Michael Forster, Maryna Gozhenko, Rebekka Kraemer, Marc Höppner, Tim A. Steiert, Xiaoli Yi, Nicole Braun, Anja Tanck, Mona Elhadidi, Reza Mehrazin, Pamela Pinzani, Stefania Gelmini, Philipp Nuhn, Andre Franke Andre Franke, Ahmed Eraky
{"title":"尿液活检癌突变检测的重复性:样本越多越好","authors":"Michael Forster, Maryna Gozhenko, Rebekka Kraemer, Marc Höppner, Tim A. Steiert, Xiaoli Yi, Nicole Braun, Anja Tanck, Mona Elhadidi, Reza Mehrazin, Pamela Pinzani, Stefania Gelmini, Philipp Nuhn, Andre Franke Andre Franke, Ahmed Eraky","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Single urine samples are the standard for cytology examination of urothelial tumors. The detection of urothelial cancer mutations in urine is an emerging research field, but there is currently no evidence-based standard for the timing or frequency of sampling. Our primary objective was to investigate the repeatability of urothelial cancer mutations in urine samples of bladder cancer patients. Our secondary objective was to refine a panel of bladder cancer-associated genes for future diagnostic research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Urine samples from 39 bladder cancer patients were sequenced using a 127-gene panel. The Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to compare one urine sample versus multiple samples from the same patient with respect to mutation presence. For panel refinement, genes were considered if they were mutated in at least three patients of our cohort and confirmed by literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Somatic mutation presence in a single urine sample is incomplete compared to several samples (V=120, p=.0005843). Our refined set of 32 genes enabled bladder cancer- associated mutation detection in all 39 patients (100%). The mutational landscape was congruent with literature.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>More than one urine sample is needed to discover the mutational landscape in most bladder cancer patients, speculatively due to physiological or circadian reasons. Our refined set of 32 genes is probably sufficient for bladder cancer-associated mutation detection, even in a single sample. Urine-based mutation detection is promising for bladder cancer diagnostics and management, especially when multiple urine samples are used.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 3","pages":"Pages 16-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REPEATABILITY OF CANCER MUTATION DETECTION IN URINE LIQUID BIOPSY: MORE SAMPLES ARE BETTER\",\"authors\":\"Michael Forster, Maryna Gozhenko, Rebekka Kraemer, Marc Höppner, Tim A. Steiert, Xiaoli Yi, Nicole Braun, Anja Tanck, Mona Elhadidi, Reza Mehrazin, Pamela Pinzani, Stefania Gelmini, Philipp Nuhn, Andre Franke Andre Franke, Ahmed Eraky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Single urine samples are the standard for cytology examination of urothelial tumors. The detection of urothelial cancer mutations in urine is an emerging research field, but there is currently no evidence-based standard for the timing or frequency of sampling. Our primary objective was to investigate the repeatability of urothelial cancer mutations in urine samples of bladder cancer patients. Our secondary objective was to refine a panel of bladder cancer-associated genes for future diagnostic research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Urine samples from 39 bladder cancer patients were sequenced using a 127-gene panel. The Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to compare one urine sample versus multiple samples from the same patient with respect to mutation presence. For panel refinement, genes were considered if they were mutated in at least three patients of our cohort and confirmed by literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Somatic mutation presence in a single urine sample is incomplete compared to several samples (V=120, p=.0005843). Our refined set of 32 genes enabled bladder cancer- associated mutation detection in all 39 patients (100%). The mutational landscape was congruent with literature.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>More than one urine sample is needed to discover the mutational landscape in most bladder cancer patients, speculatively due to physiological or circadian reasons. Our refined set of 32 genes is probably sufficient for bladder cancer-associated mutation detection, even in a single sample. Urine-based mutation detection is promising for bladder cancer diagnostics and management, especially when multiple urine samples are used.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 16-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924008226\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924008226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
REPEATABILITY OF CANCER MUTATION DETECTION IN URINE LIQUID BIOPSY: MORE SAMPLES ARE BETTER
Introduction
Single urine samples are the standard for cytology examination of urothelial tumors. The detection of urothelial cancer mutations in urine is an emerging research field, but there is currently no evidence-based standard for the timing or frequency of sampling. Our primary objective was to investigate the repeatability of urothelial cancer mutations in urine samples of bladder cancer patients. Our secondary objective was to refine a panel of bladder cancer-associated genes for future diagnostic research.
Methods
Urine samples from 39 bladder cancer patients were sequenced using a 127-gene panel. The Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to compare one urine sample versus multiple samples from the same patient with respect to mutation presence. For panel refinement, genes were considered if they were mutated in at least three patients of our cohort and confirmed by literature.
Results
Somatic mutation presence in a single urine sample is incomplete compared to several samples (V=120, p=.0005843). Our refined set of 32 genes enabled bladder cancer- associated mutation detection in all 39 patients (100%). The mutational landscape was congruent with literature.
Conclusions
More than one urine sample is needed to discover the mutational landscape in most bladder cancer patients, speculatively due to physiological or circadian reasons. Our refined set of 32 genes is probably sufficient for bladder cancer-associated mutation detection, even in a single sample. Urine-based mutation detection is promising for bladder cancer diagnostics and management, especially when multiple urine samples are used.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.