面向微服务架构的资源高效响应式和主动自动扩展

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Hussain Ahmad , Christoph Treude , Markus Wagner , Claudia Szabo
{"title":"面向微服务架构的资源高效响应式和主动自动扩展","authors":"Hussain Ahmad ,&nbsp;Christoph Treude ,&nbsp;Markus Wagner ,&nbsp;Claudia Szabo","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microservice architectures have become increasingly popular in both academia and industry, providing enhanced agility, elasticity, and maintainability in software development and deployment. To simplify scaling operations in microservice architectures, container orchestration platforms such as Kubernetes feature Horizontal Pod Auto-scalers (HPAs) designed to adjust the resources of microservices to accommodate fluctuating workloads. However, existing HPAs are not suitable for resource-constrained environments, as they make scaling decisions based on the individual resource capacities of microservices, leading to service unavailability, resource mismanagement, and financial losses. Furthermore, the inherent delay in initializing and terminating microservice pods hinders HPAs from timely responding to workload fluctuations, further exacerbating these issues. To address these concerns, we propose Smart HPA and ProSmart HPA, reactive and proactive resource-efficient horizontal pod auto-scalers respectively. Smart HPA employs a reactive scaling policy that facilitates resource exchange among microservices, optimizing auto-scaling in resource-constrained environments. For ProSmart HPA, we develop a machine-learning-driven resource-efficient scaling policy that proactively manages resource demands to address delays caused by microservice pod startup and termination, while enabling preemptive resource sharing in resource-constrained environments. Our experimental results show that Smart HPA outperforms the Kubernetes baseline HPA, while ProSmart HPA exceeds both Smart HPA and Kubernetes HPA by reducing resource overutilization, overprovisioning, and underprovisioning, and increasing resource allocation to microservice applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"225 ","pages":"Article 112390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards resource-efficient reactive and proactive auto-scaling for microservice architectures\",\"authors\":\"Hussain Ahmad ,&nbsp;Christoph Treude ,&nbsp;Markus Wagner ,&nbsp;Claudia Szabo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2025.112390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Microservice architectures have become increasingly popular in both academia and industry, providing enhanced agility, elasticity, and maintainability in software development and deployment. To simplify scaling operations in microservice architectures, container orchestration platforms such as Kubernetes feature Horizontal Pod Auto-scalers (HPAs) designed to adjust the resources of microservices to accommodate fluctuating workloads. However, existing HPAs are not suitable for resource-constrained environments, as they make scaling decisions based on the individual resource capacities of microservices, leading to service unavailability, resource mismanagement, and financial losses. Furthermore, the inherent delay in initializing and terminating microservice pods hinders HPAs from timely responding to workload fluctuations, further exacerbating these issues. To address these concerns, we propose Smart HPA and ProSmart HPA, reactive and proactive resource-efficient horizontal pod auto-scalers respectively. Smart HPA employs a reactive scaling policy that facilitates resource exchange among microservices, optimizing auto-scaling in resource-constrained environments. For ProSmart HPA, we develop a machine-learning-driven resource-efficient scaling policy that proactively manages resource demands to address delays caused by microservice pod startup and termination, while enabling preemptive resource sharing in resource-constrained environments. Our experimental results show that Smart HPA outperforms the Kubernetes baseline HPA, while ProSmart HPA exceeds both Smart HPA and Kubernetes HPA by reducing resource overutilization, overprovisioning, and underprovisioning, and increasing resource allocation to microservice applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"225 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225000585\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121225000585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微服务架构在学术界和工业界都变得越来越流行,在软件开发和部署中提供了增强的敏捷性、弹性和可维护性。为了简化微服务架构中的伸缩操作,Kubernetes等容器编排平台提供了横向Pod自动伸缩器(hpa),旨在调整微服务的资源以适应波动的工作负载。然而,现有的hpa不适合资源受限的环境,因为它们根据微服务的单个资源容量做出扩展决策,从而导致服务不可用、资源管理不当和财务损失。此外,初始化和终止微服务pod的固有延迟阻碍了hpa及时响应工作负载波动,进一步加剧了这些问题。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了Smart HPA和ProSmart HPA,分别是被动的和主动的资源节能型水平pod自动缩放器。智能HPA采用响应式扩展策略,促进微服务之间的资源交换,优化资源受限环境中的自动扩展。对于ProSmart HPA,我们开发了一种机器学习驱动的资源高效扩展策略,主动管理资源需求,以解决微服务pod启动和终止造成的延迟,同时在资源受限的环境中实现抢占式资源共享。我们的实验结果表明,Smart HPA优于Kubernetes基准HPA,而ProSmart HPA通过减少资源过度利用、过度供应和不足,以及增加微服务应用的资源分配,超过了Smart HPA和Kubernetes HPA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards resource-efficient reactive and proactive auto-scaling for microservice architectures
Microservice architectures have become increasingly popular in both academia and industry, providing enhanced agility, elasticity, and maintainability in software development and deployment. To simplify scaling operations in microservice architectures, container orchestration platforms such as Kubernetes feature Horizontal Pod Auto-scalers (HPAs) designed to adjust the resources of microservices to accommodate fluctuating workloads. However, existing HPAs are not suitable for resource-constrained environments, as they make scaling decisions based on the individual resource capacities of microservices, leading to service unavailability, resource mismanagement, and financial losses. Furthermore, the inherent delay in initializing and terminating microservice pods hinders HPAs from timely responding to workload fluctuations, further exacerbating these issues. To address these concerns, we propose Smart HPA and ProSmart HPA, reactive and proactive resource-efficient horizontal pod auto-scalers respectively. Smart HPA employs a reactive scaling policy that facilitates resource exchange among microservices, optimizing auto-scaling in resource-constrained environments. For ProSmart HPA, we develop a machine-learning-driven resource-efficient scaling policy that proactively manages resource demands to address delays caused by microservice pod startup and termination, while enabling preemptive resource sharing in resource-constrained environments. Our experimental results show that Smart HPA outperforms the Kubernetes baseline HPA, while ProSmart HPA exceeds both Smart HPA and Kubernetes HPA by reducing resource overutilization, overprovisioning, and underprovisioning, and increasing resource allocation to microservice applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信