{"title":"牛津视觉感知屏幕:视觉感知困难的标准化评估的发展和规范数据。","authors":"Kathleen Vancleef, Ruby Castellani, Rebecca Shorthose, Catherine Guo, Merak Fulin Cai, Federica Guazzo, Nele Demeyere","doi":"10.1177/02692155251315606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveWe aimed to develop and standardise a practical systematic screening tool for visual perception impairments after a stroke to replace current subjective methods.DesignA mixed methods study including a cross-sectional study and a case series.SettingIn the community and on stroke rehabilitation units.ParticipantsOlder volunteers without a neurological history contributed to normative data. Patients with ocular conditions or a stroke took part in our case series.InstrumentThe Oxford Visual Perception Screen.Main measuresFor each task of the Oxford Visual Perception Screen, we determined 5<sup>th</sup> centile cut-off scores. We further explored effects of age, visual acuity and gender on visual perception through generalised linear models.ResultsOxford Visual Perception Screen is a 15-min paper-and-pen assessment comprising 10 tasks including picture naming, star counting and reading. Normative data of 107 participants demonstrated persistent high performance with most cut-offs near ceiling. Apart from the Figure Copy (<i>Z</i> = 6.57, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Global Shape Perception task (<i>Z</i> = 3.32, <i>p</i> < 0.001) we found no evidence for an effect of visual acuity on OxVPS. An effect of age was only observed in the Face Recognition (<i>Z</i> = 3.61, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Reading task (<i>Z</i> = -3.50, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No effects of gender were observed. A series of eight cases illustrates the interpretation of OxVPS.ConclusionWe present the Oxford Visual Perception Screen, a standardised visual perception screening tool alongside normative data and illustrative cases. The Oxford Visual Perception Screen can potentially change screening for visual perception impairments in clinical practice and is available at https://oxvps.webspace.durham.ac.uk/.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"471-485"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Oxford Visual Perception Screen: Development and normative data of a standardised assessment for visual perception difficulties.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen Vancleef, Ruby Castellani, Rebecca Shorthose, Catherine Guo, Merak Fulin Cai, Federica Guazzo, Nele Demeyere\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251315606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveWe aimed to develop and standardise a practical systematic screening tool for visual perception impairments after a stroke to replace current subjective methods.DesignA mixed methods study including a cross-sectional study and a case series.SettingIn the community and on stroke rehabilitation units.ParticipantsOlder volunteers without a neurological history contributed to normative data. Patients with ocular conditions or a stroke took part in our case series.InstrumentThe Oxford Visual Perception Screen.Main measuresFor each task of the Oxford Visual Perception Screen, we determined 5<sup>th</sup> centile cut-off scores. We further explored effects of age, visual acuity and gender on visual perception through generalised linear models.ResultsOxford Visual Perception Screen is a 15-min paper-and-pen assessment comprising 10 tasks including picture naming, star counting and reading. Normative data of 107 participants demonstrated persistent high performance with most cut-offs near ceiling. Apart from the Figure Copy (<i>Z</i> = 6.57, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Global Shape Perception task (<i>Z</i> = 3.32, <i>p</i> < 0.001) we found no evidence for an effect of visual acuity on OxVPS. An effect of age was only observed in the Face Recognition (<i>Z</i> = 3.61, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and Reading task (<i>Z</i> = -3.50, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No effects of gender were observed. A series of eight cases illustrates the interpretation of OxVPS.ConclusionWe present the Oxford Visual Perception Screen, a standardised visual perception screening tool alongside normative data and illustrative cases. The Oxford Visual Perception Screen can potentially change screening for visual perception impairments in clinical practice and is available at https://oxvps.webspace.durham.ac.uk/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"471-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018711/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251315606\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251315606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们的目的是开发和标准化一种实用的系统筛查工具,以取代目前的主观方法脑卒中后视觉感知障碍。设计:混合方法研究,包括横断面研究和案例系列。环境:在社区和中风康复单位。参与者:无神经病史的老年志愿者提供规范数据。患有眼部疾病或中风的患者参与了我们的病例系列。仪器:牛津视觉感知屏。主要测量:对于牛津视觉感知屏幕的每个任务,我们确定了第5百分位的截止分数。通过广义线性模型进一步探讨了年龄、视敏度和性别对视觉感知的影响。结果:牛津视觉感知屏幕是一个15分钟的纸笔评估,包括10个任务,包括图片命名,星星计数和阅读。107名参与者的标准数据显示出持续的高绩效,大多数截止值接近天花板。除了图副本(Z = 6.57, p Z = 3.32, p < 0.001)外,我们没有发现视力对OxVPS有影响的证据。年龄的影响仅在面部识别中观察到(Z = 3.61, p Z = -3.50, p)。结论:我们提出了牛津视觉感知屏幕,一种标准化的视觉感知筛选工具,以及规范数据和说明性案例。牛津视觉感知屏幕可以潜在地改变临床实践中视觉感知障碍的筛查,并可在https://oxvps.webspace.durham.ac.uk/上获得。
The Oxford Visual Perception Screen: Development and normative data of a standardised assessment for visual perception difficulties.
ObjectiveWe aimed to develop and standardise a practical systematic screening tool for visual perception impairments after a stroke to replace current subjective methods.DesignA mixed methods study including a cross-sectional study and a case series.SettingIn the community and on stroke rehabilitation units.ParticipantsOlder volunteers without a neurological history contributed to normative data. Patients with ocular conditions or a stroke took part in our case series.InstrumentThe Oxford Visual Perception Screen.Main measuresFor each task of the Oxford Visual Perception Screen, we determined 5th centile cut-off scores. We further explored effects of age, visual acuity and gender on visual perception through generalised linear models.ResultsOxford Visual Perception Screen is a 15-min paper-and-pen assessment comprising 10 tasks including picture naming, star counting and reading. Normative data of 107 participants demonstrated persistent high performance with most cut-offs near ceiling. Apart from the Figure Copy (Z = 6.57, p < 0.001) and Global Shape Perception task (Z = 3.32, p < 0.001) we found no evidence for an effect of visual acuity on OxVPS. An effect of age was only observed in the Face Recognition (Z = 3.61, p < 0.001) and Reading task (Z = -3.50, p < 0.001). No effects of gender were observed. A series of eight cases illustrates the interpretation of OxVPS.ConclusionWe present the Oxford Visual Perception Screen, a standardised visual perception screening tool alongside normative data and illustrative cases. The Oxford Visual Perception Screen can potentially change screening for visual perception impairments in clinical practice and is available at https://oxvps.webspace.durham.ac.uk/.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)