临床应用纳曲酮/安非他酮定剂量缓释的心血管安全性

Michael Kyle , Dustin Burns , Catherine Rogers Murray , Heather Watson , Jeff Swaney , Samuel Spevack , Megan Leonhard , Michael Simon , Emma Moynihan , Kate L. Lapane , Shirley V. Wang , Craig L. Longo , Mary E. Ritchey , David D. Dore
{"title":"临床应用纳曲酮/安非他酮定剂量缓释的心血管安全性","authors":"Michael Kyle ,&nbsp;Dustin Burns ,&nbsp;Catherine Rogers Murray ,&nbsp;Heather Watson ,&nbsp;Jeff Swaney ,&nbsp;Samuel Spevack ,&nbsp;Megan Leonhard ,&nbsp;Michael Simon ,&nbsp;Emma Moynihan ,&nbsp;Kate L. Lapane ,&nbsp;Shirley V. Wang ,&nbsp;Craig L. Longo ,&nbsp;Mary E. Ritchey ,&nbsp;David D. Dore","doi":"10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The fixed-dose extended-release combination of naltrexone/bupropion (NB-ER) is indicated to treat overweight and obesity in adults as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. This study compared the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its components (nonfatal acute myocardial infarction [AMI], nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death) between patients initiating NB-ER and those initiating lorcaserin (removed from US market in 2020; included as active comparator to minimize possible confounding by indication) in routine clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study with a new-user, active-comparator design. Patients initiating NB-ER or lorcaserin were identified using Arcadia Data Research electronic health records, including insurance claims (June 2012–February 2020). Incidence rate ratios were estimated, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a propensity score (PS)-weighted Cox proportional hazard model in an intention-to-treat analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients initiating NB-ER (n = 12 475) or lorcaserin (n = 12 171) were followed for a mean observation period of 4.7 years. After PS weighting, baseline comorbidities, concomitant medications, lifestyle factors, and clinical measures were balanced between cohorts. MACE incidence was 0.77/1000 person-years for NB-ER and 1.03/1000 person-years for lorcaserin. Compared to lorcaserin, patients initiating NB-ER had statistically similar rates of MACE (aHR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.48–1.22), nonfatal AMI (aHR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.45–1.23), and nonfatal stroke (aHR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.34–3.22). No deaths were observed within 30 days of an AMI or stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients initiating NB-ER compared with lorcaserin were not at an increased risk of MACE or its components. Conclusions from this study must be interpreted in the context of certain assumptions related to PS methodology and use of lorcaserin as an active comparator. Causal interpretations for the cardiovascular safety of NB-ER should be evaluated further in a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100977,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Pillars","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular safety of fixed-dose extended-release naltrexone/bupropion in clinical practice\",\"authors\":\"Michael Kyle ,&nbsp;Dustin Burns ,&nbsp;Catherine Rogers Murray ,&nbsp;Heather Watson ,&nbsp;Jeff Swaney ,&nbsp;Samuel Spevack ,&nbsp;Megan Leonhard ,&nbsp;Michael Simon ,&nbsp;Emma Moynihan ,&nbsp;Kate L. Lapane ,&nbsp;Shirley V. Wang ,&nbsp;Craig L. Longo ,&nbsp;Mary E. Ritchey ,&nbsp;David D. Dore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.obpill.2025.100169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The fixed-dose extended-release combination of naltrexone/bupropion (NB-ER) is indicated to treat overweight and obesity in adults as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. This study compared the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its components (nonfatal acute myocardial infarction [AMI], nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death) between patients initiating NB-ER and those initiating lorcaserin (removed from US market in 2020; included as active comparator to minimize possible confounding by indication) in routine clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study with a new-user, active-comparator design. Patients initiating NB-ER or lorcaserin were identified using Arcadia Data Research electronic health records, including insurance claims (June 2012–February 2020). Incidence rate ratios were estimated, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a propensity score (PS)-weighted Cox proportional hazard model in an intention-to-treat analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients initiating NB-ER (n = 12 475) or lorcaserin (n = 12 171) were followed for a mean observation period of 4.7 years. After PS weighting, baseline comorbidities, concomitant medications, lifestyle factors, and clinical measures were balanced between cohorts. MACE incidence was 0.77/1000 person-years for NB-ER and 1.03/1000 person-years for lorcaserin. Compared to lorcaserin, patients initiating NB-ER had statistically similar rates of MACE (aHR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.48–1.22), nonfatal AMI (aHR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.45–1.23), and nonfatal stroke (aHR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.34–3.22). No deaths were observed within 30 days of an AMI or stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients initiating NB-ER compared with lorcaserin were not at an increased risk of MACE or its components. Conclusions from this study must be interpreted in the context of certain assumptions related to PS methodology and use of lorcaserin as an active comparator. Causal interpretations for the cardiovascular safety of NB-ER should be evaluated further in a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Pillars\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Pillars\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368125000130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Pillars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667368125000130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纳曲酮/安非他酮(NB-ER)的固定剂量缓释组合被认为可以作为减少卡路里饮食和增加身体活动的辅助手段来治疗成人超重和肥胖。该研究比较了服用NB-ER和服用氯卡色林(将于2020年从美国市场撤出;作为主动比较者纳入常规临床实践,以尽量减少可能的混淆(指征)。方法采用回顾性队列研究,采用新用户、主动比较设计。使用阿卡迪亚数据研究公司的电子健康记录,包括保险索赔(2012年6月至2020年2月)确定服用NB-ER或氯卡塞林的患者。在意向治疗分析中,使用倾向评分(PS)加权Cox比例风险模型估计发病率比,并估计95%置信区间(CIs)的校正风险比(aHRs)。结果接受NB-ER治疗(n = 12 475)或氯卡色林治疗(n = 12 171)的患者平均随访4.7年。PS加权后,基线合并症、伴随用药、生活方式因素和临床措施在队列之间进行平衡。NB-ER的MACE发生率为0.77/1000人年,氯卡色林的MACE发生率为1.03/1000人年。与氯卡色林相比,启动NB-ER的患者MACE发生率具有统计学意义相似(aHR, 0.76;95% CI, 0.48-1.22),非致死性AMI (aHR, 0.74;95% CI, 0.45-1.23)和非致死性卒中(aHR, 1.05;95% ci, 0.34-3.22)。AMI或中风后30天内未观察到死亡。结论与氯卡色林相比,开始使用NB-ER的患者发生MACE或其成分的风险没有增加。本研究的结论必须在与PS方法和使用氯卡色林作为活性比较剂有关的某些假设的背景下进行解释。NB-ER心血管安全性的因果解释应在前瞻性、随机、盲法、对照临床试验中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Cardiovascular safety of fixed-dose extended-release naltrexone/bupropion in clinical practice

Cardiovascular safety of fixed-dose extended-release naltrexone/bupropion in clinical practice

Background

The fixed-dose extended-release combination of naltrexone/bupropion (NB-ER) is indicated to treat overweight and obesity in adults as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. This study compared the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its components (nonfatal acute myocardial infarction [AMI], nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death) between patients initiating NB-ER and those initiating lorcaserin (removed from US market in 2020; included as active comparator to minimize possible confounding by indication) in routine clinical practice.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study with a new-user, active-comparator design. Patients initiating NB-ER or lorcaserin were identified using Arcadia Data Research electronic health records, including insurance claims (June 2012–February 2020). Incidence rate ratios were estimated, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a propensity score (PS)-weighted Cox proportional hazard model in an intention-to-treat analysis.

Results

Patients initiating NB-ER (n = 12 475) or lorcaserin (n = 12 171) were followed for a mean observation period of 4.7 years. After PS weighting, baseline comorbidities, concomitant medications, lifestyle factors, and clinical measures were balanced between cohorts. MACE incidence was 0.77/1000 person-years for NB-ER and 1.03/1000 person-years for lorcaserin. Compared to lorcaserin, patients initiating NB-ER had statistically similar rates of MACE (aHR, 0.76; 95 % CI, 0.48–1.22), nonfatal AMI (aHR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.45–1.23), and nonfatal stroke (aHR, 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.34–3.22). No deaths were observed within 30 days of an AMI or stroke.

Conclusion

Patients initiating NB-ER compared with lorcaserin were not at an increased risk of MACE or its components. Conclusions from this study must be interpreted in the context of certain assumptions related to PS methodology and use of lorcaserin as an active comparator. Causal interpretations for the cardiovascular safety of NB-ER should be evaluated further in a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信