kyle R Dennis, Pankaja Desai, Kristin Krueger, Klodian Dhana, Robert S Wilson, Denis A Evans, Kumar B Rajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been contradictory evidence on the prospective associations between social isolation/loneliness (SI/L) and cognitive decline (CD). There is also a scarcity of large and diverse population-based cohort studies examining SI/L that have confirmed clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Notably, beyond individual associations, whether the effects of SI/L compound and accelerate CD and incident AD are not known.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesized that SI and L, independently, would be associated with CD and incident AD to a similar extent, and the association of SI with CD and incident AD would be higher in lonely older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban Chicago areas.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We analyzed data in the Chicago Health and Aging Project (CHAP), which comprised 7,760 biracial community-dwelling older adults [mean age (standard deviation (SD))=72.3 (6.3); 64 % Black & 63 % women; mean (SD) of follow-up=7.9 (4.3) years].</p><p><strong>Intervention (if any): </strong>NA MEASUREMENTS: Linear mixed and logistic regression models were used to regress CD and incident AD separately on the SI index/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SI index and L were significantly associated with CD, with one-point increase of beta estimate (SE, p-value) = -0.002 (0.001,0.022) and -0.012 (0.003,<0.001), respectively. Given that the SI index ranges from 0 to 5 and the L from 0 to 1, they had similar effect sizes. Similarly, there were significant associations between SI index and incident AD, odds ratio (95 % CI, p-value) = 1.183 (1.016-1.379,0.029), and between L and incident AD, 2.117 (1.227-3.655,0.006). When stratified by loneliness status, compared to older adults who were not isolated and not lonely, older adults who reported being socially isolated and not lonely experienced accelerated CD, -0.003 (0.001,0.004), despite no significantly increased odds of incident AD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SI/L had significant associations with CD and incident AD. Notably, socially isolated older adults who reported not being lonely appeared to be most socially vulnerable to CD. These findings suggest a specific at-risk subgroup of socially vulnerable older adults for future targeted interventions to improve cognitive health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"100046\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Social isolation, loneliness, and their joint effects on cognitive decline and incident Alzheimer's disease: Findings from the Chicago health and aging project.
Background: There has been contradictory evidence on the prospective associations between social isolation/loneliness (SI/L) and cognitive decline (CD). There is also a scarcity of large and diverse population-based cohort studies examining SI/L that have confirmed clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Notably, beyond individual associations, whether the effects of SI/L compound and accelerate CD and incident AD are not known.
Objectives: We hypothesized that SI and L, independently, would be associated with CD and incident AD to a similar extent, and the association of SI with CD and incident AD would be higher in lonely older adults.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Urban Chicago areas.
Participants: We analyzed data in the Chicago Health and Aging Project (CHAP), which comprised 7,760 biracial community-dwelling older adults [mean age (standard deviation (SD))=72.3 (6.3); 64 % Black & 63 % women; mean (SD) of follow-up=7.9 (4.3) years].
Intervention (if any): NA MEASUREMENTS: Linear mixed and logistic regression models were used to regress CD and incident AD separately on the SI index/L.
Results: SI index and L were significantly associated with CD, with one-point increase of beta estimate (SE, p-value) = -0.002 (0.001,0.022) and -0.012 (0.003,<0.001), respectively. Given that the SI index ranges from 0 to 5 and the L from 0 to 1, they had similar effect sizes. Similarly, there were significant associations between SI index and incident AD, odds ratio (95 % CI, p-value) = 1.183 (1.016-1.379,0.029), and between L and incident AD, 2.117 (1.227-3.655,0.006). When stratified by loneliness status, compared to older adults who were not isolated and not lonely, older adults who reported being socially isolated and not lonely experienced accelerated CD, -0.003 (0.001,0.004), despite no significantly increased odds of incident AD.
Conclusions: SI/L had significant associations with CD and incident AD. Notably, socially isolated older adults who reported not being lonely appeared to be most socially vulnerable to CD. These findings suggest a specific at-risk subgroup of socially vulnerable older adults for future targeted interventions to improve cognitive health.
期刊介绍:
The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.