Sikander Ailawadhi, Timothy J Inocencio, Carol Mansfield, Phani Chintakayala, Cooper Bussberg, Lei Chi, James Harnett, Glenn S Kroog, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc, Qiufei Ma
{"title":"患者对三级暴露的复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗的偏好:一项离散选择研究。","authors":"Sikander Ailawadhi, Timothy J Inocencio, Carol Mansfield, Phani Chintakayala, Cooper Bussberg, Lei Chi, James Harnett, Glenn S Kroog, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc, Qiufei Ma","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To quantify patient preferences for attributes of novel treatments for triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a discrete-choice experiment, we elicited preferences for 7 attributes: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), all-grade cytokine release syndrome risk, all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome risk, serious infection risk (grade 3+), treatment administration, and initial hospitalization requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS was the most important attribute (conditional relative importance [CRI] 32.0% for a 24-month increase), followed by serious infection risk (CRI 17.3% for avoiding a 60% risk), initial hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0% for avoiding 14 days of initial hospitalization), and ORR (CRI 13.7% for a 38% increase). Based on differences between relative preference weights, fewer initial hospitalization days when starting treatment and off-the-shelf (vs. chimeric antigen receptor T [CAR T] cell-like) options were significantly preferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapy decisions for patients with TCE RRMM should consider tradeoffs between efficacy, safety, and attributes related to treatment process and initial monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"853-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient preferences for triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treatment: a discrete-choice study.\",\"authors\":\"Sikander Ailawadhi, Timothy J Inocencio, Carol Mansfield, Phani Chintakayala, Cooper Bussberg, Lei Chi, James Harnett, Glenn S Kroog, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc, Qiufei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To quantify patient preferences for attributes of novel treatments for triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a discrete-choice experiment, we elicited preferences for 7 attributes: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), all-grade cytokine release syndrome risk, all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome risk, serious infection risk (grade 3+), treatment administration, and initial hospitalization requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS was the most important attribute (conditional relative importance [CRI] 32.0% for a 24-month increase), followed by serious infection risk (CRI 17.3% for avoiding a 60% risk), initial hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0% for avoiding 14 days of initial hospitalization), and ORR (CRI 13.7% for a 38% increase). Based on differences between relative preference weights, fewer initial hospitalization days when starting treatment and off-the-shelf (vs. chimeric antigen receptor T [CAR T] cell-like) options were significantly preferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapy decisions for patients with TCE RRMM should consider tradeoffs between efficacy, safety, and attributes related to treatment process and initial monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"853-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient preferences for triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treatment: a discrete-choice study.
Aims: To quantify patient preferences for attributes of novel treatments for triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Methods: Using a discrete-choice experiment, we elicited preferences for 7 attributes: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), all-grade cytokine release syndrome risk, all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome risk, serious infection risk (grade 3+), treatment administration, and initial hospitalization requirements.
Results: OS was the most important attribute (conditional relative importance [CRI] 32.0% for a 24-month increase), followed by serious infection risk (CRI 17.3% for avoiding a 60% risk), initial hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0% for avoiding 14 days of initial hospitalization), and ORR (CRI 13.7% for a 38% increase). Based on differences between relative preference weights, fewer initial hospitalization days when starting treatment and off-the-shelf (vs. chimeric antigen receptor T [CAR T] cell-like) options were significantly preferred.
Conclusions: Therapy decisions for patients with TCE RRMM should consider tradeoffs between efficacy, safety, and attributes related to treatment process and initial monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community.
The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.