软组织体积对骨骼充气估算的影响:对化石始祖龙的启示。

IF 5.4 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Maria Grace Burton, Juan Benito, Kirsty Mellor, Emily Smith, Elizabeth Martin-Silverstone, Patrick O'Connor, Daniel J Field
{"title":"软组织体积对骨骼充气估算的影响:对化石始祖龙的启示。","authors":"Maria Grace Burton, Juan Benito, Kirsty Mellor, Emily Smith, Elizabeth Martin-Silverstone, Patrick O'Connor, Daniel J Field","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2023.0428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Air space proportion (ASP), the volume fraction in bone that is occupied by air, is frequently applied as a measure for quantifying the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extant and fossil archosaurs. Nonetheless, ASP estimates rely on a key assumption: that the soft tissue mass within pneumatic bones is negligible, an assumption that has rarely been explicitly acknowledged or tested. Here, we provide the first comparisons between estimated air space proportion (where the internal cavity of a pneumatic bone is assumed to be completely air-filled) and true air space proportion (ASPt, where soft tissues present within the internal cavities of fresh specimens are considered). Using birds as model archosaurs exhibiting postcranial skeletal pneumaticity, we find that estimates of ASPt are significantly lower than estimates of ASP, raising an important consideration that should be acknowledged in investigations of the evolution of skeletal pneumaticity and bulk skeletal density in extinct archosaurs, as well as in volume-based estimates of archosaur body mass. We advocate for the difference between ASP and ASPt to be explicitly acknowledged in studies seeking to quantify the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extinct archosaurs, to avoid the risk of systematically overestimating the volume fraction of pneumatic bones composed of air.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19872,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"380 1920","pages":"20230428"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of soft tissue volume on estimates of skeletal pneumaticity: implications for fossil archosaurs.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Grace Burton, Juan Benito, Kirsty Mellor, Emily Smith, Elizabeth Martin-Silverstone, Patrick O'Connor, Daniel J Field\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rstb.2023.0428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Air space proportion (ASP), the volume fraction in bone that is occupied by air, is frequently applied as a measure for quantifying the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extant and fossil archosaurs. Nonetheless, ASP estimates rely on a key assumption: that the soft tissue mass within pneumatic bones is negligible, an assumption that has rarely been explicitly acknowledged or tested. Here, we provide the first comparisons between estimated air space proportion (where the internal cavity of a pneumatic bone is assumed to be completely air-filled) and true air space proportion (ASPt, where soft tissues present within the internal cavities of fresh specimens are considered). Using birds as model archosaurs exhibiting postcranial skeletal pneumaticity, we find that estimates of ASPt are significantly lower than estimates of ASP, raising an important consideration that should be acknowledged in investigations of the evolution of skeletal pneumaticity and bulk skeletal density in extinct archosaurs, as well as in volume-based estimates of archosaur body mass. We advocate for the difference between ASP and ASPt to be explicitly acknowledged in studies seeking to quantify the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extinct archosaurs, to avoid the risk of systematically overestimating the volume fraction of pneumatic bones composed of air.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"380 1920\",\"pages\":\"20230428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864828/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

空气空间比例(ASP)是骨骼中被空气占据的体积分数,经常被用作量化现存和化石祖龙骨骼充气程度的一种测量方法。然而,ASP的估计依赖于一个关键的假设:气动骨内的软组织质量可以忽略不计,这个假设很少被明确承认或测试。在这里,我们提供了估计的空气空间比例(假设充气骨的内腔完全充满空气)和真实的空气空间比例(ASPt,其中新鲜标本的内腔内存在软组织)之间的第一次比较。我们使用鸟类作为表现出颅后骨骼充气的祖龙模型,发现对ASP的估计明显低于对ASP的估计,这在研究已灭绝的祖龙骨骼充气和总体骨骼密度的进化以及基于体积的祖龙体重估计中提出了一个重要的考虑因素。我们主张在研究中明确承认ASP和ASP之间的差异,以量化已灭绝的祖龙骨骼气动的程度,以避免系统地高估由空气组成的气动骨骼的体积分数的风险。本文是“鸟类呼吸系统生物学”专题的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of soft tissue volume on estimates of skeletal pneumaticity: implications for fossil archosaurs.

Air space proportion (ASP), the volume fraction in bone that is occupied by air, is frequently applied as a measure for quantifying the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extant and fossil archosaurs. Nonetheless, ASP estimates rely on a key assumption: that the soft tissue mass within pneumatic bones is negligible, an assumption that has rarely been explicitly acknowledged or tested. Here, we provide the first comparisons between estimated air space proportion (where the internal cavity of a pneumatic bone is assumed to be completely air-filled) and true air space proportion (ASPt, where soft tissues present within the internal cavities of fresh specimens are considered). Using birds as model archosaurs exhibiting postcranial skeletal pneumaticity, we find that estimates of ASPt are significantly lower than estimates of ASP, raising an important consideration that should be acknowledged in investigations of the evolution of skeletal pneumaticity and bulk skeletal density in extinct archosaurs, as well as in volume-based estimates of archosaur body mass. We advocate for the difference between ASP and ASPt to be explicitly acknowledged in studies seeking to quantify the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extinct archosaurs, to avoid the risk of systematically overestimating the volume fraction of pneumatic bones composed of air.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes topics across the life sciences. As long as the core subject lies within the biological sciences, some issues may also include content crossing into other areas such as the physical sciences, social sciences, biophysics, policy, economics etc. Issues generally sit within four broad areas (although many issues sit across these areas): Organismal, environmental and evolutionary biology Neuroscience and cognition Cellular, molecular and developmental biology Health and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信