柯南:测量和评估不确定性下视觉数据分析中的用户信心

IF 2.7 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
M. Musleh, D. Ceneda, H. Ehlers, R. G. Raidou
{"title":"柯南:测量和评估不确定性下视觉数据分析中的用户信心","authors":"M. Musleh,&nbsp;D. Ceneda,&nbsp;H. Ehlers,&nbsp;R. G. Raidou","doi":"10.1111/cgf.15272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>User confidence plays an important role in guided visual data analysis scenarios, especially when uncertainty is involved in the analytical process. However, measuring confidence in practical scenarios remains an open challenge, as previous work relies primarily on self-reporting methods. In this work, we propose a quantitative approach to measure user confidence—as opposed to trust—in an analytical scenario. We do so by exploiting the respective user interaction provenance graph and examining the impact of guidance using a set of network metrics. We assess the usefulness of our proposed metrics through a user study that correlates results obtained from self-reported confidence assessments and our metrics—both with and without guidance. The results suggest that our metrics improve the evaluation of user confidence compared to available approaches. In particular, we found a correlation between self-reported confidence and some of the proposed provenance network metrics. The quantitative results, though, do not show a statistically significant impact of the guidance on user confidence. An additional descriptive analysis suggests that guidance could impact users' confidence and that the qualitative analysis of the provenance network topology can provide a comprehensive view of changes in user confidence. Our results indicate that our proposed metrics and the provenance network graph representation support the evaluation of user confidence and, subsequently, the effective development of guidance in VA.</p>","PeriodicalId":10687,"journal":{"name":"Computer Graphics Forum","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cgf.15272","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ConAn: Measuring and Evaluating User Confidence in Visual Data Analysis Under Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"M. Musleh,&nbsp;D. Ceneda,&nbsp;H. Ehlers,&nbsp;R. G. Raidou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cgf.15272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>User confidence plays an important role in guided visual data analysis scenarios, especially when uncertainty is involved in the analytical process. However, measuring confidence in practical scenarios remains an open challenge, as previous work relies primarily on self-reporting methods. In this work, we propose a quantitative approach to measure user confidence—as opposed to trust—in an analytical scenario. We do so by exploiting the respective user interaction provenance graph and examining the impact of guidance using a set of network metrics. We assess the usefulness of our proposed metrics through a user study that correlates results obtained from self-reported confidence assessments and our metrics—both with and without guidance. The results suggest that our metrics improve the evaluation of user confidence compared to available approaches. In particular, we found a correlation between self-reported confidence and some of the proposed provenance network metrics. The quantitative results, though, do not show a statistically significant impact of the guidance on user confidence. An additional descriptive analysis suggests that guidance could impact users' confidence and that the qualitative analysis of the provenance network topology can provide a comprehensive view of changes in user confidence. Our results indicate that our proposed metrics and the provenance network graph representation support the evaluation of user confidence and, subsequently, the effective development of guidance in VA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Graphics Forum\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cgf.15272\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Graphics Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.15272\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Graphics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cgf.15272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用户信心在引导可视化数据分析场景中起着重要作用,特别是当分析过程中涉及不确定性时。然而,在实际情况下测量信心仍然是一个开放的挑战,因为以前的工作主要依赖于自我报告方法。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种在分析场景中测量用户信心(而不是信任)的定量方法。我们通过利用各自的用户交互来源图和使用一组网络指标检查指导的影响来做到这一点。我们通过一项用户研究来评估我们提出的指标的有效性,该研究将从自我报告的信心评估和我们的指标中获得的结果(有和没有指导)联系起来。结果表明,与现有方法相比,我们的度量标准提高了对用户信心的评估。特别是,我们发现自我报告的信心和一些提议的来源网络指标之间存在相关性。然而,定量结果并没有显示指导对用户信心的统计显著影响。另一项描述性分析表明,指导可能会影响用户的信心,而对来源网络拓扑的定性分析可以提供用户信心变化的全面视图。我们的研究结果表明,我们提出的度量和来源网络图表示支持用户置信度的评估,并随后支持VA中指导的有效开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

ConAn: Measuring and Evaluating User Confidence in Visual Data Analysis Under Uncertainty

ConAn: Measuring and Evaluating User Confidence in Visual Data Analysis Under Uncertainty

User confidence plays an important role in guided visual data analysis scenarios, especially when uncertainty is involved in the analytical process. However, measuring confidence in practical scenarios remains an open challenge, as previous work relies primarily on self-reporting methods. In this work, we propose a quantitative approach to measure user confidence—as opposed to trust—in an analytical scenario. We do so by exploiting the respective user interaction provenance graph and examining the impact of guidance using a set of network metrics. We assess the usefulness of our proposed metrics through a user study that correlates results obtained from self-reported confidence assessments and our metrics—both with and without guidance. The results suggest that our metrics improve the evaluation of user confidence compared to available approaches. In particular, we found a correlation between self-reported confidence and some of the proposed provenance network metrics. The quantitative results, though, do not show a statistically significant impact of the guidance on user confidence. An additional descriptive analysis suggests that guidance could impact users' confidence and that the qualitative analysis of the provenance network topology can provide a comprehensive view of changes in user confidence. Our results indicate that our proposed metrics and the provenance network graph representation support the evaluation of user confidence and, subsequently, the effective development of guidance in VA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Graphics Forum
Computer Graphics Forum 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Graphics Forum is the official journal of Eurographics, published in cooperation with Wiley-Blackwell, and is a unique, international source of information for computer graphics professionals interested in graphics developments worldwide. It is now one of the leading journals for researchers, developers and users of computer graphics in both commercial and academic environments. The journal reports on the latest developments in the field throughout the world and covers all aspects of the theory, practice and application of computer graphics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信