单肺移植治疗肺纤维化:副作用重要吗?

Frank Langer , Ina Starniske , Bettina Weingard , Parviz Aliyev , Migdat Mustafi , Robert Bals , Heinrike Wilkens
{"title":"单肺移植治疗肺纤维化:副作用重要吗?","authors":"Frank Langer ,&nbsp;Ina Starniske ,&nbsp;Bettina Weingard ,&nbsp;Parviz Aliyev ,&nbsp;Migdat Mustafi ,&nbsp;Robert Bals ,&nbsp;Heinrike Wilkens","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The implementation of the Lung Allocation Score in the Eurotransplant international collaborative framework decreased waiting list mortality, but organ shortage remains a significant problem. Single lung transplantation (sLTx)—whenever possible—may decrease waiting list mortality. We have consistently employed sLTx for recipients with pulmonary fibrosis. In the current investigation, we sought to analyze if this strategy can lead to an acceptable long-term outcome and if the side of sLTx has an impact on the outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 1995 and 2024, we performed 138 sLTx for patients with pulmonary fibrosis (54 ± 9 years, 88 male). Data and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively comparing recipients receiving left sLTX (<em>n</em> = 98) and right sLTx (<em>n</em> = 40).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survival was 83%, 59%, and 29% at 1, 5, and 10 years for the total patient cohort. Survival was similar for left and right sLTx (83 vs 81%, 58 vs 64%, and 29 vs 28% at 1, 5, and 10 years, <em>p</em> = 0.54). Left and right transplantations lead to similar best post-transplant forced expiratory volume per second (74% ± 20% vs 74% ± 21%, <em>p</em> = 0.86). While the total lung capacity (TLC) ratio TLC<sub>donor</sub>/predicted TLC<sub>recipient</sub> was similar between groups (104% vs 100%), the ratio TLC<sub>donor</sub>/actual TLC<sub>recipient</sub> was higher in left sLTx (185% vs 158%, <em>p</em> = 0.04). On multivariate regression analysis, postoperative pneumonia (<em>p</em> = 0.003, hazard ratio 3.404) and sepsis (<em>p</em> = 0.002, hazard ratio 10.700) were identified as predictors for early mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Performing sLTx for pulmonary fibrosis patients can be an effective strategy to optimize donor utilization and improve outcomes—irrespective of graft side.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis: Does side matter?\",\"authors\":\"Frank Langer ,&nbsp;Ina Starniske ,&nbsp;Bettina Weingard ,&nbsp;Parviz Aliyev ,&nbsp;Migdat Mustafi ,&nbsp;Robert Bals ,&nbsp;Heinrike Wilkens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The implementation of the Lung Allocation Score in the Eurotransplant international collaborative framework decreased waiting list mortality, but organ shortage remains a significant problem. Single lung transplantation (sLTx)—whenever possible—may decrease waiting list mortality. We have consistently employed sLTx for recipients with pulmonary fibrosis. In the current investigation, we sought to analyze if this strategy can lead to an acceptable long-term outcome and if the side of sLTx has an impact on the outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 1995 and 2024, we performed 138 sLTx for patients with pulmonary fibrosis (54 ± 9 years, 88 male). Data and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively comparing recipients receiving left sLTX (<em>n</em> = 98) and right sLTx (<em>n</em> = 40).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Survival was 83%, 59%, and 29% at 1, 5, and 10 years for the total patient cohort. Survival was similar for left and right sLTx (83 vs 81%, 58 vs 64%, and 29 vs 28% at 1, 5, and 10 years, <em>p</em> = 0.54). Left and right transplantations lead to similar best post-transplant forced expiratory volume per second (74% ± 20% vs 74% ± 21%, <em>p</em> = 0.86). While the total lung capacity (TLC) ratio TLC<sub>donor</sub>/predicted TLC<sub>recipient</sub> was similar between groups (104% vs 100%), the ratio TLC<sub>donor</sub>/actual TLC<sub>recipient</sub> was higher in left sLTx (185% vs 158%, <em>p</em> = 0.04). On multivariate regression analysis, postoperative pneumonia (<em>p</em> = 0.003, hazard ratio 3.404) and sepsis (<em>p</em> = 0.002, hazard ratio 10.700) were identified as predictors for early mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Performing sLTx for pulmonary fibrosis patients can be an effective strategy to optimize donor utilization and improve outcomes—irrespective of graft side.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JHLT Open\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JHLT Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425000242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133425000242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲移植国际合作框架中实施肺分配评分降低了等待名单死亡率,但器官短缺仍然是一个重大问题。单肺移植(sLTx) -只要可能-可以降低等候名单死亡率。我们一直使用sLTx治疗肺纤维化患者。在目前的研究中,我们试图分析这种策略是否能导致可接受的长期结果,以及sLTx的副作用是否对结果有影响。方法1995年至2024年间,我们对138例肺纤维化患者(54±9岁,男性88例)进行了sLTx治疗。回顾性分析数据和结果,比较接受左侧sLTX (n = 98)和右侧sLTX (n = 40)的患者。结果在整个患者队列中,1年、5年和10年生存率分别为83%、59%和29%。左、右sLTx的生存率相似(1年、5年和10年生存率分别为83比81%、58比64%和29比28%,p = 0.54)。左肺和右肺移植的最佳用力呼气量相似(74%±20% vs 74%±21%,p = 0.86)。虽然两组间TLC供体/预测tl受体的比率相似(104% vs 100%),但左侧sLTx的TLC供体/实际tl受体的比率较高(185% vs 158%, p = 0.04)。在多因素回归分析中,术后肺炎(p = 0.003,风险比3.404)和脓毒症(p = 0.002,风险比10.700)被确定为早期死亡的预测因素。结论肺纤维化患者行sLTx是优化供体利用率和改善预后的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis: Does side matter?

Background

The implementation of the Lung Allocation Score in the Eurotransplant international collaborative framework decreased waiting list mortality, but organ shortage remains a significant problem. Single lung transplantation (sLTx)—whenever possible—may decrease waiting list mortality. We have consistently employed sLTx for recipients with pulmonary fibrosis. In the current investigation, we sought to analyze if this strategy can lead to an acceptable long-term outcome and if the side of sLTx has an impact on the outcome.

Methods

Between 1995 and 2024, we performed 138 sLTx for patients with pulmonary fibrosis (54 ± 9 years, 88 male). Data and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively comparing recipients receiving left sLTX (n = 98) and right sLTx (n = 40).

Results

Survival was 83%, 59%, and 29% at 1, 5, and 10 years for the total patient cohort. Survival was similar for left and right sLTx (83 vs 81%, 58 vs 64%, and 29 vs 28% at 1, 5, and 10 years, p = 0.54). Left and right transplantations lead to similar best post-transplant forced expiratory volume per second (74% ± 20% vs 74% ± 21%, p = 0.86). While the total lung capacity (TLC) ratio TLCdonor/predicted TLCrecipient was similar between groups (104% vs 100%), the ratio TLCdonor/actual TLCrecipient was higher in left sLTx (185% vs 158%, p = 0.04). On multivariate regression analysis, postoperative pneumonia (p = 0.003, hazard ratio 3.404) and sepsis (p = 0.002, hazard ratio 10.700) were identified as predictors for early mortality.

Conclusions

Performing sLTx for pulmonary fibrosis patients can be an effective strategy to optimize donor utilization and improve outcomes—irrespective of graft side.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信