Thierry Facon, Philippe Moreau, Katja Weisel, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Saad Z. Usmani, Ajai Chari, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Nizar Bahlis, Supratik Basu, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Caroline Jacquet, Christopher P. Venner, Noopur Raje, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, Gordon Cook, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar
{"title":"达拉单抗/来那度胺/地塞米松治疗不适合移植的新诊断骨髓瘤:MAIA的长期结果","authors":"Thierry Facon, Philippe Moreau, Katja Weisel, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Saad Z. Usmani, Ajai Chari, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Nizar Bahlis, Supratik Basu, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Caroline Jacquet, Christopher P. Venner, Noopur Raje, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, Gordon Cook, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar","doi":"10.1038/s41375-024-02505-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the MAIA study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report updated efficacy and safety from MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), including a subgroup analysis by patient age (<70, ≥70 to <75, ≥75, and ≥80 years). Overall, 737 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint, PFS, was improved with D-Rd versus Rd (median, 61.9 vs 34.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.67; P < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the D-Rd group versus 65.5 months in the Rd group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.83; P = 0.0003); estimated 60-month OS rates were 66.6% and 53.6%, respectively. D-Rd achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR; 51.1% vs 30.1%), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (32.1% vs 11.1%), and sustained MRD negativity (≥18 months: 16.8% vs 3.3%) versus Rd (all P < 0.0001). D-Rd demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across age groups. No new safety concerns were observed. Updated results (median follow-up, >5 years) continue to support frontline use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM.","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":"39 4","pages":"942-950"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02505-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Thierry Facon, Philippe Moreau, Katja Weisel, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Saad Z. Usmani, Ajai Chari, Torben Plesner, Robert Z. Orlowski, Nizar Bahlis, Supratik Basu, Cyrille Hulin, Hang Quach, Michael O’Dwyer, Aurore Perrot, Caroline Jacquet, Christopher P. Venner, Noopur Raje, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, Xavier Leleu, Gordon Cook, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Maria Krevvata, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Shaji K. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41375-024-02505-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the MAIA study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report updated efficacy and safety from MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), including a subgroup analysis by patient age (<70, ≥70 to <75, ≥75, and ≥80 years). Overall, 737 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint, PFS, was improved with D-Rd versus Rd (median, 61.9 vs 34.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.67; P < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the D-Rd group versus 65.5 months in the Rd group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.83; P = 0.0003); estimated 60-month OS rates were 66.6% and 53.6%, respectively. D-Rd achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR; 51.1% vs 30.1%), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (32.1% vs 11.1%), and sustained MRD negativity (≥18 months: 16.8% vs 3.3%) versus Rd (all P < 0.0001). D-Rd demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across age groups. No new safety concerns were observed. Updated results (median follow-up, >5 years) continue to support frontline use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"942-950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02505-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02505-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-024-02505-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在MAIA研究中,达拉单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松(D-Rd)在新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)不适合移植的患者中,比单独来那度胺和地塞米松(Rd)改善了无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。我们报告了MAIA的最新疗效和安全性(中位随访,64.5个月),包括按患者年龄(70岁、≥70岁至75岁、≥75岁和≥80岁)进行的亚组分析。总体而言,737名不适合移植的NDMM患者以1:1的比例随机分配到D-Rd或Rd组。D-Rd组与Rd组的主要终点PFS得到改善(中位数为61.9个月vs 34.4个月;风险比[HR], 0.55;95%置信区间[CI], 0.45-0.67;P < 0.0001)。D-Rd组未达到中位总生存期,而Rd组为65.5个月(HR, 0.66;95% ci, 0.53-0.83;p = 0.0003);60个月的OS率分别为66.6%和53.6%。D-Rd获得更高的完全缓解率或更好的完全缓解率(≥CR;51.1% vs 30.1%),最小残留病(MRD)阴性(32.1% vs 11.1%)和持续MRD阴性(≥18个月:16.8% vs 3.3%)与Rd(均P <; 0.0001)相比。D-Rd在各年龄组均表现出临床意义的疗效益处。没有发现新的安全隐患。最新结果(中位随访5年)继续支持在不适合移植的NDMM患者中一线使用D-Rd。
Daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma: MAIA long-term outcomes
In the MAIA study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report updated efficacy and safety from MAIA (median follow-up, 64.5 months), including a subgroup analysis by patient age (<70, ≥70 to <75, ≥75, and ≥80 years). Overall, 737 transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM were randomized 1:1 to D-Rd or Rd. The primary endpoint, PFS, was improved with D-Rd versus Rd (median, 61.9 vs 34.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.67; P < 0.0001). Median OS was not reached in the D-Rd group versus 65.5 months in the Rd group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.83; P = 0.0003); estimated 60-month OS rates were 66.6% and 53.6%, respectively. D-Rd achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR; 51.1% vs 30.1%), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (32.1% vs 11.1%), and sustained MRD negativity (≥18 months: 16.8% vs 3.3%) versus Rd (all P < 0.0001). D-Rd demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy benefits across age groups. No new safety concerns were observed. Updated results (median follow-up, >5 years) continue to support frontline use of D-Rd in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM.
期刊介绍:
Title: Leukemia
Journal Overview:
Publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research
Covers all aspects of research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases
Includes studies of normal hemopoiesis due to comparative relevance
Topics of Interest:
Oncogenes
Growth factors
Stem cells
Leukemia genomics
Cell cycle
Signal transduction
Molecular targets for therapy
And more
Content Types:
Original research articles
Reviews
Letters
Correspondence
Comments elaborating on significant advances and covering topical issues