患者对三级暴露的复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗的偏好:一项离散选择研究。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Future oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430
Sikander Ailawadhi, Timothy J Inocencio, Carol Mansfield, Phani Chintakayala, Cooper Bussberg, Lei Chi, James Harnett, Glenn S Kroog, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc, Qiufei Ma
{"title":"患者对三级暴露的复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗的偏好:一项离散选择研究。","authors":"Sikander Ailawadhi, Timothy J Inocencio, Carol Mansfield, Phani Chintakayala, Cooper Bussberg, Lei Chi, James Harnett, Glenn S Kroog, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc, Qiufei Ma","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To quantify patient preferences for attributes of novel treatments for triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a discrete-choice experiment, we elicited preferences for 7 attributes: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), all-grade cytokine release syndrome risk, all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome risk, serious infection risk (grade 3+), treatment administration, and initial hospitalization requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS was the most important attribute (conditional relative importance [CRI] 32.0% for a 24-month increase), followed by serious infection risk (CRI 17.3% for avoiding a 60% risk), initial hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0% for avoiding 14 days of initial hospitalization), and ORR (CRI 13.7% for a 38% increase). Based on differences between relative preference weights, fewer initial hospitalization days when starting treatment and off-the-shelf (vs. chimeric antigen receptor T [CAR T] cell-like) options were significantly preferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapy decisions for patients with TCE RRMM should consider tradeoffs between efficacy, safety, and attributes related to treatment process and initial monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"853-865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient preferences for triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treatment: a discrete-choice study.\",\"authors\":\"Sikander Ailawadhi, Timothy J Inocencio, Carol Mansfield, Phani Chintakayala, Cooper Bussberg, Lei Chi, James Harnett, Glenn S Kroog, Karen Rodriguez-Lorenc, Qiufei Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To quantify patient preferences for attributes of novel treatments for triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a discrete-choice experiment, we elicited preferences for 7 attributes: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), all-grade cytokine release syndrome risk, all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome risk, serious infection risk (grade 3+), treatment administration, and initial hospitalization requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OS was the most important attribute (conditional relative importance [CRI] 32.0% for a 24-month increase), followed by serious infection risk (CRI 17.3% for avoiding a 60% risk), initial hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0% for avoiding 14 days of initial hospitalization), and ORR (CRI 13.7% for a 38% increase). Based on differences between relative preference weights, fewer initial hospitalization days when starting treatment and off-the-shelf (vs. chimeric antigen receptor T [CAR T] cell-like) options were significantly preferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Therapy decisions for patients with TCE RRMM should consider tradeoffs between efficacy, safety, and attributes related to treatment process and initial monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"853-865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2461430","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:量化患者对治疗复发和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)的三重暴露(TCE)新型疗法属性的偏好:通过离散选择实验,我们了解了患者对7项属性的偏好:客观反应率(ORR)、总生存期(OS)、所有等级细胞因子释放综合征风险、所有等级免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征风险、严重感染风险(3+级)、治疗管理和初始住院要求:OS是最重要的属性(条件相对重要性[CRI]32.0%,增加24个月),其次是严重感染风险(CRI 17.3%,避免60%的风险)、初始住院要求(CRI 15.0%,避免14天的初始住院)和ORR(CRI 13.7%,增加38%)。根据相对偏好权重之间的差异,开始治疗时较少的初始住院天数和现成的(与嵌合抗原受体T[CAR T]细胞类似的)方案明显更受青睐:结论:TCE RRMM患者的治疗决策应考虑疗效、安全性以及治疗过程和初始监测相关属性之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient preferences for triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treatment: a discrete-choice study.

Aims: To quantify patient preferences for attributes of novel treatments for triple-class-exposed (TCE) relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Methods: Using a discrete-choice experiment, we elicited preferences for 7 attributes: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), all-grade cytokine release syndrome risk, all-grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome risk, serious infection risk (grade 3+), treatment administration, and initial hospitalization requirements.

Results: OS was the most important attribute (conditional relative importance [CRI] 32.0% for a 24-month increase), followed by serious infection risk (CRI 17.3% for avoiding a 60% risk), initial hospitalization requirements (CRI 15.0% for avoiding 14 days of initial hospitalization), and ORR (CRI 13.7% for a 38% increase). Based on differences between relative preference weights, fewer initial hospitalization days when starting treatment and off-the-shelf (vs. chimeric antigen receptor T [CAR T] cell-like) options were significantly preferred.

Conclusions: Therapy decisions for patients with TCE RRMM should consider tradeoffs between efficacy, safety, and attributes related to treatment process and initial monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信