评估个人层面的微流动性净收益:两个欧洲国家的证据

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Nelson Daniel, Frederico Cruz-Jesus, Carlos Tam
{"title":"评估个人层面的微流动性净收益:两个欧洲国家的证据","authors":"Nelson Daniel,&nbsp;Frederico Cruz-Jesus,&nbsp;Carlos Tam","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study, comparing two European countries, explores the net benefits of e-scooters in interplay with their usage and user satisfaction. We surveyed 199 e-scooter users in Germany and 184 in Portugal. A novel framework based on an established model used to evaluate information systems’ success is introduced, where net benefits, here, are ultimately expressed by the efficiency and effectiveness of e-scooters in undertaking short-distance trips. All in all, one can infer that pragmatic reasons, in terms of functionality and fulfillment of purpose, are the most important factors in the usage and satisfaction of e-scooters. Recreational reasons are, at most, a side effect. The number one explanation of e-scooter net benefits, conducting short-distance trips effectively and efficiently, is user satisfaction, which is reinforced by use. Price also plays a rather important role, while thoughts regarding sustainability and safety do matter but subordinately. Preponderantly, the countries’ subsamples align with the full-sample model’s findings, with some differences among them; nonetheless, no significant one can be found. All in all, both countries share comparable individual-level behaviors regarding e-scooters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 95-111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing micro-mobility net benefits at the individual level: Evidence for two European countries\",\"authors\":\"Nelson Daniel,&nbsp;Frederico Cruz-Jesus,&nbsp;Carlos Tam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study, comparing two European countries, explores the net benefits of e-scooters in interplay with their usage and user satisfaction. We surveyed 199 e-scooter users in Germany and 184 in Portugal. A novel framework based on an established model used to evaluate information systems’ success is introduced, where net benefits, here, are ultimately expressed by the efficiency and effectiveness of e-scooters in undertaking short-distance trips. All in all, one can infer that pragmatic reasons, in terms of functionality and fulfillment of purpose, are the most important factors in the usage and satisfaction of e-scooters. Recreational reasons are, at most, a side effect. The number one explanation of e-scooter net benefits, conducting short-distance trips effectively and efficiently, is user satisfaction, which is reinforced by use. Price also plays a rather important role, while thoughts regarding sustainability and safety do matter but subordinately. Preponderantly, the countries’ subsamples align with the full-sample model’s findings, with some differences among them; nonetheless, no significant one can be found. All in all, both countries share comparable individual-level behaviors regarding e-scooters.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 95-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000671\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000671","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究比较了两个欧洲国家,探讨了电动滑板车的净收益与使用和用户满意度之间的相互作用。我们在德国调查了199名电动滑板车用户,在葡萄牙调查了184名。本文介绍了一个基于已建立模型的新框架,该模型用于评估信息系统的成功,其中净收益最终由电动滑板车在短途旅行中的效率和有效性表示。总而言之,我们可以推断出实用主义的原因,就功能和目的的实现而言,是电动滑板车使用和满意度的最重要因素。娱乐的原因最多只是副作用。电动滑板车的净收益,有效和高效地进行短途旅行的首要解释是用户满意度,这是通过使用来加强的。价格也起着相当重要的作用,而关于可持续性和安全性的想法确实很重要,但只是次要的。总的来说,这些国家的子样本与全样本模型的结果一致,但它们之间存在一些差异;尽管如此,没有发现显著的差异。总而言之,两国在电动滑板车的个人行为方面具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing micro-mobility net benefits at the individual level: Evidence for two European countries
This study, comparing two European countries, explores the net benefits of e-scooters in interplay with their usage and user satisfaction. We surveyed 199 e-scooter users in Germany and 184 in Portugal. A novel framework based on an established model used to evaluate information systems’ success is introduced, where net benefits, here, are ultimately expressed by the efficiency and effectiveness of e-scooters in undertaking short-distance trips. All in all, one can infer that pragmatic reasons, in terms of functionality and fulfillment of purpose, are the most important factors in the usage and satisfaction of e-scooters. Recreational reasons are, at most, a side effect. The number one explanation of e-scooter net benefits, conducting short-distance trips effectively and efficiently, is user satisfaction, which is reinforced by use. Price also plays a rather important role, while thoughts regarding sustainability and safety do matter but subordinately. Preponderantly, the countries’ subsamples align with the full-sample model’s findings, with some differences among them; nonetheless, no significant one can be found. All in all, both countries share comparable individual-level behaviors regarding e-scooters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信