Brandon T Paul, Vincent Trinh, Joseph Chen, Trung Le, Vincent Lin, Andrew Dimitrijevic
{"title":"人工耳蜗使用者的语言结果依赖于植入前后测量的视觉跨模态皮层活动。","authors":"Brandon T Paul, Vincent Trinh, Joseph Chen, Trung Le, Vincent Lin, Andrew Dimitrijevic","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cochlear implants can partially restore hearing function in deaf individuals, but long-term speech listening outcomes vary widely across cochlear implant users. Visual cross-modal plasticity, where auditory cortical neurons upregulate visual inputs to assist visual processing, is one factor proposed to worsen cochlear implant users' speech outcomes because it may limit auditory processing capability. However, evidence for this view is conflicting, and the relationship of cross-modal activity to speech perception may depend on other variables such as the type of visual activity and when it is assessed. To clarify, we measured visual cross-modal activity during a silent lip reading task using EEG in a cross-sectional, observational study. The study tested visual brain activation in 14 individuals prior to receiving a cochlear implant, 15 individuals tested at least 1 year after receiving and using a cochlear implant and 13 typical hearing controls who did not use a cochlear implant or hearing aid. Cross-modal responses to the onset of a visual event were positively correlated to speech outcomes in cochlear implant users tested after surgery but were negatively correlated in those tested prior to cochlear implant surgery. In addition, cross-modal increases in neural oscillatory power in the alpha band (8-12 Hz) arising in the lip reading task were associated with worse speech outcomes in both cochlear implant user groups. Taken together, results redress claims that cross-modal plasticity is maladaptive for speech outcomes and instead suggest that this relationship depends on the time point of testing, stage of sensory processing and likely the relevance of the stimulus for speech. In addition, findings form the basis for new neural markers that are predictive of cochlear implant users' long-term speech ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 1","pages":"fcaf071"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speech outcomes in cochlear implant users depend on visual cross-modal cortical activity measured before or after implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon T Paul, Vincent Trinh, Joseph Chen, Trung Le, Vincent Lin, Andrew Dimitrijevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cochlear implants can partially restore hearing function in deaf individuals, but long-term speech listening outcomes vary widely across cochlear implant users. Visual cross-modal plasticity, where auditory cortical neurons upregulate visual inputs to assist visual processing, is one factor proposed to worsen cochlear implant users' speech outcomes because it may limit auditory processing capability. However, evidence for this view is conflicting, and the relationship of cross-modal activity to speech perception may depend on other variables such as the type of visual activity and when it is assessed. To clarify, we measured visual cross-modal activity during a silent lip reading task using EEG in a cross-sectional, observational study. The study tested visual brain activation in 14 individuals prior to receiving a cochlear implant, 15 individuals tested at least 1 year after receiving and using a cochlear implant and 13 typical hearing controls who did not use a cochlear implant or hearing aid. Cross-modal responses to the onset of a visual event were positively correlated to speech outcomes in cochlear implant users tested after surgery but were negatively correlated in those tested prior to cochlear implant surgery. In addition, cross-modal increases in neural oscillatory power in the alpha band (8-12 Hz) arising in the lip reading task were associated with worse speech outcomes in both cochlear implant user groups. Taken together, results redress claims that cross-modal plasticity is maladaptive for speech outcomes and instead suggest that this relationship depends on the time point of testing, stage of sensory processing and likely the relevance of the stimulus for speech. In addition, findings form the basis for new neural markers that are predictive of cochlear implant users' long-term speech ability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain communications\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"fcaf071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851104/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Speech outcomes in cochlear implant users depend on visual cross-modal cortical activity measured before or after implantation.
Cochlear implants can partially restore hearing function in deaf individuals, but long-term speech listening outcomes vary widely across cochlear implant users. Visual cross-modal plasticity, where auditory cortical neurons upregulate visual inputs to assist visual processing, is one factor proposed to worsen cochlear implant users' speech outcomes because it may limit auditory processing capability. However, evidence for this view is conflicting, and the relationship of cross-modal activity to speech perception may depend on other variables such as the type of visual activity and when it is assessed. To clarify, we measured visual cross-modal activity during a silent lip reading task using EEG in a cross-sectional, observational study. The study tested visual brain activation in 14 individuals prior to receiving a cochlear implant, 15 individuals tested at least 1 year after receiving and using a cochlear implant and 13 typical hearing controls who did not use a cochlear implant or hearing aid. Cross-modal responses to the onset of a visual event were positively correlated to speech outcomes in cochlear implant users tested after surgery but were negatively correlated in those tested prior to cochlear implant surgery. In addition, cross-modal increases in neural oscillatory power in the alpha band (8-12 Hz) arising in the lip reading task were associated with worse speech outcomes in both cochlear implant user groups. Taken together, results redress claims that cross-modal plasticity is maladaptive for speech outcomes and instead suggest that this relationship depends on the time point of testing, stage of sensory processing and likely the relevance of the stimulus for speech. In addition, findings form the basis for new neural markers that are predictive of cochlear implant users' long-term speech ability.