量化白鼬和猫入侵对捕食者围栏野生动物保护区重新引入鸟类种群的影响

IF 2.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
K.A. Parker, T.G. Lovegrove, M. Maitland, E. Parlato, Z. Stone, D.P. Armstrong
{"title":"量化白鼬和猫入侵对捕食者围栏野生动物保护区重新引入鸟类种群的影响","authors":"K.A. Parker,&nbsp;T.G. Lovegrove,&nbsp;M. Maitland,&nbsp;E. Parlato,&nbsp;Z. Stone,&nbsp;D.P. Armstrong","doi":"10.1111/acv.13000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Control of introduced predators is essential for conserving many threatened species, but species range in vulnerability. Therefore, efficient conservation management requires estimating the vulnerabilities of different threatened species to introduced predators. Here, we quantify population responses of reintroduced toutouwai (<i>Petroica longipes</i>), popokatea (<i>Mohoua albicilla</i>) and tīeke (<i>Philesturnus rufusater</i>) to incursions of stoats (<i>Mustela erminea</i>) and cats (<i>Felis catus</i>) to a 588-ha predator-fenced sanctuary in Aotearoa New Zealand. There were fewer than 0.5 detections per year for both predator species from 2004 to 2016, but stoat detections increased &gt;10-fold from 2017 to 2019 and cats &gt;30-fold from 2020 to 2021. We estimated the growth and persistence of each bird population pre- and post-2017. This involved fitting integrated population models to survival, reproduction and count data for toutouwai and tīeke, and fitting a variation of the Moran–Ricker model to 5-min point counts for popokatea. We used these models to derive <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub>, the finite rate of increase at zero density, which must be &gt;1 for a population to persist. Popokatea showed no sign of impacts, with <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> estimated to be 1.68 (95% CRI 1.49–1.97) up to 2017 and 1.87 (1.42–2.62) after 2017. Toutouwai had tentative decreases in survival and reproduction, dropping the estimated <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> from 1.28 (1.10–1.51) to 1.06 (0.83–1.41). Tīeke survival dropped dramatically from 2017 to 2019, but returned to pre-2017 levels when stoats were reduced, but recruitment was reduced and remained low, presumably due to cats. <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> was estimated to be 1.74 (1.04–2.70) on pre-2017 rates; 1.14 (0.80–1.71) if only recruitment were predator-affected; and 0.79 (0.36–1.36) if both adult survival and recruitment were predator-affected. Our results therefore indicated that this level of stoat and cat incursion was inconsequential for popokatea, tentatively reduced toutouwai persistence from safe to marginal, and would have driven tīeke to extinction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50786,"journal":{"name":"Animal Conservation","volume":"28 1","pages":"135-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the impacts of stoat and cat incursions on reintroduced bird populations in a predator-fenced wildlife sanctuary\",\"authors\":\"K.A. Parker,&nbsp;T.G. Lovegrove,&nbsp;M. Maitland,&nbsp;E. Parlato,&nbsp;Z. Stone,&nbsp;D.P. Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acv.13000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Control of introduced predators is essential for conserving many threatened species, but species range in vulnerability. Therefore, efficient conservation management requires estimating the vulnerabilities of different threatened species to introduced predators. Here, we quantify population responses of reintroduced toutouwai (<i>Petroica longipes</i>), popokatea (<i>Mohoua albicilla</i>) and tīeke (<i>Philesturnus rufusater</i>) to incursions of stoats (<i>Mustela erminea</i>) and cats (<i>Felis catus</i>) to a 588-ha predator-fenced sanctuary in Aotearoa New Zealand. There were fewer than 0.5 detections per year for both predator species from 2004 to 2016, but stoat detections increased &gt;10-fold from 2017 to 2019 and cats &gt;30-fold from 2020 to 2021. We estimated the growth and persistence of each bird population pre- and post-2017. This involved fitting integrated population models to survival, reproduction and count data for toutouwai and tīeke, and fitting a variation of the Moran–Ricker model to 5-min point counts for popokatea. We used these models to derive <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub>, the finite rate of increase at zero density, which must be &gt;1 for a population to persist. Popokatea showed no sign of impacts, with <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> estimated to be 1.68 (95% CRI 1.49–1.97) up to 2017 and 1.87 (1.42–2.62) after 2017. Toutouwai had tentative decreases in survival and reproduction, dropping the estimated <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> from 1.28 (1.10–1.51) to 1.06 (0.83–1.41). Tīeke survival dropped dramatically from 2017 to 2019, but returned to pre-2017 levels when stoats were reduced, but recruitment was reduced and remained low, presumably due to cats. <i>λ</i><sub>max</sub> was estimated to be 1.74 (1.04–2.70) on pre-2017 rates; 1.14 (0.80–1.71) if only recruitment were predator-affected; and 0.79 (0.36–1.36) if both adult survival and recruitment were predator-affected. Our results therefore indicated that this level of stoat and cat incursion was inconsequential for popokatea, tentatively reduced toutouwai persistence from safe to marginal, and would have driven tīeke to extinction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Conservation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"135-146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.13000\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acv.13000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

控制引进的捕食者对保护许多濒危物种至关重要,但物种的脆弱性各不相同。因此,有效的保护管理需要评估不同受威胁物种对外来捕食者的脆弱性。在这里,我们量化了在新西兰Aotearoa的一个588公顷的捕食者围成的保护区中,重新引入的土鳖(Petroica longipes), popokatea (Mohoua albicilla)和t . eke (Philesturnus rusfusater)对白鼬(Mustela erminea)和猫(Felis catus)入侵的种群反应。从2004年到2016年,这两种掠食者每年的检测次数都不到0.5次,但从2017年到2019年,白鼬的检测次数增加了10倍,从2020年到2021年,猫的检测次数增加了30倍。我们估计了2017年前后每个鸟类种群的生长和持久性。这包括将综合种群模型拟合到outoutwai和tj - eke的生存、繁殖和计数数据,并将Moran-Ricker模型的一个变体拟合到popokatea的5分钟点数计数。我们用这些模型推导出λmax,即在零密度下的有限增长率,它必须为1才能使种群持续存在。Popokatea没有受到影响的迹象,2017年之前的λmax估计为1.68 (95% CRI 1.49-1.97), 2017年之后为1.87(1.42-2.62)。头头外的存活率和繁殖力均有初步下降,λmax从1.28(1.10-1.51)下降到1.06(0.83-1.41)。从2017年到2019年,鼬鼠的存活率急剧下降,但在白鼬减少后又回到了2017年之前的水平,但招募人数减少并保持在低水平,可能是由于猫的原因。2017年之前,λmax估计为1.74 (1.04-2.70);如果招募受捕食者影响,则为1.14 (0.80-1.71);如果成虫生存和招募均受捕食者影响,则为0.79(0.36 ~ 1.36)。因此,我们的研究结果表明,这种程度的白鼬和猫的入侵对popokatea来说是无关紧要的,暂时将外部持久性从安全降低到边缘,并可能导致tj灭绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Quantifying the impacts of stoat and cat incursions on reintroduced bird populations in a predator-fenced wildlife sanctuary

Quantifying the impacts of stoat and cat incursions on reintroduced bird populations in a predator-fenced wildlife sanctuary

Control of introduced predators is essential for conserving many threatened species, but species range in vulnerability. Therefore, efficient conservation management requires estimating the vulnerabilities of different threatened species to introduced predators. Here, we quantify population responses of reintroduced toutouwai (Petroica longipes), popokatea (Mohoua albicilla) and tīeke (Philesturnus rufusater) to incursions of stoats (Mustela erminea) and cats (Felis catus) to a 588-ha predator-fenced sanctuary in Aotearoa New Zealand. There were fewer than 0.5 detections per year for both predator species from 2004 to 2016, but stoat detections increased >10-fold from 2017 to 2019 and cats >30-fold from 2020 to 2021. We estimated the growth and persistence of each bird population pre- and post-2017. This involved fitting integrated population models to survival, reproduction and count data for toutouwai and tīeke, and fitting a variation of the Moran–Ricker model to 5-min point counts for popokatea. We used these models to derive λmax, the finite rate of increase at zero density, which must be >1 for a population to persist. Popokatea showed no sign of impacts, with λmax estimated to be 1.68 (95% CRI 1.49–1.97) up to 2017 and 1.87 (1.42–2.62) after 2017. Toutouwai had tentative decreases in survival and reproduction, dropping the estimated λmax from 1.28 (1.10–1.51) to 1.06 (0.83–1.41). Tīeke survival dropped dramatically from 2017 to 2019, but returned to pre-2017 levels when stoats were reduced, but recruitment was reduced and remained low, presumably due to cats. λmax was estimated to be 1.74 (1.04–2.70) on pre-2017 rates; 1.14 (0.80–1.71) if only recruitment were predator-affected; and 0.79 (0.36–1.36) if both adult survival and recruitment were predator-affected. Our results therefore indicated that this level of stoat and cat incursion was inconsequential for popokatea, tentatively reduced toutouwai persistence from safe to marginal, and would have driven tīeke to extinction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Conservation
Animal Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Animal Conservation provides a forum for rapid publication of novel, peer-reviewed research into the conservation of animal species and their habitats. The focus is on rigorous quantitative studies of an empirical or theoretical nature, which may relate to populations, species or communities and their conservation. We encourage the submission of single-species papers that have clear broader implications for conservation of other species or systems. A central theme is to publish important new ideas of broad interest and with findings that advance the scientific basis of conservation. Subjects covered include population biology, epidemiology, evolutionary ecology, population genetics, biodiversity, biogeography, palaeobiology and conservation economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信