两袋和三袋乙酰半胱氨酸方案治疗扑热息痛中毒的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2025.2456116
Larissa Nakatsu, Josh R Lopez, Christian Mateo Garcia, Mathew Cherian, Jacob Nash, Davood Tofighi, Steven A Seifert, Susan Smolinske, Brandon J Warrick
{"title":"两袋和三袋乙酰半胱氨酸方案治疗扑热息痛中毒的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Larissa Nakatsu, Josh R Lopez, Christian Mateo Garcia, Mathew Cherian, Jacob Nash, Davood Tofighi, Steven A Seifert, Susan Smolinske, Brandon J Warrick","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2025.2456116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Worldwide, paracetamol poisoning is a common cause of acute liver failure and referral to transplant centers. Acetylcysteine has long been the mainstay of treatment, but recent literature suggests that a simplification of the \"three-bag\" method may decrease adverse effects. Our primary hypothesis is that a simplified dosing regimen (two-bag regimen) is non-inferior to the three-bag method in preventing liver injury. Our secondary hypothesis is that a simplified regimen will have lower rates of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched Medline/PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Embase and Toxnet on May 23, 2022. The Medical Subject Headings terms were NAC, acetaminophen toxicity, acetyl-cysteine, N-acetylcysteine, paracetamol, APAP, 2-bag, and 3-bag. The Embase terms were acetylcysteine, NAC, 2-bag, two bag, 3-bag, three bag, simplified dosing, acetaminophen, Tylenol<sup>®</sup>, paracetamol, APAP, drug overdose, poisoning, and overdose. Studies included both non-United States Food and Drug Administration-approved and United States Food and Drug Administration-approved acetylcysteine regimens. Case reports, review articles, and animal studies were excluded. Two authors independently reviewed each study using Rayyan QCRI to determine if the studies met search criteria while blinded to the selections of each other. The two authors discussed until reaching a consensus. We used a primary outcome of non-inferiority of hepatotoxicity. We used secondary outcomes of non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and adverse events. We conducted a fixed-effect meta-analysis using R package meta. To visually summarize the meta-analysis results, we also produced forest plots. We used Cochran's Q test and <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> statistical analysis to assess heterogeneity between the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search resulted in 657 total citations, which were reduced to unique citations. Of the 643 studies, 46 met the criteria for full text review, and eight met the study criteria. Of the eight studies investigating a simplified acetylcysteine regimen, four studies utilized some form of a modified two-bag infusion regimen, varying in duration or dosing of infusions, and four studies shared the same \"common\" two-bag treatment, a regimen that delivers acetylcysteine 200 mg/kg over 4 h, followed by 100 mg/kg acetylcysteine over 16 h. The six studies comparing a two-bag dosing regimen to the three-bag technique were utilized for our random effect model meta-analysis. We found no significant heterogeneity amongst the six studies for either hepatotoxicity (<i>Q</i>(5) = 1.11; <i>P</i> = 0.95; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 0%; 95% CI: 0%-74.6%) or non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and adverse events (<i>Q</i>(5) = 10.15; <i>P</i> = 0.07; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 50.7%; 95% CI: 0%-80.4%). Compared to the traditional three-bag dosing regimen, the two-bag method did not demonstrate a difference in relative risk for hepatotoxicity (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72-1.08; <i>P</i> = 0.23) but did demonstrate a significantly decreased likelihood of non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and other adverse events (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.17-0.35; <i>P</i> <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The two-bag method is a safe and effective treatment for acute paracetamol poisoning. The two-bag regimen is correlated with a significant reduction in non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions, compared to the three-bag method, and is non-inferior with respect to hepatotoxicity. While we feel this information is practice changing for many, further research in the form of a randomized control trial would be beneficial to compare even more abbreviated methods such as a \"single bag method.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two-bag acetylcysteine dosing regimens appear to be non-inferior to the three-bag method with respect to hepatotoxicity, and result in fewer anaphylactoid, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"155-165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two-bag and three-bag acetylcysteine regimens in the treatment of paracetamol poisoning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Nakatsu, Josh R Lopez, Christian Mateo Garcia, Mathew Cherian, Jacob Nash, Davood Tofighi, Steven A Seifert, Susan Smolinske, Brandon J Warrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15563650.2025.2456116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Worldwide, paracetamol poisoning is a common cause of acute liver failure and referral to transplant centers. Acetylcysteine has long been the mainstay of treatment, but recent literature suggests that a simplification of the \\\"three-bag\\\" method may decrease adverse effects. Our primary hypothesis is that a simplified dosing regimen (two-bag regimen) is non-inferior to the three-bag method in preventing liver injury. Our secondary hypothesis is that a simplified regimen will have lower rates of adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched Medline/PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Embase and Toxnet on May 23, 2022. The Medical Subject Headings terms were NAC, acetaminophen toxicity, acetyl-cysteine, N-acetylcysteine, paracetamol, APAP, 2-bag, and 3-bag. The Embase terms were acetylcysteine, NAC, 2-bag, two bag, 3-bag, three bag, simplified dosing, acetaminophen, Tylenol<sup>®</sup>, paracetamol, APAP, drug overdose, poisoning, and overdose. Studies included both non-United States Food and Drug Administration-approved and United States Food and Drug Administration-approved acetylcysteine regimens. Case reports, review articles, and animal studies were excluded. Two authors independently reviewed each study using Rayyan QCRI to determine if the studies met search criteria while blinded to the selections of each other. The two authors discussed until reaching a consensus. We used a primary outcome of non-inferiority of hepatotoxicity. We used secondary outcomes of non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and adverse events. We conducted a fixed-effect meta-analysis using R package meta. To visually summarize the meta-analysis results, we also produced forest plots. We used Cochran's Q test and <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> statistical analysis to assess heterogeneity between the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search resulted in 657 total citations, which were reduced to unique citations. Of the 643 studies, 46 met the criteria for full text review, and eight met the study criteria. Of the eight studies investigating a simplified acetylcysteine regimen, four studies utilized some form of a modified two-bag infusion regimen, varying in duration or dosing of infusions, and four studies shared the same \\\"common\\\" two-bag treatment, a regimen that delivers acetylcysteine 200 mg/kg over 4 h, followed by 100 mg/kg acetylcysteine over 16 h. The six studies comparing a two-bag dosing regimen to the three-bag technique were utilized for our random effect model meta-analysis. We found no significant heterogeneity amongst the six studies for either hepatotoxicity (<i>Q</i>(5) = 1.11; <i>P</i> = 0.95; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 0%; 95% CI: 0%-74.6%) or non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and adverse events (<i>Q</i>(5) = 10.15; <i>P</i> = 0.07; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> = 50.7%; 95% CI: 0%-80.4%). Compared to the traditional three-bag dosing regimen, the two-bag method did not demonstrate a difference in relative risk for hepatotoxicity (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72-1.08; <i>P</i> = 0.23) but did demonstrate a significantly decreased likelihood of non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and other adverse events (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.17-0.35; <i>P</i> <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The two-bag method is a safe and effective treatment for acute paracetamol poisoning. The two-bag regimen is correlated with a significant reduction in non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions, compared to the three-bag method, and is non-inferior with respect to hepatotoxicity. While we feel this information is practice changing for many, further research in the form of a randomized control trial would be beneficial to compare even more abbreviated methods such as a \\\"single bag method.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two-bag acetylcysteine dosing regimens appear to be non-inferior to the three-bag method with respect to hepatotoxicity, and result in fewer anaphylactoid, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"155-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2025.2456116\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2025.2456116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在世界范围内,扑热息痛中毒是急性肝衰竭和转介到移植中心的常见原因。长期以来,乙酰半胱氨酸一直是治疗的主要药物,但最近的文献表明,简化“三袋”方法可能会减少不良反应。我们的主要假设是,简化给药方案(两袋方案)在预防肝损伤方面不逊色于三袋方法。我们的第二个假设是,简化的治疗方案会降低不良反应的发生率。方法:根据系统评价和meta分析指南的首选报告项目,我们于2022年5月23日检索了Medline/PubMed、谷歌、谷歌Scholar、Cochrane Library、Embase和Toxnet。医学主题词为NAC、对乙酰氨基酚毒性、乙酰半胱氨酸、n -乙酰半胱氨酸、扑热息痛、APAP、2袋和3袋。Embase术语为乙酰半胱氨酸、NAC、2袋、2袋、3袋、3袋、简化给药、对乙酰氨基酚、泰诺®、扑热息痛、APAP、药物过量、中毒、过量。研究包括非美国食品和药物管理局批准的和美国食品和药物管理局批准的乙酰半胱氨酸方案。病例报告、综述文章和动物研究被排除在外。两位作者在对彼此的选择不知情的情况下,使用Rayyan QCRI独立审查了每项研究,以确定这些研究是否符合搜索标准。两位作者讨论直至达成共识。我们使用了肝毒性的非劣效性的主要终点。我们使用非过敏性类过敏反应和不良事件的次要结局。我们使用R软件包meta进行固定效应meta分析。为了直观地总结meta分析结果,我们还制作了森林图。我们采用Cochran’s Q检验和I2统计分析来评估研究之间的异质性。结果:我们的搜索得到了657个总引用,这些引用被减少为唯一引用。在643项研究中,46项符合全文审查的标准,8项符合研究标准。在调查简化乙酰半胱氨酸方案的8项研究中,有4项研究使用了某种形式的改良两袋输注方案,在输注的持续时间或剂量上有所不同,还有4项研究使用了相同的“常见”两袋治疗方案,即在4小时内输送乙酰半胱氨酸200 mg/kg,然后在16小时内输送100 mg/kg乙酰半胱氨酸。比较两袋给药方案和三袋给药方案的六项研究被用于我们的随机效应模型荟萃分析。我们发现6项研究在肝毒性方面没有显著的异质性(Q(5) = 1.11;p = 0.95;I2 = 0%;95% CI: 0%-74.6%)或非过敏性类过敏反应和不良事件(Q(5) = 10.15;p = 0.07;I2 = 50.7%;95% ci: 0%-80.4%)。与传统的三袋给药方案相比,两袋给药方法在肝毒性的相对风险方面没有差异(OR: 0.88;95% ci: 0.72-1.08;P = 0.23),但确实显示非过敏性类过敏反应和其他不良事件的可能性显著降低(OR: 0.24;95% ci: 0.17-0.35;讨论:双袋法是治疗急性扑热息痛中毒安全有效的方法。与三袋方法相比,两袋方案与非过敏性类过敏反应的显著减少相关,并且在肝毒性方面不差。虽然我们认为这一信息对许多人来说是实践的改变,但以随机对照试验的形式进行的进一步研究将有利于比较更简短的方法,如“单袋法”。结论:两袋乙酰半胱氨酸给药方案在肝毒性方面不逊于三袋给药方案,且引起的类过敏反应、皮肤反应和胃肠道反应较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of two-bag and three-bag acetylcysteine regimens in the treatment of paracetamol poisoning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Worldwide, paracetamol poisoning is a common cause of acute liver failure and referral to transplant centers. Acetylcysteine has long been the mainstay of treatment, but recent literature suggests that a simplification of the "three-bag" method may decrease adverse effects. Our primary hypothesis is that a simplified dosing regimen (two-bag regimen) is non-inferior to the three-bag method in preventing liver injury. Our secondary hypothesis is that a simplified regimen will have lower rates of adverse effects.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we searched Medline/PubMed, Google, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Embase and Toxnet on May 23, 2022. The Medical Subject Headings terms were NAC, acetaminophen toxicity, acetyl-cysteine, N-acetylcysteine, paracetamol, APAP, 2-bag, and 3-bag. The Embase terms were acetylcysteine, NAC, 2-bag, two bag, 3-bag, three bag, simplified dosing, acetaminophen, Tylenol®, paracetamol, APAP, drug overdose, poisoning, and overdose. Studies included both non-United States Food and Drug Administration-approved and United States Food and Drug Administration-approved acetylcysteine regimens. Case reports, review articles, and animal studies were excluded. Two authors independently reviewed each study using Rayyan QCRI to determine if the studies met search criteria while blinded to the selections of each other. The two authors discussed until reaching a consensus. We used a primary outcome of non-inferiority of hepatotoxicity. We used secondary outcomes of non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and adverse events. We conducted a fixed-effect meta-analysis using R package meta. To visually summarize the meta-analysis results, we also produced forest plots. We used Cochran's Q test and I2 statistical analysis to assess heterogeneity between the studies.

Results: Our search resulted in 657 total citations, which were reduced to unique citations. Of the 643 studies, 46 met the criteria for full text review, and eight met the study criteria. Of the eight studies investigating a simplified acetylcysteine regimen, four studies utilized some form of a modified two-bag infusion regimen, varying in duration or dosing of infusions, and four studies shared the same "common" two-bag treatment, a regimen that delivers acetylcysteine 200 mg/kg over 4 h, followed by 100 mg/kg acetylcysteine over 16 h. The six studies comparing a two-bag dosing regimen to the three-bag technique were utilized for our random effect model meta-analysis. We found no significant heterogeneity amongst the six studies for either hepatotoxicity (Q(5) = 1.11; P = 0.95; I2 = 0%; 95% CI: 0%-74.6%) or non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and adverse events (Q(5) = 10.15; P = 0.07; I2 = 50.7%; 95% CI: 0%-80.4%). Compared to the traditional three-bag dosing regimen, the two-bag method did not demonstrate a difference in relative risk for hepatotoxicity (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72-1.08; P = 0.23) but did demonstrate a significantly decreased likelihood of non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions and other adverse events (OR: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.17-0.35; P <0.0001).

Discussion: The two-bag method is a safe and effective treatment for acute paracetamol poisoning. The two-bag regimen is correlated with a significant reduction in non-allergic anaphylactoid reactions, compared to the three-bag method, and is non-inferior with respect to hepatotoxicity. While we feel this information is practice changing for many, further research in the form of a randomized control trial would be beneficial to compare even more abbreviated methods such as a "single bag method."

Conclusion: Two-bag acetylcysteine dosing regimens appear to be non-inferior to the three-bag method with respect to hepatotoxicity, and result in fewer anaphylactoid, cutaneous, and gastrointestinal reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信