对Stevens-Johnson综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解患者的临床实践指南进行系统回顾、方法学评估和推荐。

Mohammed AlFada, Hend Alotaibi, Sahar Alsharif, Ahmad Hecham Alani, Andrea Andrade-Miranda, Camila Montesinos Guevara, Yaolong Chen, Ruobing Lei, Jorge Acosta-Reyes, Pamela Velásquez-Salazar, Ahmed El-Malky, Yasser S Amer
{"title":"对Stevens-Johnson综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解患者的临床实践指南进行系统回顾、方法学评估和推荐。","authors":"Mohammed AlFada, Hend Alotaibi, Sahar Alsharif, Ahmad Hecham Alani, Andrea Andrade-Miranda, Camila Montesinos Guevara, Yaolong Chen, Ruobing Lei, Jorge Acosta-Reyes, Pamela Velásquez-Salazar, Ahmed El-Malky, Yasser S Amer","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2025.2467751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument (AGREE II) was developed to enhance the methodological rigor of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), aiming to generate trustworthy recommendations for various clinical scenarios. Despite its importance, there exists a gap in the quality of CPGs pertaining to Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS-TEN). The aim of the study was to evaluate SJS-TEN CPGs to shed light on areas for enhancing SJS-TEN guidelines' quality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to identify SJS-TEN CPGs from January 2011 to December 2023 across bibliographic and guideline databases, as well as dermatology association websites. Four reviewers employed the AGREE II instrument to appraise the quality of eligible CPGs. Subsequently, AGREE II domain scores were calculated and their recommendations mapped.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Seven eligible SJS-TEN CPGs reviewed, originating from Europe, North America, Asia, and an authorship Group. The highest AGREE II domain scores were observed in scope and purpose (mean: 63%, standard deviation [SD]: 23.195%) and clarity of presentation (mean: 70%, SD: 14.5%). Conversely, the lowest score was noted in the applicability domain (mean: 28%, SD: 17.44%). Only two guidelines by the British Association of Dermatologists (28.6%) met the 'recommend' level. Recommendations from all CPGs were compared in tabular form.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"36 1","pages":"2467751"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review, methodological appraisal, and recommendation mapping of clinical practice guidelines for managing patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed AlFada, Hend Alotaibi, Sahar Alsharif, Ahmad Hecham Alani, Andrea Andrade-Miranda, Camila Montesinos Guevara, Yaolong Chen, Ruobing Lei, Jorge Acosta-Reyes, Pamela Velásquez-Salazar, Ahmed El-Malky, Yasser S Amer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2025.2467751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument (AGREE II) was developed to enhance the methodological rigor of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), aiming to generate trustworthy recommendations for various clinical scenarios. Despite its importance, there exists a gap in the quality of CPGs pertaining to Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS-TEN). The aim of the study was to evaluate SJS-TEN CPGs to shed light on areas for enhancing SJS-TEN guidelines' quality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted to identify SJS-TEN CPGs from January 2011 to December 2023 across bibliographic and guideline databases, as well as dermatology association websites. Four reviewers employed the AGREE II instrument to appraise the quality of eligible CPGs. Subsequently, AGREE II domain scores were calculated and their recommendations mapped.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Seven eligible SJS-TEN CPGs reviewed, originating from Europe, North America, Asia, and an authorship Group. The highest AGREE II domain scores were observed in scope and purpose (mean: 63%, standard deviation [SD]: 23.195%) and clarity of presentation (mean: 70%, SD: 14.5%). Conversely, the lowest score was noted in the applicability domain (mean: 28%, SD: 17.44%). Only two guidelines by the British Association of Dermatologists (28.6%) met the 'recommend' level. Recommendations from all CPGs were compared in tabular form.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2467751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2467751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2467751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究和评估指南II评估工具(AGREE II)的开发是为了提高临床实践指南(cpg)的方法学严谨性,旨在为各种临床情况产生值得信赖的建议。尽管CPGs很重要,但与Stevens-Johnson综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解(SJS-TEN)相关的CPGs质量存在差距。本研究的目的是评估SJS-TEN指南的CPGs,以揭示SJS-TEN指南质量提升的领域。材料和方法:对2011年1月至2023年12月期间的SJS-TEN CPGs进行系统评价,包括参考文献和指南数据库以及皮肤病协会网站。四名审稿人采用AGREE II仪器评价合格cpg的质量。随后,计算了AGREE II域分数并绘制了它们的推荐值图。结果和结论:7个符合条件的SJS-TEN cpg,来自欧洲、北美、亚洲和一个作者组。在范围和目的(平均值:63%,标准差[SD]: 23.195%)和陈述清晰度(平均值:70%,SD: 14.5%)方面观察到最高的AGREE II域得分。相反,在适用性领域得分最低(平均值:28%,标准差:17.44%)。英国皮肤科医师协会只有两条指南(28.6%)达到了“推荐”水平。所有cpg的建议以表格形式进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic review, methodological appraisal, and recommendation mapping of clinical practice guidelines for managing patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Purpose: The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument (AGREE II) was developed to enhance the methodological rigor of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), aiming to generate trustworthy recommendations for various clinical scenarios. Despite its importance, there exists a gap in the quality of CPGs pertaining to Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS-TEN). The aim of the study was to evaluate SJS-TEN CPGs to shed light on areas for enhancing SJS-TEN guidelines' quality.

Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify SJS-TEN CPGs from January 2011 to December 2023 across bibliographic and guideline databases, as well as dermatology association websites. Four reviewers employed the AGREE II instrument to appraise the quality of eligible CPGs. Subsequently, AGREE II domain scores were calculated and their recommendations mapped.

Results and conclusions: Seven eligible SJS-TEN CPGs reviewed, originating from Europe, North America, Asia, and an authorship Group. The highest AGREE II domain scores were observed in scope and purpose (mean: 63%, standard deviation [SD]: 23.195%) and clarity of presentation (mean: 70%, SD: 14.5%). Conversely, the lowest score was noted in the applicability domain (mean: 28%, SD: 17.44%). Only two guidelines by the British Association of Dermatologists (28.6%) met the 'recommend' level. Recommendations from all CPGs were compared in tabular form.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信