评估数字改造解决方案的多标准决策:利用AHP和TOPSIS

Abdulrahman Alqoud , Jelena Milisavljevic-Syed , Konstantinos Salonitis
{"title":"评估数字改造解决方案的多标准决策:利用AHP和TOPSIS","authors":"Abdulrahman Alqoud ,&nbsp;Jelena Milisavljevic-Syed ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Salonitis","doi":"10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In an era of digital transformation, evaluating effective strategies for upgrading manufacturing systems is crucial to maintaining competitiveness. Digital retrofitting has become a strategic approach integrating new digital technologies into legacy systems to share data and align with Industry 4.0 principles. However, various techniques and criteria exist for implementing digital retrofitting. Despite its importance, there is a notable lack of studies assessing these retrofitting approaches using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodologies. This study addresses this gap by employing two MCDM techniques: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). It assesses three digital retrofitting alternatives, starter kit solutions, embedded gateway solutions, and IoT hardware-based solutions, against ten critical criteria. These criteria were weighted through pairwise comparison analysis based on a survey of twelve industry practitioners to reflect industry preferences. The aim is to determine the most effective digital retrofitting approach to aid manufacturers in transitioning to Industry 4.0. This study addresses the complexities of managing conflicting criteria in digital transformation. Moreover, the results contribute to decision-making methodologies by demonstrating their practical applications, thus guiding manufacturers through the intricate landscape of digital retrofitting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20535,"journal":{"name":"Procedia CIRP","volume":"132 ","pages":"Pages 184-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria decision making in evaluating digital retrofitting solutions: utilising AHP and TOPSIS\",\"authors\":\"Abdulrahman Alqoud ,&nbsp;Jelena Milisavljevic-Syed ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Salonitis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In an era of digital transformation, evaluating effective strategies for upgrading manufacturing systems is crucial to maintaining competitiveness. Digital retrofitting has become a strategic approach integrating new digital technologies into legacy systems to share data and align with Industry 4.0 principles. However, various techniques and criteria exist for implementing digital retrofitting. Despite its importance, there is a notable lack of studies assessing these retrofitting approaches using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodologies. This study addresses this gap by employing two MCDM techniques: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). It assesses three digital retrofitting alternatives, starter kit solutions, embedded gateway solutions, and IoT hardware-based solutions, against ten critical criteria. These criteria were weighted through pairwise comparison analysis based on a survey of twelve industry practitioners to reflect industry preferences. The aim is to determine the most effective digital retrofitting approach to aid manufacturers in transitioning to Industry 4.0. This study addresses the complexities of managing conflicting criteria in digital transformation. Moreover, the results contribute to decision-making methodologies by demonstrating their practical applications, thus guiding manufacturers through the intricate landscape of digital retrofitting.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedia CIRP\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 184-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedia CIRP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125000319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia CIRP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827125000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在数字化转型时代,评估制造系统升级的有效战略对于保持竞争力至关重要。数字化改造已经成为一种将新的数字技术集成到传统系统中以共享数据并与工业4.0原则保持一致的战略方法。然而,实现数字化改造存在各种技术和标准。尽管它很重要,但明显缺乏使用多标准决策(MCDM)方法评估这些改造方法的研究。本研究通过采用两种MCDM技术来解决这一差距:层次分析法(AHP)和理想解相似性偏好排序技术(TOPSIS)。它根据十个关键标准评估了三种数字改造替代方案,即入门套件解决方案,嵌入式网关解决方案和基于物联网硬件的解决方案。这些标准通过两两比较分析加权,基于对12个行业从业者的调查,以反映行业偏好。其目的是确定最有效的数字化改造方法,以帮助制造商向工业4.0过渡。本研究解决了在数字化转型中管理冲突标准的复杂性。此外,通过展示其实际应用,结果有助于决策方法,从而指导制造商通过复杂的数字化改造景观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-criteria decision making in evaluating digital retrofitting solutions: utilising AHP and TOPSIS
In an era of digital transformation, evaluating effective strategies for upgrading manufacturing systems is crucial to maintaining competitiveness. Digital retrofitting has become a strategic approach integrating new digital technologies into legacy systems to share data and align with Industry 4.0 principles. However, various techniques and criteria exist for implementing digital retrofitting. Despite its importance, there is a notable lack of studies assessing these retrofitting approaches using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methodologies. This study addresses this gap by employing two MCDM techniques: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). It assesses three digital retrofitting alternatives, starter kit solutions, embedded gateway solutions, and IoT hardware-based solutions, against ten critical criteria. These criteria were weighted through pairwise comparison analysis based on a survey of twelve industry practitioners to reflect industry preferences. The aim is to determine the most effective digital retrofitting approach to aid manufacturers in transitioning to Industry 4.0. This study addresses the complexities of managing conflicting criteria in digital transformation. Moreover, the results contribute to decision-making methodologies by demonstrating their practical applications, thus guiding manufacturers through the intricate landscape of digital retrofitting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信