老挝人民民主共和国城市环境中影响医疗机构选择的因素:定性研究的结果

Amit Aryal , Emma Clarke-Deelder , Doris Osei Afriyie , Souksanh Phommalangsy , Günther Fink
{"title":"老挝人民民主共和国城市环境中影响医疗机构选择的因素:定性研究的结果","authors":"Amit Aryal ,&nbsp;Emma Clarke-Deelder ,&nbsp;Doris Osei Afriyie ,&nbsp;Souksanh Phommalangsy ,&nbsp;Günther Fink","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), health care is provided through a public system comprised of central, provincial and district hospitals, health centers, and a growing private sector. Despite efforts to strengthen primary care, recent data suggests that Laotians often bypass primary care facilities. This study aims to understand the factors influencing health facility selection in an urban setting in Lao PDR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a qualitative study using 16 focus-group discussions in four districts in Vientiane capital. Guided by Constructivist Grounded theory, we analyzed the findings using the Framework Method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed several key factors influencing health facility selection among urban residents of Vientiane capital. Accessibility of care facilities was a primary consideration. Participants preferred tertiary-level hospitals because of their perceived clinical superiority and modern amenities, however, they were unsatisfied with long waiting times, confusing procedures, and demands for informal payments. Lack of respect and empathy drove participants to private providers, which were perceived to be efficient and friendly.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found that key factors influencing facility selection included accessibility, perceived severity of illness, cost, perceived clinical competence of health workers, respectfulness of health workers and staff, standards of health facilities, timeliness of care and personal connections. Among the key findings of this study was that lack of respect and empathy drove individuals towards private providers, which were perceived to offer a friendlier atmosphere. This study underscores the need to consider primary care models that foster a culture of respect and empathy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101183,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Health Systems","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100062"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing healthcare facility selection in an urban setting in Lao PDR: Findings from a qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Amit Aryal ,&nbsp;Emma Clarke-Deelder ,&nbsp;Doris Osei Afriyie ,&nbsp;Souksanh Phommalangsy ,&nbsp;Günther Fink\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), health care is provided through a public system comprised of central, provincial and district hospitals, health centers, and a growing private sector. Despite efforts to strengthen primary care, recent data suggests that Laotians often bypass primary care facilities. This study aims to understand the factors influencing health facility selection in an urban setting in Lao PDR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a qualitative study using 16 focus-group discussions in four districts in Vientiane capital. Guided by Constructivist Grounded theory, we analyzed the findings using the Framework Method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed several key factors influencing health facility selection among urban residents of Vientiane capital. Accessibility of care facilities was a primary consideration. Participants preferred tertiary-level hospitals because of their perceived clinical superiority and modern amenities, however, they were unsatisfied with long waiting times, confusing procedures, and demands for informal payments. Lack of respect and empathy drove participants to private providers, which were perceived to be efficient and friendly.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We found that key factors influencing facility selection included accessibility, perceived severity of illness, cost, perceived clinical competence of health workers, respectfulness of health workers and staff, standards of health facilities, timeliness of care and personal connections. Among the key findings of this study was that lack of respect and empathy drove individuals towards private providers, which were perceived to offer a friendlier atmosphere. This study underscores the need to consider primary care models that foster a culture of respect and empathy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM - Health Systems\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100062\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM - Health Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856225000145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949856225000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors influencing healthcare facility selection in an urban setting in Lao PDR: Findings from a qualitative study

Background

In Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), health care is provided through a public system comprised of central, provincial and district hospitals, health centers, and a growing private sector. Despite efforts to strengthen primary care, recent data suggests that Laotians often bypass primary care facilities. This study aims to understand the factors influencing health facility selection in an urban setting in Lao PDR.

Methods

We conducted a qualitative study using 16 focus-group discussions in four districts in Vientiane capital. Guided by Constructivist Grounded theory, we analyzed the findings using the Framework Method.

Results

The study revealed several key factors influencing health facility selection among urban residents of Vientiane capital. Accessibility of care facilities was a primary consideration. Participants preferred tertiary-level hospitals because of their perceived clinical superiority and modern amenities, however, they were unsatisfied with long waiting times, confusing procedures, and demands for informal payments. Lack of respect and empathy drove participants to private providers, which were perceived to be efficient and friendly.

Conclusion

We found that key factors influencing facility selection included accessibility, perceived severity of illness, cost, perceived clinical competence of health workers, respectfulness of health workers and staff, standards of health facilities, timeliness of care and personal connections. Among the key findings of this study was that lack of respect and empathy drove individuals towards private providers, which were perceived to offer a friendlier atmosphere. This study underscores the need to consider primary care models that foster a culture of respect and empathy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信