未来制造的治理:纳米比亚和南非的绿色氢

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Britta Klagge , Benedikt Walker , Linus Kalvelage , Clemens Greiner
{"title":"未来制造的治理:纳米比亚和南非的绿色氢","authors":"Britta Klagge ,&nbsp;Benedikt Walker ,&nbsp;Linus Kalvelage ,&nbsp;Clemens Greiner","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The green-hydrogen sector has created considerable expectations in the Global South about export-oriented development and industrial path creation. However, whether and how these expectations are really materializing requires further scrutiny. This article develops a conceptual approach that we call governance of future-making. Thereby, we want to understand how actors try to coordinate their expectations about future economic development in different contexts and across scales over time. We conceptualize the emergence of new regional development trajectories as resulting from the use of governance instruments with an increasing bindingness, which reflect the interplay between governance of and by expectations. Based on this approach, we analyze and compare green-hydrogen activities in Namibia and South Africa. We find that future-making is becoming more binding in both countries but has not resulted in path creation yet.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governance of future-making: Green hydrogen in Namibia and South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Britta Klagge ,&nbsp;Benedikt Walker ,&nbsp;Linus Kalvelage ,&nbsp;Clemens Greiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The green-hydrogen sector has created considerable expectations in the Global South about export-oriented development and industrial path creation. However, whether and how these expectations are really materializing requires further scrutiny. This article develops a conceptual approach that we call governance of future-making. Thereby, we want to understand how actors try to coordinate their expectations about future economic development in different contexts and across scales over time. We conceptualize the emergence of new regional development trajectories as resulting from the use of governance instruments with an increasing bindingness, which reflect the interplay between governance of and by expectations. Based on this approach, we analyze and compare green-hydrogen activities in Namibia and South Africa. We find that future-making is becoming more binding in both countries but has not resulted in path creation yet.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000442\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525000442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绿色氢能行业在全球南方国家引发了对出口导向型发展和产业路径创造的巨大期望。然而,这些期望是否以及如何真正实现需要进一步的审查。本文开发了一种概念性方法,我们称之为未来制定的治理。因此,我们希望了解参与者如何在不同背景下、跨尺度地协调他们对未来经济发展的预期。我们将新的区域发展轨迹的出现概念化为使用约束性越来越强的治理工具的结果,这反映了期望治理和期望治理之间的相互作用。基于这种方法,我们分析和比较了纳米比亚和南非的绿色氢活动。我们发现,在这两个国家,未来创造越来越具有约束力,但尚未导致路径创造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governance of future-making: Green hydrogen in Namibia and South Africa
The green-hydrogen sector has created considerable expectations in the Global South about export-oriented development and industrial path creation. However, whether and how these expectations are really materializing requires further scrutiny. This article develops a conceptual approach that we call governance of future-making. Thereby, we want to understand how actors try to coordinate their expectations about future economic development in different contexts and across scales over time. We conceptualize the emergence of new regional development trajectories as resulting from the use of governance instruments with an increasing bindingness, which reflect the interplay between governance of and by expectations. Based on this approach, we analyze and compare green-hydrogen activities in Namibia and South Africa. We find that future-making is becoming more binding in both countries but has not resulted in path creation yet.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信