达拉单抗/来那度胺/地塞米松治疗不适合移植的新诊断骨髓瘤:MAIA的长期结果

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Thierry Facon, Philippe Moreau, Katja Weisel, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Saad Z. Usmani, Ajai Chari, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Nizar Bahlis, Supratik Basu, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Caroline Jacquet, Christopher P. Venner, Noopur Raje, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, Gordon Cook, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar
{"title":"达拉单抗/来那度胺/地塞米松治疗不适合移植的新诊断骨髓瘤:MAIA的长期结果","authors":"Thierry Facon, Philippe Moreau, Katja Weisel, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Saad Z. Usmani, Ajai Chari, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Nizar Bahlis, Supratik Basu, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Caroline Jacquet, Christopher P. Venner, Noopur Raje, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, Gordon Cook, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02505-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the MAIA study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report updated efficacy and safety from MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), including a subgroup analysis by patient age (<70, ≥70 to <75, ≥75, and ≥80 years). Overall, 737 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint, PFS, was improved with D-Rd versus Rd (median, 61.9 vs 34.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.67; P < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the D-Rd group versus 65.5 months in the Rd group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.83; P = 0.0003); estimated 60-month OS rates were 66.6% and 53.6%, respectively. D-Rd achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR; 51.1% vs 30.1%), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (32.1% vs 11.1%), and sustained MRD negativity (≥18 months: 16.8% vs 3.3%) versus Rd (all P < 0.0001). D-Rd demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across age groups. No new safety concerns were observed. Updated results (median follow-up, >5 years) continue to support frontline use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM.","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"39 4","pages":"942-950"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02505-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Thierry Facon, Philippe Moreau, Katja Weisel, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Saad Z. Usmani, Ajai Chari, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Nizar Bahlis, Supratik Basu, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Caroline Jacquet, Christopher P. Venner, Noopur Raje, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, Gordon Cook, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41375-024-02505-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the MAIA study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report updated efficacy and safety from MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), including a subgroup analysis by patient age (<70, ≥70 to <75, ≥75, and ≥80 years). Overall, 737 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint, PFS, was improved with D-Rd versus Rd (median, 61.9 vs 34.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.67; P < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the D-Rd group versus 65.5 months in the Rd group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.83; P = 0.0003); estimated 60-month OS rates were 66.6% and 53.6%, respectively. D-Rd achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR; 51.1% vs 30.1%), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (32.1% vs 11.1%), and sustained MRD negativity (≥18 months: 16.8% vs 3.3%) versus Rd (all P < 0.0001). D-Rd demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across age groups. No new safety concerns were observed. Updated results (median follow-up, >5 years) continue to support frontline use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"942-950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02505-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02505-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02505-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在MAIA研究中,达拉单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松(D-Rd)在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)不适合移植的患者中,比单独来那度胺和地塞米松(Rd)改善了无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。我们报告了MAIA的最新疗效和安全性(中位随访,64.5个月),包括按患者年龄(70岁、≥70岁至75岁、≥75岁和≥80岁)进行的亚组分析。总体而言,737名不适合移植的NDMM患者以1:1的比例随机分配到D-Rd或Rd组。D-Rd组与Rd组的主要终点PFS得到改善(中位数为61.9个月vs 34.4个月;风险比[HR], 0.55;95%置信区间[CI], 0.45-0.67;P < 0.0001)。D-Rd组未达到中位总生存期,而Rd组为65.5个月(HR, 0.66;95% ci, 0.53-0.83;p = 0.0003);60个月的OS率分别为66.6%和53.6%。D-Rd获得更高的完全缓解率或更好的完全缓解率(≥CR;51.1% vs 30.1%),最小残留病(MRD)阴性(32.1% vs 11.1%)和持续MRD阴性(≥18个月:16.8% vs 3.3%)与Rd(均P <; 0.0001)相比。D-Rd在各年龄组均表现出临床意义的疗效益处。没有发现新的安全隐患。最新结果(中位随访5年)继续支持在不适合移植的NDMM患者中一线使用D-Rd。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes

Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes

Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes
In the MAIA study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report updated efficacy and safety from MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), including a subgroup analysis by patient age (<70, ≥70 to <75, ≥75, and ≥80 years). Overall, 737 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint, PFS, was improved with D-Rd versus Rd (median, 61.9 vs 34.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.67; P < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the D-Rd group versus 65.5 months in the Rd group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.83; P = 0.0003); estimated 60-month OS rates were 66.6% and 53.6%, respectively. D-Rd achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR; 51.1% vs 30.1%), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (32.1% vs 11.1%), and sustained MRD negativity (≥18 months: 16.8% vs 3.3%) versus Rd (all P < 0.0001). D-Rd demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across age groups. No new safety concerns were observed. Updated results (median follow-up, >5 years) continue to support frontline use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia
Leukemia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
3.50%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Title: Leukemia Journal Overview: Publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research Covers all aspects of research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases Includes studies of normal hemopoiesis due to comparative relevance Topics of Interest: Oncogenes Growth factors Stem cells Leukemia genomics Cell cycle Signal transduction Molecular targets for therapy And more Content Types: Original research articles Reviews Letters Correspondence Comments elaborating on significant advances and covering topical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信