{"title":"在开放、腹腔镜和机器人胰十二指肠切除术中应用双u针技术的标准化胰空肠吻合术","authors":"Jiang Liu , Jie Hua , Rong Tang , Wei Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2024.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Double U-Stitch technique in open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted involving 180 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, between November 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups: open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). The Double U-Stitch technique was applied in all cases and perioperative data were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All Double U-Stitch techniques were completed according to the standard, whether in the OPD group, LPD group, or RPD group. The average pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time was less than 25min (14.5min in the OPD group, 24.2min in the LPD group and 24.4min in the RPD group, P < 0.0001). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula was 11.6% in OPD group and 9.5% in minimally invasive group (LPD + RPD) (P > 0.05). There was a low incidence rate of postoperative complications which consisted of bile leak, intra-abdominal infection, hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. There was no 90-day mortality observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Double U-Stitch technique demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy across different surgical approaches for PD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized pancreaticojejunostomy by double U-stitch technique in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomies\",\"authors\":\"Jiang Liu , Jie Hua , Rong Tang , Wei Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cson.2024.100070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Double U-Stitch technique in open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted involving 180 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, between November 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups: open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). The Double U-Stitch technique was applied in all cases and perioperative data were collected.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All Double U-Stitch techniques were completed according to the standard, whether in the OPD group, LPD group, or RPD group. The average pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time was less than 25min (14.5min in the OPD group, 24.2min in the LPD group and 24.4min in the RPD group, P < 0.0001). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula was 11.6% in OPD group and 9.5% in minimally invasive group (LPD + RPD) (P > 0.05). There was a low incidence rate of postoperative complications which consisted of bile leak, intra-abdominal infection, hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. There was no 90-day mortality observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Double U-Stitch technique demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy across different surgical approaches for PD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前言:评价双u针技术在开放、腹腔镜和机器人胰十二指肠切除术中的疗效和安全性。材料与方法回顾性研究于2021年11月至2023年12月在复旦大学上海肿瘤中心胰腺外科行胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的180例患者。患者分为三组:开放胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)、腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)和机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)。所有病例均采用双u针技术,并收集围手术期资料。结果OPD组、LPD组、RPD组均按标准完成双u针穿刺。胰空肠吻合时间平均小于25min (OPD组14.5min, LPD组24.2min, RPD组24.4min), P <;0.0001)。临床相关胰瘘发生率在OPD组为11.6%,在微创组(LPD + RPD)为9.5% (P >;0.05)。术后并发症发生率低,包括胆漏、腹腔感染、出血和胃排空延迟。未观察到90天死亡率。结论双u针技术在不同手术入路治疗PD的安全性和有效性相当。
Standardized pancreaticojejunostomy by double U-stitch technique in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomies
Introduction
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Double U-Stitch technique in open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Materials and methods
A retrospective study was conducted involving 180 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, between November 2021 to December 2023. Patients were categorized into three groups: open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). The Double U-Stitch technique was applied in all cases and perioperative data were collected.
Results
All Double U-Stitch techniques were completed according to the standard, whether in the OPD group, LPD group, or RPD group. The average pancreaticojejunal anastomosis time was less than 25min (14.5min in the OPD group, 24.2min in the LPD group and 24.4min in the RPD group, P < 0.0001). The incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula was 11.6% in OPD group and 9.5% in minimally invasive group (LPD + RPD) (P > 0.05). There was a low incidence rate of postoperative complications which consisted of bile leak, intra-abdominal infection, hemorrhage, and delayed gastric emptying. There was no 90-day mortality observed.
Conclusion
The Double U-Stitch technique demonstrated comparable safety and efficacy across different surgical approaches for PD.