IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
Kejin Chen, Xiaoyan Zhao, Jingwen Zhou
{"title":"Effect of a single nonpharmacological intervention on cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Kejin Chen, Xiaoyan Zhao, Jingwen Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most studies of nonpharmacological interventions have used a combination of medications in experimental and control groups to improve cognitive functioning or to control symptoms, but the results have been inconsistent with respect to the effects of single nonpharmacological interventions on cognitive functioning in older patients with Alzheimer's disease. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a single nonpharmacological intervention on cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in the first week of January 2024, searching eight electronic databases for articles that reflect on non-pharmacological interventions in Alzheimer's disease published between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 2023. All included articles had to be randomized controlled trials. The primary measure was the change in cognitive function before and after the intervention. Data were extracted by two authors and quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook. With the exception of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale [MD=2.99, 95% CI (-0.66,6.63)], the differences between the intervention group and the control group were significant for all the remaining scales, namely, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [SMD=0.65, 95% CI (0.15,1.15)], Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL) [MD=-2.30, 95% CI (-3.63,0.97)], Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QoL-AD) [MD=5.03, 95% CI (2.27,7.78)], Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [MD=-2.16, 95% CI (-3.86,0.46)], and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive score (ADAS-cog) [MD=-5.21, 95% CI (-7.89,2.54)]. Subgroup analysis revealed that the most effective intervention was exercise therapy, followed by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. On the other hand, music therapy was not found to be effective. Current evidence suggests that nonpharmacological interventions can be used to improve cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. This study was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024497247).</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"12 3","pages":"100050"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数关于非药物干预的研究都是在实验组和对照组中联合使用药物来改善认知功能或控制症状,但关于单一非药物干预对老年痴呆症患者认知功能的影响,研究结果并不一致。本研究旨在评估单一非药物干预对轻度至中度阿尔茨海默氏症老年人认知功能的影响。我们在 2024 年 1 月的第一周进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,在 8 个电子数据库中检索了 1986 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的有关阿尔茨海默病非药物干预的文章。所有纳入的文章必须是随机对照试验。主要衡量标准是干预前后认知功能的变化。数据由两位作者提取,并使用《科克伦手册》进行质量评估。除蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)量表[MD=2.99,95% CI (-0.66,6.63)]外,干预组与对照组在其余所有量表上的差异均有显著性,这些量表包括:小型精神状态检查(MMSE)[SMD=0.65,95% CI (0.15,1.15)]、日常活动量[SMD=2.99,95% CI (-0.66,6.63)]。15)]、日常生活活动量表(ADL)[MD=-2.30,95% CI(-3.63,0.97)]、阿尔茨海默病生活质量量表(QoL-AD)[MD=5.03,95% CI(2.27,7.78)]、神经精神量表(NPI)[MD=-2.16,95% CI(-3.86,0.46)]和阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知评分(ADAS-cog)[MD=-5.21,95% CI(-7.89,2.54)]。分组分析显示,最有效的干预措施是运动疗法,其次是重复经颅磁刺激。另一方面,音乐疗法并不有效。目前的证据表明,非药物干预可用于改善轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病老年人的认知功能。本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册(注册号:CRD42024497247)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of a single nonpharmacological intervention on cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Most studies of nonpharmacological interventions have used a combination of medications in experimental and control groups to improve cognitive functioning or to control symptoms, but the results have been inconsistent with respect to the effects of single nonpharmacological interventions on cognitive functioning in older patients with Alzheimer's disease. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a single nonpharmacological intervention on cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in the first week of January 2024, searching eight electronic databases for articles that reflect on non-pharmacological interventions in Alzheimer's disease published between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 2023. All included articles had to be randomized controlled trials. The primary measure was the change in cognitive function before and after the intervention. Data were extracted by two authors and quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook. With the exception of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale [MD=2.99, 95% CI (-0.66,6.63)], the differences between the intervention group and the control group were significant for all the remaining scales, namely, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [SMD=0.65, 95% CI (0.15,1.15)], Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL) [MD=-2.30, 95% CI (-3.63,0.97)], Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QoL-AD) [MD=5.03, 95% CI (2.27,7.78)], Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [MD=-2.16, 95% CI (-3.86,0.46)], and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive score (ADAS-cog) [MD=-5.21, 95% CI (-7.89,2.54)]. Subgroup analysis revealed that the most effective intervention was exercise therapy, followed by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. On the other hand, music therapy was not found to be effective. Current evidence suggests that nonpharmacological interventions can be used to improve cognitive functioning in older adults with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. This study was registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024497247).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信