儿童清醒骨内通路使用骨内麻醉的时间延迟和毒性风险。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Daniel Pfeiffer, Martin Olivieri, Victoria Lieftüchter, Florian Hey, Florian Hoffmann
{"title":"儿童清醒骨内通路使用骨内麻醉的时间延迟和毒性风险。","authors":"Daniel Pfeiffer, Martin Olivieri, Victoria Lieftüchter, Florian Hey, Florian Hoffmann","doi":"10.1007/s00063-025-01253-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraosseous access (IO) is a crucial, life-saving alternative vascular access in paediatric emergency medicine. In awake paediatric patients, the pain of drilling and flushing the marrow cavity are barriers to the use of the IO method or prompt the use of an intraosseous anaesthetic agent, which introduces the risk of dosing errors and drug toxicity. This study aims to identify the frequency of use of anaesthetic agents and analyse the time delay caused by their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective surveillance study analysing all patients, aged > 28 days to 18 years, who received one or more IO attempt(s) in and out of the hospital setting in Germany from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2019 via the reporting mechanism of the German Paediatric Surveillance Unit (GPSU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified 74 patients who received an IO attempt while awake. All patients were younger than 6 years old. Almost every third child (31.6%) was awake during IO use. In 18.9% of all awake patients, an intraosseous anaesthetic was used before the IO was drilled or the marrow cavity was flushed, introducing a significant time delay of approximately 3 min (p = 0.001) compared to IO attempts without intraosseous anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraosseous anaesthesia prolongs the establishment of working vascular access in an emergency and introduces the risk of drug toxicity. To prevent adverse events, particular emphasis must be placed on placement without intraosseous anaesthesia, and alternative pain management (intranasal) must be considered if necessary. Training courses and guidelines should reflect the advised current practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time delay and risk of toxicity of intraosseous anaesthesia use for awake intraosseous access in children.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Pfeiffer, Martin Olivieri, Victoria Lieftüchter, Florian Hey, Florian Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00063-025-01253-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraosseous access (IO) is a crucial, life-saving alternative vascular access in paediatric emergency medicine. In awake paediatric patients, the pain of drilling and flushing the marrow cavity are barriers to the use of the IO method or prompt the use of an intraosseous anaesthetic agent, which introduces the risk of dosing errors and drug toxicity. This study aims to identify the frequency of use of anaesthetic agents and analyse the time delay caused by their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective surveillance study analysing all patients, aged > 28 days to 18 years, who received one or more IO attempt(s) in and out of the hospital setting in Germany from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2019 via the reporting mechanism of the German Paediatric Surveillance Unit (GPSU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified 74 patients who received an IO attempt while awake. All patients were younger than 6 years old. Almost every third child (31.6%) was awake during IO use. In 18.9% of all awake patients, an intraosseous anaesthetic was used before the IO was drilled or the marrow cavity was flushed, introducing a significant time delay of approximately 3 min (p = 0.001) compared to IO attempts without intraosseous anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraosseous anaesthesia prolongs the establishment of working vascular access in an emergency and introduces the risk of drug toxicity. To prevent adverse events, particular emphasis must be placed on placement without intraosseous anaesthesia, and alternative pain management (intranasal) must be considered if necessary. Training courses and guidelines should reflect the advised current practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-025-01253-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-025-01253-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在儿科急诊医学中,骨内通道(IO)是一种至关重要的、挽救生命的替代血管通道。在清醒的儿科患者中,钻孔和冲洗骨髓腔的疼痛是使用骨内麻醉方法的障碍,或促使使用骨内麻醉剂,这带来了剂量错误和药物毒性的风险。本研究旨在确定麻醉药物的使用频率,并分析其使用造成的时间延迟。方法:通过德国儿科监测单位(GPSU)的报告机制,对2017年7月1日至2019年6月30日期间在德国医院内外接受一次或多次IO尝试的所有患者进行前瞻性监测研究,年龄为bb0 28天至18岁。结果:我们的分析确定了74例在清醒状态下接受静脉注射的患者。所有患者年龄均小于6岁。几乎三分之一的儿童(31.6%)在静脉注射期间是清醒的。在所有清醒的患者中,18.9%的患者在钻孔或冲洗骨髓腔之前使用了骨内麻醉,与未使用骨内麻醉的IO尝试相比,引入了大约3 min (p = 0.001)的显着时间延迟。结论:在紧急情况下,骨内麻醉延长了工作血管通路的建立,并引入了药物毒性的风险。为了防止不良事件,必须特别强调在没有骨内麻醉的情况下放置,必要时必须考虑其他疼痛管理(鼻内)。培训课程和指南应反映建议的现行做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time delay and risk of toxicity of intraosseous anaesthesia use for awake intraosseous access in children.

Introduction: Intraosseous access (IO) is a crucial, life-saving alternative vascular access in paediatric emergency medicine. In awake paediatric patients, the pain of drilling and flushing the marrow cavity are barriers to the use of the IO method or prompt the use of an intraosseous anaesthetic agent, which introduces the risk of dosing errors and drug toxicity. This study aims to identify the frequency of use of anaesthetic agents and analyse the time delay caused by their use.

Methods: Prospective surveillance study analysing all patients, aged > 28 days to 18 years, who received one or more IO attempt(s) in and out of the hospital setting in Germany from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2019 via the reporting mechanism of the German Paediatric Surveillance Unit (GPSU).

Results: Our analysis identified 74 patients who received an IO attempt while awake. All patients were younger than 6 years old. Almost every third child (31.6%) was awake during IO use. In 18.9% of all awake patients, an intraosseous anaesthetic was used before the IO was drilled or the marrow cavity was flushed, introducing a significant time delay of approximately 3 min (p = 0.001) compared to IO attempts without intraosseous anaesthesia.

Conclusions: Intraosseous anaesthesia prolongs the establishment of working vascular access in an emergency and introduces the risk of drug toxicity. To prevent adverse events, particular emphasis must be placed on placement without intraosseous anaesthesia, and alternative pain management (intranasal) must be considered if necessary. Training courses and guidelines should reflect the advised current practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信