非心脏手术术中低血压和术后风险:一项荟萃分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Guanchao Qin, Ming-Cheng Du, Ke-Xin Yi, Yuan Gong
{"title":"非心脏手术术中低血压和术后风险:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Guanchao Qin, Ming-Cheng Du, Ke-Xin Yi, Yuan Gong","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-02976-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative complications are often associated with the severity and duration of intraoperative hypotension. However, the optimal approach for managing intraoperative hypotension remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to compare the incidence of common postoperative complications with different treatment threshold of hypotension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and Embase from August 2014 to August 2024 for studies comparing different treatment threshold of hypotension (low [mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg], moderate [60-75 mmHg], and high [> 75 mmHg]). Only randomized controlled trials conducted during 2014-2024 were included in this meta-analysis without language restrictions. Studies with the following characteristics were included: randomized controlled study; involved non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgery; included different blood pressure management strategies; evaluated major postoperative complications; and included acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, altered consciousness, or infection. Data included patient age, type of surgery, group criteria, and adverse events. Mantel-Haenszel method was used for analysis. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including acute kidney injury. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2160 studies identified, eight randomized controlled trials with 9108 participants were included. No significant differences in postoperative complications were observed between the moderate and high mean arterial pressure treatment threshold groups (risk ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval = 0.86-1.18, P = 0.96). Sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings. Length of hospitalization was not significantly different between the groups (standardized mean difference = -0.39; 95% confidence interval = -0.69 to 1.31; P = 0.03). Limited data prevented meta-analysis of mean arterial pressure management at lower treatment thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this meta-analysis suggest no significant differences in postoperative complications between moderate and high mean arterial pressure management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative risks in non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Guanchao Qin, Ming-Cheng Du, Ke-Xin Yi, Yuan Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-02976-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative complications are often associated with the severity and duration of intraoperative hypotension. However, the optimal approach for managing intraoperative hypotension remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to compare the incidence of common postoperative complications with different treatment threshold of hypotension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and Embase from August 2014 to August 2024 for studies comparing different treatment threshold of hypotension (low [mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg], moderate [60-75 mmHg], and high [> 75 mmHg]). Only randomized controlled trials conducted during 2014-2024 were included in this meta-analysis without language restrictions. Studies with the following characteristics were included: randomized controlled study; involved non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgery; included different blood pressure management strategies; evaluated major postoperative complications; and included acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, altered consciousness, or infection. Data included patient age, type of surgery, group criteria, and adverse events. Mantel-Haenszel method was used for analysis. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including acute kidney injury. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2160 studies identified, eight randomized controlled trials with 9108 participants were included. No significant differences in postoperative complications were observed between the moderate and high mean arterial pressure treatment threshold groups (risk ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval = 0.86-1.18, P = 0.96). Sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings. Length of hospitalization was not significantly different between the groups (standardized mean difference = -0.39; 95% confidence interval = -0.69 to 1.31; P = 0.03). Limited data prevented meta-analysis of mean arterial pressure management at lower treatment thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this meta-analysis suggest no significant differences in postoperative complications between moderate and high mean arterial pressure management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863555/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02976-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-02976-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后并发症通常与术中低血压的严重程度和持续时间有关。然而,治疗术中低血压的最佳方法仍然存在争议。这项随机对照试验荟萃分析的目的是比较不同低血压治疗阈值的常见术后并发症的发生率。方法:从2014年8月至2024年8月,我们检索PubMed、Cochrane数据库和Embase,比较不同低血压治疗阈值(低[平均动脉压75mmhg])的研究。本荟萃分析仅纳入2014-2024年期间进行的随机对照试验,无语言限制。纳入具有以下特征的研究:随机对照研究;涉及非心脏、非产科手术;包括不同的血压管理策略;评估术后主要并发症;包括急性肾损伤、心肌损伤、意识改变或感染。数据包括患者年龄、手术类型、分组标准和不良事件。采用Mantel-Haenszel法进行分析。主要结局是术后并发症,包括急性肾损伤。次要结局包括住院时间和全因死亡率。结果:在确定的2160项研究中,包括8项随机对照试验,9108名参与者。中高平均动脉压治疗阈值组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(风险比= 1.0,95%可信区间= 0.86 ~ 1.18,P = 0.96)。敏感性分析证实了这些发现。两组间住院时间差异无统计学意义(标准化平均差= -0.39;95%置信区间= -0.69 ~ 1.31;p = 0.03)。数据有限,无法对较低治疗阈值下的平均动脉压管理进行meta分析。结论:本荟萃分析的结果表明,中等和高平均动脉压治疗在术后并发症方面无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative risks in non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.

Background: Postoperative complications are often associated with the severity and duration of intraoperative hypotension. However, the optimal approach for managing intraoperative hypotension remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was to compare the incidence of common postoperative complications with different treatment threshold of hypotension.

Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and Embase from August 2014 to August 2024 for studies comparing different treatment threshold of hypotension (low [mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg], moderate [60-75 mmHg], and high [> 75 mmHg]). Only randomized controlled trials conducted during 2014-2024 were included in this meta-analysis without language restrictions. Studies with the following characteristics were included: randomized controlled study; involved non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgery; included different blood pressure management strategies; evaluated major postoperative complications; and included acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, altered consciousness, or infection. Data included patient age, type of surgery, group criteria, and adverse events. Mantel-Haenszel method was used for analysis. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications, including acute kidney injury. The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality.

Results: Of the 2160 studies identified, eight randomized controlled trials with 9108 participants were included. No significant differences in postoperative complications were observed between the moderate and high mean arterial pressure treatment threshold groups (risk ratio = 1.0, 95% confidence interval = 0.86-1.18, P = 0.96). Sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings. Length of hospitalization was not significantly different between the groups (standardized mean difference = -0.39; 95% confidence interval = -0.69 to 1.31; P = 0.03). Limited data prevented meta-analysis of mean arterial pressure management at lower treatment thresholds.

Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis suggest no significant differences in postoperative complications between moderate and high mean arterial pressure management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信