Dario Valcarenghi , Angela Tolotti , Hansjoerg Vees , Valter Torri , Sarah Jayne Liptrott , Giovanni Presta , Andrea Puliatti , Laura Moser , Davide Sari , Mariacarla Valli
{"title":"Mepitel®膜与标准护理预防辅助放疗乳腺癌患者皮肤毒性:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Dario Valcarenghi , Angela Tolotti , Hansjoerg Vees , Valter Torri , Sarah Jayne Liptrott , Giovanni Presta , Andrea Puliatti , Laura Moser , Davide Sari , Mariacarla Valli","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background & purpose</h3><div>Radiotherapy plays a key role in breast cancer treatment however, radiation-induced dermatitis can impact on treatment delivery and patient quality of life.</div><div>The primary outcome was to compare Mepitel® Film versus standard treatment in preventing radiotherapy skin toxicity onset.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicentre randomised controlled phase III study compared standard treatment (aqueous-urea cream − Excipial U hydrolotion applied at the beginning of radiotherapy and antiseptic cream − Flammazine or Ialugen Plus applied at the onset of moist desquamation) versus Mepitel® Film in patients with breast cancer undergoing post-operative radiotherapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of moist desquamation (RTOG score ≥ 2) in the experimental and control groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study (2016–2020), 161 patients were randomized, 154 (95.7 %) were evaluable. Skin toxicity Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) score ≥ 2 was observed in 9.5 % and 13.9 % of experimental and control groups respectively (Relative Risk = 0.68, 95 %CI 0.28–1.66; p = 0.393). RTOG scores > 0 were 90.5 % and 94.9 % in experimental and control groups respectively (Relative Risk = 0.95, 95 %CI 0.87–1.04; p = 0.294).</div><div>Multivariable analysis, controlled for age, diabetes, BMI and smoking exposure, showed a risk reduction of RTOG > 0 of 38 % (HR = 0.62 95 %CI 0.49–0.96, p = 0.028), and a risk reduction of RTOG > 1 of 33 % (HR = 0.67 95 %CI 0.26–1.76, p = 0.420) in the experimental group.</div><div>The median time to recovery from RTOG grade > 0 toxicity was 17 and 32 days for experimental and control groups, respectively (p = 0.027). At multivariable analysis, time to recovery was 38 % faster in the experimental group (HR = 1.38 95 %CI (0.99–1.93) p = 0.059).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the study did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in RTOG > 2 skin toxicity, there was evidence of a reduction in the rate of skin toxicity and an improvement in time to recovery. The device was well tolerated by patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mepitel® film versus standard care for the prevention of skin toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Dario Valcarenghi , Angela Tolotti , Hansjoerg Vees , Valter Torri , Sarah Jayne Liptrott , Giovanni Presta , Andrea Puliatti , Laura Moser , Davide Sari , Mariacarla Valli\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background & purpose</h3><div>Radiotherapy plays a key role in breast cancer treatment however, radiation-induced dermatitis can impact on treatment delivery and patient quality of life.</div><div>The primary outcome was to compare Mepitel® Film versus standard treatment in preventing radiotherapy skin toxicity onset.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multicentre randomised controlled phase III study compared standard treatment (aqueous-urea cream − Excipial U hydrolotion applied at the beginning of radiotherapy and antiseptic cream − Flammazine or Ialugen Plus applied at the onset of moist desquamation) versus Mepitel® Film in patients with breast cancer undergoing post-operative radiotherapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of moist desquamation (RTOG score ≥ 2) in the experimental and control groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the study (2016–2020), 161 patients were randomized, 154 (95.7 %) were evaluable. Skin toxicity Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) score ≥ 2 was observed in 9.5 % and 13.9 % of experimental and control groups respectively (Relative Risk = 0.68, 95 %CI 0.28–1.66; p = 0.393). RTOG scores > 0 were 90.5 % and 94.9 % in experimental and control groups respectively (Relative Risk = 0.95, 95 %CI 0.87–1.04; p = 0.294).</div><div>Multivariable analysis, controlled for age, diabetes, BMI and smoking exposure, showed a risk reduction of RTOG > 0 of 38 % (HR = 0.62 95 %CI 0.49–0.96, p = 0.028), and a risk reduction of RTOG > 1 of 33 % (HR = 0.67 95 %CI 0.26–1.76, p = 0.420) in the experimental group.</div><div>The median time to recovery from RTOG grade > 0 toxicity was 17 and 32 days for experimental and control groups, respectively (p = 0.027). At multivariable analysis, time to recovery was 38 % faster in the experimental group (HR = 1.38 95 %CI (0.99–1.93) p = 0.059).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the study did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in RTOG > 2 skin toxicity, there was evidence of a reduction in the rate of skin toxicity and an improvement in time to recovery. The device was well tolerated by patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000266\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景,目的放射治疗在乳腺癌治疗中起着关键作用,然而,放射性皮炎会影响治疗的效果和患者的生活质量。主要结局是比较Mepitel®Film与标准治疗在预防放射治疗皮肤毒性发作方面的效果。方法一项多中心随机对照III期研究比较了标准治疗(在放疗开始时使用水尿素乳膏-表皮U水洗液和在湿性脱屑开始时使用抗菌乳膏- Flammazine或Ialugen Plus)与Mepitel®Film对乳腺癌术后放疗患者的影响。主要观察指标为实验组和对照组湿性脱屑比例(RTOG评分≥2)。结果在研究期间(2016-2020年),随机抽取161例患者,154例(95.7%)可评估。试验组和对照组皮肤毒性放射治疗肿瘤组(RTOG)评分≥2分的分别为9.5%和13.9%(相对危险度= 0.68,95% CI 0.28-1.66;p = 0.393)。RTOG分数>;实验组和对照组的相对危险度分别为90.5%和94.9%(相对危险度= 0.95,95% CI 0.87-1.04;p = 0.294)。多变量分析,控制年龄,糖尿病,BMI和吸烟暴露,显示RTOG的风险降低;0 = 38% (HR = 0.62 95% CI 0.49-0.96, p = 0.028), RTOG和gt的风险降低;1 / 33 (HR = 0.67 95% CI 0.26-1.76, p = 0.420)。从RTOG等级恢复的中位时间>;实验组和对照组毒性分别为17和32 d (p = 0.027)。在多变量分析中,实验组恢复时间快38% (HR = 1.38, 95% CI (0.99-1.93) p = 0.059)。结论:虽然该研究没有显示RTOG和gt的统计学显著降低;2 .皮肤毒性,有证据表明皮肤毒性发生率降低,恢复时间缩短。患者对该装置的耐受性良好。
Mepitel® film versus standard care for the prevention of skin toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy: A randomized controlled trial
Background & purpose
Radiotherapy plays a key role in breast cancer treatment however, radiation-induced dermatitis can impact on treatment delivery and patient quality of life.
The primary outcome was to compare Mepitel® Film versus standard treatment in preventing radiotherapy skin toxicity onset.
Methods
A multicentre randomised controlled phase III study compared standard treatment (aqueous-urea cream − Excipial U hydrolotion applied at the beginning of radiotherapy and antiseptic cream − Flammazine or Ialugen Plus applied at the onset of moist desquamation) versus Mepitel® Film in patients with breast cancer undergoing post-operative radiotherapy. The primary outcome was the proportion of moist desquamation (RTOG score ≥ 2) in the experimental and control groups.
Results
During the study (2016–2020), 161 patients were randomized, 154 (95.7 %) were evaluable. Skin toxicity Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) score ≥ 2 was observed in 9.5 % and 13.9 % of experimental and control groups respectively (Relative Risk = 0.68, 95 %CI 0.28–1.66; p = 0.393). RTOG scores > 0 were 90.5 % and 94.9 % in experimental and control groups respectively (Relative Risk = 0.95, 95 %CI 0.87–1.04; p = 0.294).
Multivariable analysis, controlled for age, diabetes, BMI and smoking exposure, showed a risk reduction of RTOG > 0 of 38 % (HR = 0.62 95 %CI 0.49–0.96, p = 0.028), and a risk reduction of RTOG > 1 of 33 % (HR = 0.67 95 %CI 0.26–1.76, p = 0.420) in the experimental group.
The median time to recovery from RTOG grade > 0 toxicity was 17 and 32 days for experimental and control groups, respectively (p = 0.027). At multivariable analysis, time to recovery was 38 % faster in the experimental group (HR = 1.38 95 %CI (0.99–1.93) p = 0.059).
Conclusions
Although the study did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in RTOG > 2 skin toxicity, there was evidence of a reduction in the rate of skin toxicity and an improvement in time to recovery. The device was well tolerated by patients.