地址说明膨胀:有效临床文件的解决方案。

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Nicholas Genes, Joseph Sills, Heather A Heaton, Bradley D Shy, Jean Scofi
{"title":"地址说明膨胀:有效临床文件的解决方案。","authors":"Nicholas Genes, Joseph Sills, Heather A Heaton, Bradley D Shy, Jean Scofi","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical documentation in the United States has grown longer and more difficult to read, a phenomenon described as \"note bloat.\" This issue is especially pronounced in emergency medicine, where high diagnostic uncertainty and brief evaluations demand focused, efficient chart review to inform decision-making. Note bloat arises from multiple factors: efforts to enhance billing, mitigate malpractice risk, and leverage electronic health record tools that improve speed and completeness. We discuss best practices based on available evidence and expert opinion to improve note clarity and concision. Recent E/M coding reforms aim to streamline documentation by prioritizing medical decision-making over details of historical and physical examination, though implementation varies. New technologies such as generative artificial intelligence present opportunities and challenges for documentation practices. Addressing note bloat will require ongoing effort from clinical leadership, electronic health record vendors, and professional organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"6 1","pages":"100031"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing Note Bloat: Solutions for Effective Clinical Documentation.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Genes, Joseph Sills, Heather A Heaton, Bradley D Shy, Jean Scofi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical documentation in the United States has grown longer and more difficult to read, a phenomenon described as \\\"note bloat.\\\" This issue is especially pronounced in emergency medicine, where high diagnostic uncertainty and brief evaluations demand focused, efficient chart review to inform decision-making. Note bloat arises from multiple factors: efforts to enhance billing, mitigate malpractice risk, and leverage electronic health record tools that improve speed and completeness. We discuss best practices based on available evidence and expert opinion to improve note clarity and concision. Recent E/M coding reforms aim to streamline documentation by prioritizing medical decision-making over details of historical and physical examination, though implementation varies. New technologies such as generative artificial intelligence present opportunities and challenges for documentation practices. Addressing note bloat will require ongoing effort from clinical leadership, electronic health record vendors, and professional organizations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"100031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11852943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的临床文件变得越来越长,越来越难以阅读,这种现象被称为“笔记膨胀”。这一问题在急诊医学中尤为突出,在急诊医学中,诊断不确定性高,评估简短,需要集中、有效的图表审查,以便为决策提供信息。注意事项膨胀是由多个因素引起的:加强计费、降低医疗事故风险以及利用提高速度和完整性的电子健康记录工具。我们讨论基于现有证据和专家意见的最佳实践,以提高笔记的清晰度和简洁性。最近的E/M编码改革旨在通过优先考虑医疗决策而不是历史和身体检查的细节来简化文档,尽管实施情况各不相同。新技术如生成人工智能为文档实践提供了机遇和挑战。解决票据膨胀问题需要临床领导、电子健康记录供应商和专业组织的持续努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing Note Bloat: Solutions for Effective Clinical Documentation.

Clinical documentation in the United States has grown longer and more difficult to read, a phenomenon described as "note bloat." This issue is especially pronounced in emergency medicine, where high diagnostic uncertainty and brief evaluations demand focused, efficient chart review to inform decision-making. Note bloat arises from multiple factors: efforts to enhance billing, mitigate malpractice risk, and leverage electronic health record tools that improve speed and completeness. We discuss best practices based on available evidence and expert opinion to improve note clarity and concision. Recent E/M coding reforms aim to streamline documentation by prioritizing medical decision-making over details of historical and physical examination, though implementation varies. New technologies such as generative artificial intelligence present opportunities and challenges for documentation practices. Addressing note bloat will require ongoing effort from clinical leadership, electronic health record vendors, and professional organizations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信