{"title":"Continuous vital sign monitoring with Biobeat<sup>®</sup> wearable devices for post-ambulatory surgery patients: a pilot feasibility study.","authors":"Julien Belliveau, Léo Pilote, Elliot Grange, Cédrick Zaouter, Maxim Roy, Florian Robin","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01276-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improvement in anesthesia and surgical practices has enabled more patients, including those undergoing higher-risk surgeries, to be treated in outpatient settings. This shift creates a need for reliable postoperative monitoring at home. Wearable devices like the Biobeat<sup>®</sup> offer continuous, real-time monitoring of vital signs have remained largely untested for home use in this context.A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) from February to August 2023. Fifty eligible patients underwent continuous monitoring with the Biobeat<sup>®</sup> device for five days post-surgery, with data transmitted to CHUM's telehealth service. Feasibility was assessed by the percentage of patients without data loss during consecutive 2-hour intervals.Of the 50 patients enrolled, 49 completed the study, but all experienced some level of data loss. While 39.6% of patients maintained connectivity without complete data loss for 6-8-hour intervals, challenges included device discomfort, Bluetooth disconnection, and connectivity issues. Thirteen patients removed the device early due to discomfort or technical issues. Of the 3 patients who experienced post-operative complications, no data was available within 24 h prior to the episodes. Continuous vital signs monitoring is feasible for high-risk outpatient surgery patients; however, significant improvements are required in device reliability and data accessibility. Further studies are needed to refine the technology and develop reliable protocols for postoperative monitoring in the home setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01276-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuous vital sign monitoring with Biobeat® wearable devices for post-ambulatory surgery patients: a pilot feasibility study.
Improvement in anesthesia and surgical practices has enabled more patients, including those undergoing higher-risk surgeries, to be treated in outpatient settings. This shift creates a need for reliable postoperative monitoring at home. Wearable devices like the Biobeat® offer continuous, real-time monitoring of vital signs have remained largely untested for home use in this context.A prospective, single-center observational study was conducted at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) from February to August 2023. Fifty eligible patients underwent continuous monitoring with the Biobeat® device for five days post-surgery, with data transmitted to CHUM's telehealth service. Feasibility was assessed by the percentage of patients without data loss during consecutive 2-hour intervals.Of the 50 patients enrolled, 49 completed the study, but all experienced some level of data loss. While 39.6% of patients maintained connectivity without complete data loss for 6-8-hour intervals, challenges included device discomfort, Bluetooth disconnection, and connectivity issues. Thirteen patients removed the device early due to discomfort or technical issues. Of the 3 patients who experienced post-operative complications, no data was available within 24 h prior to the episodes. Continuous vital signs monitoring is feasible for high-risk outpatient surgery patients; however, significant improvements are required in device reliability and data accessibility. Further studies are needed to refine the technology and develop reliable protocols for postoperative monitoring in the home setting.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.