肌肉浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗后机器人部分膀胱切除术:多模式膀胱保留方案的单中心经验

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Samuel Gold, Sidney Roberts, Vitaly Margulis
{"title":"肌肉浸润性膀胱癌新辅助化疗后机器人部分膀胱切除术:多模式膀胱保留方案的单中心经验","authors":"Samuel Gold,&nbsp;Sidney Roberts,&nbsp;Vitaly Margulis","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Utilizing advances in multimodal treatment paradigms and minimally invasive surgical techniques, we investigated the role of robotic-assisted partial cystectomy (RAPC) as an alternative to radical cystectomy in a select cohort of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Along with standard-of-care neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, we sought to assess whether RAPC provides similar oncologic efficacy as radical cystectomy with reduced rates of associated morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with MIBC of primarily urothelial origin who underwent platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RAPC at our institution between 2018-2023. Patients with MIBC and unifocal tumors at the anterior, anterolateral bladder, or bladder dome were considered for RAPC. Biopsy and restaging was performed with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Immediately prior to RAPC, intravesical chemotherapy was administered. A robotic transperitoneal approach was used with concurrent cystoscopy to guide bladder resection. Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed. Pathology data was collected after each surgical episode. Primary endpoint was 30-day complications. Secondary endpoints included intravesical recurrences, disease progression to metastasis, systemic chemotherapy/immunotherapy, and/or death.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Median operative time was 289 minutes (IQR 229-312) and EBL was 100 mL (IQR 75-150). No patients experienced intraoperative complications, 11/17 (65%) were discharged on postoperative day 1. There was one 30-day complication: pelvic abscess requiring percutaneous drain placement and IV antibiotics.</div><div>Eight patients were ypT0 (47%) after RAPC. Of the seven patients who had no malignancy on post-NAC TURBT, 6/7 (86%) were ypT0 and one was ypTIS. Seven patients (41%) had MIBC on final pathology. No patients had positive margins.</div><div>Median follow-up was 6.8 months (IQR 3.7-20.3) with 7 patients having follow-up &gt;12 months. Three (19%) had intravesical recurrences: CIS (x2) and MIBC with CIS (x1). Time to recurrence ranged 7.2-12.5 months. No patients required salvage cystectomy. One patient developed metastatic progression; he was ypT0 after RAPC. Two patients died; neither had evidence of disease at times of death.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While the gold standard treatment for MIBC remains platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, there is significant morbidity associated with this surgical intervention. In a selected patient population, RAPC may serve as a less toxic surgical alternative. In this study population, RAPC is shown to be a safe procedure with minimal long-term morbidity. In the short term, response to NAC predicted pathologic complete response after RAPC. Durability of response is an ongoing focus of this study, but only one patient developed new metastatic disease and no patients required salvage cystectomy. Our study represents an initial effort to assess this treatment paradigm and serves as a foundation for further efforts to evaluate its role in management of MIBC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"43 3","pages":"Pages 14-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ROBOTIC PARTIAL CYSTECTOMY FOLLOWING NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE WITH A MULTIMODAL BLADDER-PRESERVING REGIMEN\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Gold,&nbsp;Sidney Roberts,&nbsp;Vitaly Margulis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.12.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Utilizing advances in multimodal treatment paradigms and minimally invasive surgical techniques, we investigated the role of robotic-assisted partial cystectomy (RAPC) as an alternative to radical cystectomy in a select cohort of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Along with standard-of-care neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, we sought to assess whether RAPC provides similar oncologic efficacy as radical cystectomy with reduced rates of associated morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with MIBC of primarily urothelial origin who underwent platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RAPC at our institution between 2018-2023. Patients with MIBC and unifocal tumors at the anterior, anterolateral bladder, or bladder dome were considered for RAPC. Biopsy and restaging was performed with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Immediately prior to RAPC, intravesical chemotherapy was administered. A robotic transperitoneal approach was used with concurrent cystoscopy to guide bladder resection. Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed. Pathology data was collected after each surgical episode. Primary endpoint was 30-day complications. Secondary endpoints included intravesical recurrences, disease progression to metastasis, systemic chemotherapy/immunotherapy, and/or death.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Median operative time was 289 minutes (IQR 229-312) and EBL was 100 mL (IQR 75-150). No patients experienced intraoperative complications, 11/17 (65%) were discharged on postoperative day 1. There was one 30-day complication: pelvic abscess requiring percutaneous drain placement and IV antibiotics.</div><div>Eight patients were ypT0 (47%) after RAPC. Of the seven patients who had no malignancy on post-NAC TURBT, 6/7 (86%) were ypT0 and one was ypTIS. Seven patients (41%) had MIBC on final pathology. No patients had positive margins.</div><div>Median follow-up was 6.8 months (IQR 3.7-20.3) with 7 patients having follow-up &gt;12 months. Three (19%) had intravesical recurrences: CIS (x2) and MIBC with CIS (x1). Time to recurrence ranged 7.2-12.5 months. No patients required salvage cystectomy. One patient developed metastatic progression; he was ypT0 after RAPC. Two patients died; neither had evidence of disease at times of death.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While the gold standard treatment for MIBC remains platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, there is significant morbidity associated with this surgical intervention. In a selected patient population, RAPC may serve as a less toxic surgical alternative. In this study population, RAPC is shown to be a safe procedure with minimal long-term morbidity. In the short term, response to NAC predicted pathologic complete response after RAPC. Durability of response is an ongoing focus of this study, but only one patient developed new metastatic disease and no patients required salvage cystectomy. Our study represents an initial effort to assess this treatment paradigm and serves as a foundation for further efforts to evaluate its role in management of MIBC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 14-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924008172\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924008172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用多模式治疗模式和微创手术技术的进展,我们研究了机器人辅助部分膀胱切除术(RAPC)作为肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者根治性膀胱切除术的替代方案的作用。与标准治疗的新辅助铂基化疗一起,我们试图评估RAPC是否提供与根治性膀胱切除术相似的肿瘤疗效,并降低相关发病率。方法回顾性分析2018-2023年在我院接受以铂为基础的新辅助化疗(NAC)和RAPC的所有主要尿路上皮源性MIBC患者。在膀胱前部、膀胱前外侧或膀胱穹窿有MIBC和单灶性肿瘤的患者可考虑行RAPC。经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(turt)行活检和再切术。在RAPC之前,立即进行膀胱内化疗。采用机器人经腹膜入路联合膀胱镜指导膀胱切除术。行双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术。每次手术后收集病理资料。主要终点为30天并发症。次要终点包括膀胱内复发、疾病进展到转移、全身化疗/免疫治疗和/或死亡。结果17例患者符合纳入标准。中位手术时间289分钟(IQR 229-312), EBL 100 mL (IQR 75-150)。无术中并发症发生,11/17(65%)患者术后第1天出院。有一个30天的并发症:盆腔脓肿需要经皮引流和静脉注射抗生素。经RAPC治疗后,8例患者(47%)为ypT0。nac术后TURBT无恶性肿瘤的7例患者中,6/7(86%)为ypT0, 1例为ypTIS。7例(41%)患者在最终病理上有MIBC。没有患者的边缘呈阳性。中位随访6.8个月(IQR 3.7 ~ 20.3), 7例患者随访12个月。3例(19%)膀胱内复发:CIS (x2)和MIBC合并CIS (x1)。复发时间为7.2 ~ 12.5个月。无患者需要补救性膀胱切除术。1例患者出现转移进展;他是RAPC之后的第10名。2例死亡;两人死亡时都没有患病的迹象。结论:虽然MIBC的金标准治疗仍然是铂基化疗,然后根治性膀胱切除术,但这种手术干预存在显著的发病率。在选定的患者群体中,RAPC可作为毒性较小的手术选择。在本研究人群中,RAPC被证明是一种安全的手术,长期发病率最低。在短期内,对NAC的反应预测了RAPC后的病理完全缓解。反应的持久性是本研究的持续焦点,但只有一名患者出现新的转移性疾病,没有患者需要补救性膀胱切除术。我们的研究代表了评估这种治疗模式的初步努力,并为进一步评估其在MIBC管理中的作用奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ROBOTIC PARTIAL CYSTECTOMY FOLLOWING NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE WITH A MULTIMODAL BLADDER-PRESERVING REGIMEN

Introduction

Utilizing advances in multimodal treatment paradigms and minimally invasive surgical techniques, we investigated the role of robotic-assisted partial cystectomy (RAPC) as an alternative to radical cystectomy in a select cohort of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Along with standard-of-care neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, we sought to assess whether RAPC provides similar oncologic efficacy as radical cystectomy with reduced rates of associated morbidity.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with MIBC of primarily urothelial origin who underwent platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and RAPC at our institution between 2018-2023. Patients with MIBC and unifocal tumors at the anterior, anterolateral bladder, or bladder dome were considered for RAPC. Biopsy and restaging was performed with transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Immediately prior to RAPC, intravesical chemotherapy was administered. A robotic transperitoneal approach was used with concurrent cystoscopy to guide bladder resection. Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection was performed. Pathology data was collected after each surgical episode. Primary endpoint was 30-day complications. Secondary endpoints included intravesical recurrences, disease progression to metastasis, systemic chemotherapy/immunotherapy, and/or death.

Results

Seventeen patients met inclusion criteria. Median operative time was 289 minutes (IQR 229-312) and EBL was 100 mL (IQR 75-150). No patients experienced intraoperative complications, 11/17 (65%) were discharged on postoperative day 1. There was one 30-day complication: pelvic abscess requiring percutaneous drain placement and IV antibiotics.
Eight patients were ypT0 (47%) after RAPC. Of the seven patients who had no malignancy on post-NAC TURBT, 6/7 (86%) were ypT0 and one was ypTIS. Seven patients (41%) had MIBC on final pathology. No patients had positive margins.
Median follow-up was 6.8 months (IQR 3.7-20.3) with 7 patients having follow-up >12 months. Three (19%) had intravesical recurrences: CIS (x2) and MIBC with CIS (x1). Time to recurrence ranged 7.2-12.5 months. No patients required salvage cystectomy. One patient developed metastatic progression; he was ypT0 after RAPC. Two patients died; neither had evidence of disease at times of death.

Conclusions

While the gold standard treatment for MIBC remains platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, there is significant morbidity associated with this surgical intervention. In a selected patient population, RAPC may serve as a less toxic surgical alternative. In this study population, RAPC is shown to be a safe procedure with minimal long-term morbidity. In the short term, response to NAC predicted pathologic complete response after RAPC. Durability of response is an ongoing focus of this study, but only one patient developed new metastatic disease and no patients required salvage cystectomy. Our study represents an initial effort to assess this treatment paradigm and serves as a foundation for further efforts to evaluate its role in management of MIBC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信