迷走神经刺激治疗耐药癫痫对医疗保健服务和药物治疗的使用模式和成本的影响:来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医疗保健索赔分析的结果。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kathryn Evans MS, MPH , Qian Li PhD , Yuliya Halchenko MA , Lu Zhang PhD , Vanessa Danielson MSc , Reginald Lassagne MSc , Bronwyn Do Rego MSc , Ariel Berger MPH
{"title":"迷走神经刺激治疗耐药癫痫对医疗保健服务和药物治疗的使用模式和成本的影响:来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医疗保健索赔分析的结果。","authors":"Kathryn Evans MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Qian Li PhD ,&nbsp;Yuliya Halchenko MA ,&nbsp;Lu Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Vanessa Danielson MSc ,&nbsp;Reginald Lassagne MSc ,&nbsp;Bronwyn Do Rego MSc ,&nbsp;Ariel Berger MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To examine the expected impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and prescription pharmacotherapies among Medicare enrollees with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) versus continued use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) alone.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study that used healthcare claims data from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. All Medicare enrollees who underwent VNS implantation between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020 were selected. Individuals without at least 24 months of continuous enrollment before implantation (index date) and at least 1 month of enrollment immediately thereafter were excluded. Patients without a diagnosis of epilepsy on the index date, and those without ASM claims during the 1-year period before that date, were also excluded. Observed patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and pharmacotherapies during the 2-year period prior to VNS were used to develop regression models to predict these outcomes during the 2-year period following the index date. Predicted monthly outcomes from these models during each month of the 24-month follow-up period were compared with corresponding outcomes observed in the database, with differences (observed minus expected) attributed to VNS implantation.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 16,223 Medicare enrollees had a procedure code for VNS between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, of whom 19.4% (<em>n</em> = 3155) met all other selection criteria. Expected composite rates of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits were higher than observed for all-cause (38.95 events per 100 person-months [PMs] vs 23.15 per 100 PMs) and epilepsy-related (33.46 per 100 PMs vs 15.97 per 100 PMs) events (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for both comparisons). Following the index month, mean monthly observed all-cause costs were $1286 lower than expected; epilepsy-related costs were $1351 lower. Differences between predicted and observed all-cause costs (including costs related to implantation) did not differ significantly by month 20, indicating an expectation that VNS “breaks even” within 2 years of implantation.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>VNS implantation was associated with 41% and 52% reductions in all-cause and epilepsy-related hospitalizations and ED visits, respectively (both vs expected), for Medicare patients with DRE, and its implantation may be cost-neutral within 2 years of the procedure. These results are similar in direction and magnitude to those observed in a previous study of commercially insured patients with DRE. Additional research is needed to better understand the impacts of neuromodulator implantation on other important outcomes, such as health-related quality of life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":"47 5","pages":"Pages 355-362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Epilepsy on Patterns of Use and Cost of Healthcare Services and Pharmacotherapy Among Medicare Enrollees: Findings From Analyses of Healthcare Claims From the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Evans MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Qian Li PhD ,&nbsp;Yuliya Halchenko MA ,&nbsp;Lu Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Vanessa Danielson MSc ,&nbsp;Reginald Lassagne MSc ,&nbsp;Bronwyn Do Rego MSc ,&nbsp;Ariel Berger MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.01.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To examine the expected impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and prescription pharmacotherapies among Medicare enrollees with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) versus continued use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) alone.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study that used healthcare claims data from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. All Medicare enrollees who underwent VNS implantation between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020 were selected. Individuals without at least 24 months of continuous enrollment before implantation (index date) and at least 1 month of enrollment immediately thereafter were excluded. Patients without a diagnosis of epilepsy on the index date, and those without ASM claims during the 1-year period before that date, were also excluded. Observed patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and pharmacotherapies during the 2-year period prior to VNS were used to develop regression models to predict these outcomes during the 2-year period following the index date. Predicted monthly outcomes from these models during each month of the 24-month follow-up period were compared with corresponding outcomes observed in the database, with differences (observed minus expected) attributed to VNS implantation.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 16,223 Medicare enrollees had a procedure code for VNS between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, of whom 19.4% (<em>n</em> = 3155) met all other selection criteria. Expected composite rates of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits were higher than observed for all-cause (38.95 events per 100 person-months [PMs] vs 23.15 per 100 PMs) and epilepsy-related (33.46 per 100 PMs vs 15.97 per 100 PMs) events (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for both comparisons). Following the index month, mean monthly observed all-cause costs were $1286 lower than expected; epilepsy-related costs were $1351 lower. Differences between predicted and observed all-cause costs (including costs related to implantation) did not differ significantly by month 20, indicating an expectation that VNS “breaks even” within 2 years of implantation.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>VNS implantation was associated with 41% and 52% reductions in all-cause and epilepsy-related hospitalizations and ED visits, respectively (both vs expected), for Medicare patients with DRE, and its implantation may be cost-neutral within 2 years of the procedure. These results are similar in direction and magnitude to those observed in a previous study of commercially insured patients with DRE. Additional research is needed to better understand the impacts of neuromodulator implantation on other important outcomes, such as health-related quality of life.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"47 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 355-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291825000293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291825000293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究迷走神经刺激(VNS)与继续单独使用抗癫痫药物(ASMs)相比,对医疗保险(Medicare)耐药癫痫(DRE)患者的医疗保健服务和处方药物治疗的使用模式和成本的预期影响。方法:这是一项回顾性、观察性、队列研究,使用来自美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医疗保健索赔数据。所有在2011年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间接受VNS植入的医疗保险参保人都被选中。排除植入前(索引日期)未连续入组至少24个月及植入后立即入组至少1个月的个体。在索引日期没有癫痫诊断的患者,以及在该日期之前1年内没有ASM索赔的患者也被排除在外。在VNS之前的2年期间,观察到的医疗保健服务和药物治疗的利用和成本模式被用于建立回归模型,以预测指数日期后2年期间的这些结果。在24个月的随访期间,将这些模型预测的每月结果与数据库中观察到的相应结果进行比较,差异(观察到的减去预期的)归因于VNS植入。研究结果:在2011年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间,共有16223名医疗保险参保人有VNS程序代码,其中19.4% (n = 3155)符合所有其他选择标准。住院和急诊科(ED)就诊的预期综合率高于全因事件(38.95 / 100人月[pm] vs 23.15 / 100 pm)和癫痫相关事件(33.46 / 100 pm vs 15.97 / 100 pm)(两种比较的P < 0.001)。在指数月之后,平均每月观察到的全因成本比预期低1286美元;与癫痫相关的费用降低了1351美元。到第20个月,预测和观察到的全因成本(包括与植入相关的成本)之间的差异没有显著差异,这表明预期VNS在植入2年内“收支平衡”。意义:VNS植入与DRE医保患者全因和癫痫相关住院和ED就诊分别减少41%和52%相关(均与预期相比),并且其植入在手术后2年内可能是成本中性的。这些结果在方向和量级上与先前对商业保险患者DRE的研究中观察到的结果相似。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解神经调节剂植入对其他重要结果的影响,例如与健康相关的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Epilepsy on Patterns of Use and Cost of Healthcare Services and Pharmacotherapy Among Medicare Enrollees: Findings From Analyses of Healthcare Claims From the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services

Purpose

To examine the expected impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and prescription pharmacotherapies among Medicare enrollees with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) versus continued use of antiseizure medications (ASMs) alone.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational, cohort study that used healthcare claims data from the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. All Medicare enrollees who underwent VNS implantation between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2020 were selected. Individuals without at least 24 months of continuous enrollment before implantation (index date) and at least 1 month of enrollment immediately thereafter were excluded. Patients without a diagnosis of epilepsy on the index date, and those without ASM claims during the 1-year period before that date, were also excluded. Observed patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare services and pharmacotherapies during the 2-year period prior to VNS were used to develop regression models to predict these outcomes during the 2-year period following the index date. Predicted monthly outcomes from these models during each month of the 24-month follow-up period were compared with corresponding outcomes observed in the database, with differences (observed minus expected) attributed to VNS implantation.

Findings

A total of 16,223 Medicare enrollees had a procedure code for VNS between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, of whom 19.4% (n = 3155) met all other selection criteria. Expected composite rates of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits were higher than observed for all-cause (38.95 events per 100 person-months [PMs] vs 23.15 per 100 PMs) and epilepsy-related (33.46 per 100 PMs vs 15.97 per 100 PMs) events (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Following the index month, mean monthly observed all-cause costs were $1286 lower than expected; epilepsy-related costs were $1351 lower. Differences between predicted and observed all-cause costs (including costs related to implantation) did not differ significantly by month 20, indicating an expectation that VNS “breaks even” within 2 years of implantation.

Implications

VNS implantation was associated with 41% and 52% reductions in all-cause and epilepsy-related hospitalizations and ED visits, respectively (both vs expected), for Medicare patients with DRE, and its implantation may be cost-neutral within 2 years of the procedure. These results are similar in direction and magnitude to those observed in a previous study of commercially insured patients with DRE. Additional research is needed to better understand the impacts of neuromodulator implantation on other important outcomes, such as health-related quality of life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信