Brendan Holderread, Ishaq Syed, Caleb Shin, Leonide Toussaint, Andrew Lewis, David Botros, Ioannis Avramis, James Rizkalla
{"title":"腰椎融合术后腰竖肌脊柱平面阻滞的效果:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Brendan Holderread, Ishaq Syed, Caleb Shin, Leonide Toussaint, Andrew Lewis, David Botros, Ioannis Avramis, James Rizkalla","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized control trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine erector spinae plane block on a large, comprehensive scale, and investigate the management of postoperative pain and recovery process after lumbar spine surgery using this block.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Pain management is a key aspect of a patient's care and overall surgical outcome regarding spinal surgery. While most patients have no issues when undergoing spinal surgery, many have pain that will persist postoperation. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks before lumbar arthrodesis in helping manage the persisting pains and opioid consumption postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blinded randomized control trial was designed and executed on patients who were to undergo lumbar spine fusion. Before their surgical intervention, patients were randomly assigned to receive the erector spinae plane block or the normal anesthesia/pain management routine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 49 patients, 23 (47%) underwent a spinal block before their respective lumbar spine procedure. Patients with spinal block required fewer supplemental opioids postoperatively (69.9±6.66 vs. 71.7±5.70, P= 0.0002) while reporting less severe pain on VAS pain scoring throughout the first 3 postoperative days (P< 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient population that received the erector spinae block had significantly lower pain scores on days 1-3 postsurgery, showing that the spine block is effective in helping patients recover from spinal surgery quicker and with less persisting pain. In addition, the number of patients who filled their first opioid prescription was approaching significance, with the ESP block group filling those prescriptions less frequently. ESP blocks appear to be efficacious at reducing pain and opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period. No additional complications or readmissions were apparent between subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blocks After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Brendan Holderread, Ishaq Syed, Caleb Shin, Leonide Toussaint, Andrew Lewis, David Botros, Ioannis Avramis, James Rizkalla\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized control trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine erector spinae plane block on a large, comprehensive scale, and investigate the management of postoperative pain and recovery process after lumbar spine surgery using this block.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Pain management is a key aspect of a patient's care and overall surgical outcome regarding spinal surgery. While most patients have no issues when undergoing spinal surgery, many have pain that will persist postoperation. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks before lumbar arthrodesis in helping manage the persisting pains and opioid consumption postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-blinded randomized control trial was designed and executed on patients who were to undergo lumbar spine fusion. Before their surgical intervention, patients were randomly assigned to receive the erector spinae plane block or the normal anesthesia/pain management routine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 49 patients, 23 (47%) underwent a spinal block before their respective lumbar spine procedure. Patients with spinal block required fewer supplemental opioids postoperatively (69.9±6.66 vs. 71.7±5.70, P= 0.0002) while reporting less severe pain on VAS pain scoring throughout the first 3 postoperative days (P< 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient population that received the erector spinae block had significantly lower pain scores on days 1-3 postsurgery, showing that the spine block is effective in helping patients recover from spinal surgery quicker and with less persisting pain. In addition, the number of patients who filled their first opioid prescription was approaching significance, with the ESP block group filling those prescriptions less frequently. ESP blocks appear to be efficacious at reducing pain and opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period. No additional complications or readmissions were apparent between subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001767\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:随机对照试验。目的:对竖脊肌平面阻滞进行大规模、全面的研究,探讨应用该阻滞对腰椎手术后疼痛和恢复过程的处理。背景资料总结:疼痛管理是脊柱手术患者护理和整体手术结果的关键方面。虽然大多数患者在接受脊柱手术时没有问题,但许多患者术后会持续疼痛。我们的目的是评估腰椎关节融合术前竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞在帮助控制术后持续疼痛和阿片类药物消耗方面的疗效。方法:设计一项单盲随机对照试验,对拟行腰椎融合术的患者实施。在手术干预前,患者被随机分配接受竖脊肌平面阻滞或正常麻醉/疼痛管理常规。结果:在49例患者中,23例(47%)在各自的腰椎手术前接受了脊柱阻滞。脊髓阻滞患者术后需要较少的阿片类药物补充(69.9±6.66 vs 71.7±5.70,P= 0.0002),在术后前3天的VAS疼痛评分中报告的疼痛程度较轻(P< 0.0001)。结论:接受竖脊肌阻滞的患者在术后1-3天疼痛评分明显降低,表明脊柱阻滞能有效帮助患者更快地从脊柱手术中恢复,并减少持续疼痛。此外,第一次服用阿片类药物处方的患者数量接近显著,ESP阻断组服用这些处方的频率较低。ESP阻滞似乎在术后立即减少疼痛和阿片类药物消耗方面有效。亚组间无明显并发症或再入院。
Effect of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blocks After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial.
Study design: Randomized control trial.
Objective: To examine erector spinae plane block on a large, comprehensive scale, and investigate the management of postoperative pain and recovery process after lumbar spine surgery using this block.
Summary of background data: Pain management is a key aspect of a patient's care and overall surgical outcome regarding spinal surgery. While most patients have no issues when undergoing spinal surgery, many have pain that will persist postoperation. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks before lumbar arthrodesis in helping manage the persisting pains and opioid consumption postsurgery.
Methods: A single-blinded randomized control trial was designed and executed on patients who were to undergo lumbar spine fusion. Before their surgical intervention, patients were randomly assigned to receive the erector spinae plane block or the normal anesthesia/pain management routine.
Results: Of a total of 49 patients, 23 (47%) underwent a spinal block before their respective lumbar spine procedure. Patients with spinal block required fewer supplemental opioids postoperatively (69.9±6.66 vs. 71.7±5.70, P= 0.0002) while reporting less severe pain on VAS pain scoring throughout the first 3 postoperative days (P< 0.0001).
Conclusions: The patient population that received the erector spinae block had significantly lower pain scores on days 1-3 postsurgery, showing that the spine block is effective in helping patients recover from spinal surgery quicker and with less persisting pain. In addition, the number of patients who filled their first opioid prescription was approaching significance, with the ESP block group filling those prescriptions less frequently. ESP blocks appear to be efficacious at reducing pain and opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period. No additional complications or readmissions were apparent between subgroups.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.