口服固体剂型制造中的混合均匀性和含量均匀性:IQ联盟行业立场文件。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Manel Bautista, Seb Caille, Claudia Corredor, Sankaran Anantharaman, Joseph Bradbury, Bei Chen, W Mark Eickhoff, Gregory Harmon, Mark Johnson, Fasheng Li, Anja Keubler, Laura Pfund, Alexander Russell, Kevin Sutcliffe, Claire Tridon
{"title":"口服固体剂型制造中的混合均匀性和含量均匀性:IQ联盟行业立场文件。","authors":"Manel Bautista, Seb Caille, Claudia Corredor, Sankaran Anantharaman, Joseph Bradbury, Bei Chen, W Mark Eickhoff, Gregory Harmon, Mark Johnson, Fasheng Li, Anja Keubler, Laura Pfund, Alexander Russell, Kevin Sutcliffe, Claire Tridon","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01028-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The IQ Consortium Uniformity Testing Working Group reviewed the current BU and CU testing practices among ten member companies. All ten companies presented their current approach to BU and CU testing at the three stages of Product Lifecycle Management: the Process Design Stage, the Process Qualification Stage, and the Continuous Verification Stage. With this information on hand, the Uniformity Testing Working Group members developed a risk-based approach to BU and CU testing, and proposed innovative methods to reduce or eliminate blend sampling based on risk to Uniformity of Dosage Unit (UDU) testing. This approach uses prior knowledge, mechanistic understanding, and structured risk assessment tools to classify formulations as low-risk or high-risk, thus guiding the testing strategy. A decision tree was outlined on this basis for low-risk and high-risk formulations. The Working Group aims to influence health authorities on the matter, enabling streamlined testing expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 2","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blend Uniformity and Content Uniformity in Oral Solid Dosage Manufacturing: an IQ Consortium Industry Position Paper.\",\"authors\":\"Manel Bautista, Seb Caille, Claudia Corredor, Sankaran Anantharaman, Joseph Bradbury, Bei Chen, W Mark Eickhoff, Gregory Harmon, Mark Johnson, Fasheng Li, Anja Keubler, Laura Pfund, Alexander Russell, Kevin Sutcliffe, Claire Tridon\",\"doi\":\"10.1208/s12248-025-01028-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The IQ Consortium Uniformity Testing Working Group reviewed the current BU and CU testing practices among ten member companies. All ten companies presented their current approach to BU and CU testing at the three stages of Product Lifecycle Management: the Process Design Stage, the Process Qualification Stage, and the Continuous Verification Stage. With this information on hand, the Uniformity Testing Working Group members developed a risk-based approach to BU and CU testing, and proposed innovative methods to reduce or eliminate blend sampling based on risk to Uniformity of Dosage Unit (UDU) testing. This approach uses prior knowledge, mechanistic understanding, and structured risk assessment tools to classify formulations as low-risk or high-risk, thus guiding the testing strategy. A decision tree was outlined on this basis for low-risk and high-risk formulations. The Working Group aims to influence health authorities on the matter, enabling streamlined testing expectations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AAPS Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01028-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01028-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

IQ联盟统一性测试工作组在10个成员公司中审查了当前的BU和CU测试实践。所有10家公司都在产品生命周期管理的三个阶段展示了他们当前的BU和CU测试方法:过程设计阶段、过程确认阶段和持续验证阶段。有了这些信息,均匀性测试工作组成员开发了一种基于风险的BU和CU测试方法,并提出了创新的方法来减少或消除基于剂量单位均匀性(UDU)测试风险的混合采样。该方法使用先验知识、机制理解和结构化风险评估工具来将配方分类为低风险或高风险,从而指导测试策略。在此基础上概述了低风险和高风险配方的决策树。工作组的目标是影响卫生当局处理这一问题,使检测预期得以精简。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blend Uniformity and Content Uniformity in Oral Solid Dosage Manufacturing: an IQ Consortium Industry Position Paper.

The IQ Consortium Uniformity Testing Working Group reviewed the current BU and CU testing practices among ten member companies. All ten companies presented their current approach to BU and CU testing at the three stages of Product Lifecycle Management: the Process Design Stage, the Process Qualification Stage, and the Continuous Verification Stage. With this information on hand, the Uniformity Testing Working Group members developed a risk-based approach to BU and CU testing, and proposed innovative methods to reduce or eliminate blend sampling based on risk to Uniformity of Dosage Unit (UDU) testing. This approach uses prior knowledge, mechanistic understanding, and structured risk assessment tools to classify formulations as low-risk or high-risk, thus guiding the testing strategy. A decision tree was outlined on this basis for low-risk and high-risk formulations. The Working Group aims to influence health authorities on the matter, enabling streamlined testing expectations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信