{"title":"基因突变对晚期阑尾癌预后和化疗疗效的影响:来自日本全国综合基因组分析测试数据库的见解","authors":"Sakura Hiraide Taniguchi, Masanobu Takahashi, Shih-Wei Chiu, Keigo Komine, Shonosuke Wakayama, Ryunosuke Numakura, Yuya Yoshida, Yuki Kasahara, Kota Ouchi, Hiroo Imai, Ken Saijo, Hidekazu Shirota, Chikashi Ishioka","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02724-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appendiceal carcinoma (AC) is a rare malignancy and has distinct genomic features, but their impact on prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed patients with advanced AC from the Japanese nationwide comprehensive genomic profiling test database, the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database, focusing on genetic alterations and their associations with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 314 patients, the histological types Queryincluded adenocarcinoma (Ad) (51.9%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAd) (30.3%), goblet cell adenocarcinoma (12.4%), and signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (5.4%). The most common mutations were KRAS (52.5%), TP53 (49.4%), SMAD4 (18.8%), and GNAS (17.2%). KRAS mutations were most frequent in MAd (68.4%) and Ad (58.9%), whereas TP53 mutations were mostly prevalent in Ad (62.6%). We classified patients into molecular subtypes based on the presence of mutations and analyzed differences in overall survival (OS) by molecular subtype. Patients with TP53-mutant (mut) dominant tumors (all TP53-mut) and KRAS-mut focused tumors (TP53-wild-type (wt)/GNAS-wt/KRAS-mut/any SMAD4) showed a poorer median OS compared with those with GNAS-mut focused tumors (TP53-wt/GNAS-mut/any KRAS /any SMAD4) (median 47.4 and 37.5 months vs. not reached; p = 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). TP53 mutation was associated with poor time to treatment failure and OS with the oxaliplatin-based regimen for first-line chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that the genetic mutations influenced the prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy in AC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"914-925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of genetic mutations on prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy in advanced appendiceal carcinoma: insights from the nationwide Japanese comprehensive genomic profiling test database.\",\"authors\":\"Sakura Hiraide Taniguchi, Masanobu Takahashi, Shih-Wei Chiu, Keigo Komine, Shonosuke Wakayama, Ryunosuke Numakura, Yuya Yoshida, Yuki Kasahara, Kota Ouchi, Hiroo Imai, Ken Saijo, Hidekazu Shirota, Chikashi Ishioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02724-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appendiceal carcinoma (AC) is a rare malignancy and has distinct genomic features, but their impact on prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed patients with advanced AC from the Japanese nationwide comprehensive genomic profiling test database, the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database, focusing on genetic alterations and their associations with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 314 patients, the histological types Queryincluded adenocarcinoma (Ad) (51.9%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAd) (30.3%), goblet cell adenocarcinoma (12.4%), and signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (5.4%). The most common mutations were KRAS (52.5%), TP53 (49.4%), SMAD4 (18.8%), and GNAS (17.2%). KRAS mutations were most frequent in MAd (68.4%) and Ad (58.9%), whereas TP53 mutations were mostly prevalent in Ad (62.6%). We classified patients into molecular subtypes based on the presence of mutations and analyzed differences in overall survival (OS) by molecular subtype. Patients with TP53-mutant (mut) dominant tumors (all TP53-mut) and KRAS-mut focused tumors (TP53-wild-type (wt)/GNAS-wt/KRAS-mut/any SMAD4) showed a poorer median OS compared with those with GNAS-mut focused tumors (TP53-wt/GNAS-mut/any KRAS /any SMAD4) (median 47.4 and 37.5 months vs. not reached; p = 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). TP53 mutation was associated with poor time to treatment failure and OS with the oxaliplatin-based regimen for first-line chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that the genetic mutations influenced the prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy in AC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"914-925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02724-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02724-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of genetic mutations on prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy in advanced appendiceal carcinoma: insights from the nationwide Japanese comprehensive genomic profiling test database.
Background: Appendiceal carcinoma (AC) is a rare malignancy and has distinct genomic features, but their impact on prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy requires further investigation.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients with advanced AC from the Japanese nationwide comprehensive genomic profiling test database, the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database, focusing on genetic alterations and their associations with clinical outcomes.
Results: Of the 314 patients, the histological types Queryincluded adenocarcinoma (Ad) (51.9%), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAd) (30.3%), goblet cell adenocarcinoma (12.4%), and signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma (5.4%). The most common mutations were KRAS (52.5%), TP53 (49.4%), SMAD4 (18.8%), and GNAS (17.2%). KRAS mutations were most frequent in MAd (68.4%) and Ad (58.9%), whereas TP53 mutations were mostly prevalent in Ad (62.6%). We classified patients into molecular subtypes based on the presence of mutations and analyzed differences in overall survival (OS) by molecular subtype. Patients with TP53-mutant (mut) dominant tumors (all TP53-mut) and KRAS-mut focused tumors (TP53-wild-type (wt)/GNAS-wt/KRAS-mut/any SMAD4) showed a poorer median OS compared with those with GNAS-mut focused tumors (TP53-wt/GNAS-mut/any KRAS /any SMAD4) (median 47.4 and 37.5 months vs. not reached; p = 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). TP53 mutation was associated with poor time to treatment failure and OS with the oxaliplatin-based regimen for first-line chemotherapy.
Conclusions: This study suggested that the genetic mutations influenced the prognosis and chemotherapy efficacy in AC.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.