肠道微生物组调节干预对婴儿粪便代谢组的影响:系统评价和质量评估。

IF 3.4 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Proteomics Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1002/pmic.202400150
Gaute Hovde Bø, Rolf Simon Härmä, Claus Klingenberg, Veronika Kuchařová Pettersen
{"title":"肠道微生物组调节干预对婴儿粪便代谢组的影响:系统评价和质量评估。","authors":"Gaute Hovde Bø, Rolf Simon Härmä, Claus Klingenberg, Veronika Kuchařová Pettersen","doi":"10.1002/pmic.202400150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of the gut microbiome in infancy is a vulnerable process that may be perturbed by antibiotics or supported by probiotics. Although effects of these \"biotics\" have been well-studied through DNA sequencing, it remains unclear how the resulting compositional changes affect the microbiome metabolic functions. Additionally, limits in method standardization require careful quality assessment of studies reporting fecal metabolome. We conducted a systematic search in Embase and MEDLINE for studies describing fecal metabolites from term and near-term infants, together with anti-, pre-, or probiotic intervention. The search identified 680 articles, of which 60 were assessed for eligibility and 21 were included. We first developed operational checklists for transparent and reproducible reporting and evaluated the quality of metabolomic methodologies. This analysis supported our aim to summarize changes in the fecal metabolome induced by biotic interventions. Despite a varying quality of metabolomic methodology, we identified similarities in the fecal metabolome profiles in response to specific biotic interventions. Among the most frequently observed metabolites, which were consistently reported to be altered after biotic interventions, were bile acids, aromatic amino acids, and short-chain fatty acids. We conclude with a discussion on appropriate experimental design, controls, and metabolomics reporting to guide future research permitting meta-analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":224,"journal":{"name":"Proteomics","volume":" ","pages":"e202400150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Gut Microbiome Modulating Interventions on Fecal Metabolome of Infants: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Gaute Hovde Bø, Rolf Simon Härmä, Claus Klingenberg, Veronika Kuchařová Pettersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmic.202400150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The development of the gut microbiome in infancy is a vulnerable process that may be perturbed by antibiotics or supported by probiotics. Although effects of these \\\"biotics\\\" have been well-studied through DNA sequencing, it remains unclear how the resulting compositional changes affect the microbiome metabolic functions. Additionally, limits in method standardization require careful quality assessment of studies reporting fecal metabolome. We conducted a systematic search in Embase and MEDLINE for studies describing fecal metabolites from term and near-term infants, together with anti-, pre-, or probiotic intervention. The search identified 680 articles, of which 60 were assessed for eligibility and 21 were included. We first developed operational checklists for transparent and reproducible reporting and evaluated the quality of metabolomic methodologies. This analysis supported our aim to summarize changes in the fecal metabolome induced by biotic interventions. Despite a varying quality of metabolomic methodology, we identified similarities in the fecal metabolome profiles in response to specific biotic interventions. Among the most frequently observed metabolites, which were consistently reported to be altered after biotic interventions, were bile acids, aromatic amino acids, and short-chain fatty acids. We conclude with a discussion on appropriate experimental design, controls, and metabolomics reporting to guide future research permitting meta-analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proteomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e202400150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202400150\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.202400150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

婴儿期肠道微生物群的发育是一个脆弱的过程,可能受到抗生素的干扰,也可能受到益生菌的支持。尽管这些“生物制剂”的影响已经通过DNA测序得到了很好的研究,但目前尚不清楚由此产生的成分变化如何影响微生物组的代谢功能。此外,方法标准化的限制要求对报告粪便代谢组的研究进行仔细的质量评估。我们在Embase和MEDLINE中进行了系统的检索,研究描述了足月和近期婴儿的粪便代谢物,以及抗、预或益生菌干预。检索确定了680篇文章,其中60篇被评估为合格,21篇被纳入。我们首先为透明和可重复的报告制定了操作清单,并评估了代谢组学方法的质量。这一分析支持了我们总结生物干预引起的粪便代谢组变化的目的。尽管代谢组学方法的质量参差不齐,但我们确定了响应特定生物干预的粪便代谢组谱的相似性。最常观察到的代谢产物是胆汁酸、芳香氨基酸和短链脂肪酸,这些代谢产物在生物干预后一直被报道发生了改变。最后,我们讨论了适当的实验设计、对照和代谢组学报告,以指导未来的研究,允许荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Gut Microbiome Modulating Interventions on Fecal Metabolome of Infants: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.

The development of the gut microbiome in infancy is a vulnerable process that may be perturbed by antibiotics or supported by probiotics. Although effects of these "biotics" have been well-studied through DNA sequencing, it remains unclear how the resulting compositional changes affect the microbiome metabolic functions. Additionally, limits in method standardization require careful quality assessment of studies reporting fecal metabolome. We conducted a systematic search in Embase and MEDLINE for studies describing fecal metabolites from term and near-term infants, together with anti-, pre-, or probiotic intervention. The search identified 680 articles, of which 60 were assessed for eligibility and 21 were included. We first developed operational checklists for transparent and reproducible reporting and evaluated the quality of metabolomic methodologies. This analysis supported our aim to summarize changes in the fecal metabolome induced by biotic interventions. Despite a varying quality of metabolomic methodology, we identified similarities in the fecal metabolome profiles in response to specific biotic interventions. Among the most frequently observed metabolites, which were consistently reported to be altered after biotic interventions, were bile acids, aromatic amino acids, and short-chain fatty acids. We conclude with a discussion on appropriate experimental design, controls, and metabolomics reporting to guide future research permitting meta-analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proteomics
Proteomics 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: PROTEOMICS is the premier international source for information on all aspects of applications and technologies, including software, in proteomics and other "omics". The journal includes but is not limited to proteomics, genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and lipidomics, and systems biology approaches. Papers describing novel applications of proteomics and integration of multi-omics data and approaches are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信