Quynh T Tran, Sujuan Jia, Md Zahangir Alom, Lu Wang, Charles G Mullighan, Ruth G Tatevossian, Brent A Orr
{"title":"福尔马林固定石蜡包埋衍生DNA的靶向富集酶甲基化测序对脑肿瘤分类的验证。","authors":"Quynh T Tran, Sujuan Jia, Md Zahangir Alom, Lu Wang, Charles G Mullighan, Ruth G Tatevossian, Brent A Orr","doi":"10.1111/bpa.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA methylation profiling by Illumina methylation array-based methods has revolutionized the molecular classification and diagnosis of brain tumors. A significant barrier to adopting these methods in a clinical environment is the requirement for specialized scanners, which results in high additional costs and a larger laboratory footprint. DNA sequencing-based alternatives are attractive because most clinical molecular pathology laboratories already use sequencers for other molecular assays. This study aimed to compare the utility of the newly developed sequencing-based enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) method paired with the Twist Human Methylome panel for brain tumor classification with standard Infinium Methylation BeadChip-based methods. We used DNA from fresh-frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) brain cancer samples from 19 patients and 1 control sample to construct DNA libraries covering 3.98 million CpG sites. We developed and validated a bioinformatics pipeline to analyze target-enriched EM-seq (TEEM-seq) data in comparison with standard array-based methods for tumor classification and copy number profiling. We found high concordance between TEEM-seq and traditional methods, with high correlation coefficients (>0.98) between FFPE replicates. We successfully classified tumor samples into the expected molecular classes with robust prediction scores (>0.82). We observed that FFPE samples required a sequencing depth of at least 35x to achieve consistently high and reliable prediction scores. The TEEM-seq method has the potential to complement existing tumor classification methods and lower the barriers for the adoption of methylation profiling in routine clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9290,"journal":{"name":"Brain Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"e70000"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of target-enriched enzymatic methylation sequencing for brain tumor classification from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded-derived DNA.\",\"authors\":\"Quynh T Tran, Sujuan Jia, Md Zahangir Alom, Lu Wang, Charles G Mullighan, Ruth G Tatevossian, Brent A Orr\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bpa.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>DNA methylation profiling by Illumina methylation array-based methods has revolutionized the molecular classification and diagnosis of brain tumors. A significant barrier to adopting these methods in a clinical environment is the requirement for specialized scanners, which results in high additional costs and a larger laboratory footprint. DNA sequencing-based alternatives are attractive because most clinical molecular pathology laboratories already use sequencers for other molecular assays. This study aimed to compare the utility of the newly developed sequencing-based enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) method paired with the Twist Human Methylome panel for brain tumor classification with standard Infinium Methylation BeadChip-based methods. We used DNA from fresh-frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) brain cancer samples from 19 patients and 1 control sample to construct DNA libraries covering 3.98 million CpG sites. We developed and validated a bioinformatics pipeline to analyze target-enriched EM-seq (TEEM-seq) data in comparison with standard array-based methods for tumor classification and copy number profiling. We found high concordance between TEEM-seq and traditional methods, with high correlation coefficients (>0.98) between FFPE replicates. We successfully classified tumor samples into the expected molecular classes with robust prediction scores (>0.82). We observed that FFPE samples required a sequencing depth of at least 35x to achieve consistently high and reliable prediction scores. The TEEM-seq method has the potential to complement existing tumor classification methods and lower the barriers for the adoption of methylation profiling in routine clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.70000\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.70000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
基于Illumina甲基化阵列的DNA甲基化分析方法已经彻底改变了脑肿瘤的分子分类和诊断。在临床环境中采用这些方法的一个重要障碍是需要专门的扫描仪,这导致了高昂的额外成本和更大的实验室占地面积。基于DNA测序的替代方法很有吸引力,因为大多数临床分子病理学实验室已经在使用测序仪进行其他分子分析。本研究旨在比较新开发的基于测序的酶促甲基测序(EM-seq)方法与Twist Human Methylome panel配对的脑肿瘤分类方法与基于Infinium Methylation beadchip的标准方法的效用。我们使用来自19例患者和1例对照样本的新鲜冷冻或福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)脑癌样本构建了包含398万个CpG位点的DNA文库。我们开发并验证了一个生物信息学管道来分析目标富集的EM-seq (TEEM-seq)数据,并与标准的基于阵列的肿瘤分类和拷贝数分析方法进行比较。我们发现TEEM-seq与传统方法的一致性很高,FFPE重复之间的相关系数很高(>0.98)。我们成功地将肿瘤样本分类到预期的分子类别中,预测分数(>0.82)稳健。我们观察到,FFPE样本需要至少35倍的测序深度才能获得一致的高可靠的预测分数。TEEM-seq方法有可能补充现有的肿瘤分类方法,并降低甲基化谱在常规临床应用中的障碍。
Validation of target-enriched enzymatic methylation sequencing for brain tumor classification from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded-derived DNA.
DNA methylation profiling by Illumina methylation array-based methods has revolutionized the molecular classification and diagnosis of brain tumors. A significant barrier to adopting these methods in a clinical environment is the requirement for specialized scanners, which results in high additional costs and a larger laboratory footprint. DNA sequencing-based alternatives are attractive because most clinical molecular pathology laboratories already use sequencers for other molecular assays. This study aimed to compare the utility of the newly developed sequencing-based enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-seq) method paired with the Twist Human Methylome panel for brain tumor classification with standard Infinium Methylation BeadChip-based methods. We used DNA from fresh-frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) brain cancer samples from 19 patients and 1 control sample to construct DNA libraries covering 3.98 million CpG sites. We developed and validated a bioinformatics pipeline to analyze target-enriched EM-seq (TEEM-seq) data in comparison with standard array-based methods for tumor classification and copy number profiling. We found high concordance between TEEM-seq and traditional methods, with high correlation coefficients (>0.98) between FFPE replicates. We successfully classified tumor samples into the expected molecular classes with robust prediction scores (>0.82). We observed that FFPE samples required a sequencing depth of at least 35x to achieve consistently high and reliable prediction scores. The TEEM-seq method has the potential to complement existing tumor classification methods and lower the barriers for the adoption of methylation profiling in routine clinical use.
期刊介绍:
Brain Pathology is the journal of choice for biomedical scientists investigating diseases of the nervous system. The official journal of the International Society of Neuropathology, Brain Pathology is a peer-reviewed quarterly publication that includes original research, review articles and symposia focuses on the pathogenesis of neurological disease.