锝-99m Tilmanocept与锝-99硫胶体放射性示踪剂在头颈部黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检中的比较。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sainiteesh Maddineni, Sofia M Tosoni, John B Sunwoo, Fred M Baik
{"title":"锝-99m Tilmanocept与锝-99硫胶体放射性示踪剂在头颈部黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检中的比较。","authors":"Sainiteesh Maddineni, Sofia M Tosoni, John B Sunwoo, Fred M Baik","doi":"10.1177/00034894251322661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is integral to management of head and neck melanomas (HNM). Here, we evaluate how radiotracer selection (Tc-99m tilmanocept or Tc-99m sulfur colloid) and imaging modality (planar imaging or single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT)) may influence SLNB and its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received SLNB for HNM at our institution between January 2000 and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 211 patients received Tc-99m tilmanocept (Tc-tilmanocept) and 113 received Tc-99m sulfur colloid (Tc-SC). There was no difference between Tc-tilmanocept and Tc-SC in terms of number of nodal levels to which the radiotracers localized (1.48 ± 0.93 SD vs 1.38 ± 0.93, respectively). Tc-tilmanocept had a lower rate of failed sentinel node identification as reported on radiology reports compared to Tc-SC (1.9% vs 11.5%, <i>P</i> < .001). There was a lower 5-year recurrence rate with Tc-tilmanocept versus Tc-SC (20.9% vs 28.3%, respectively <i>P</i> = .07), but this difference was not significant. When analyzing only cases in which SPECT was obtained, this there was no observed difference in 5-year recurrence rate. With SPECT, fewer patients had non-specific description of their node localization as \"cervical\" without further detailing of nodal basin (0% SPECT vs 9.7% non-SPECT, <i>P</i> < .001). Multivariable linear regression analysis for predictors of HNM 5-year recurrence found the odds ratio for SPECT imaging was 0.43, but not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tc-tilmanocept may be associated with greater rate of successful radiotracer migration along lymphatics compared to Tc-SC. SPECT imaging may confer more precision of the nodal basin to which radiotracer localizes as fewer patients receiving SPECT had radiology findings showing nonspecific localization of nodes to \"cervical\" basins without further specification. More patients are necessary to determine if Tc-tilmanocept and SPECT imaging are associated with lower melanoma recurrence rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"485-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Technetium-99m Tilmanocept to Technetium-99 Sulfur Colloid Radiotracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Sainiteesh Maddineni, Sofia M Tosoni, John B Sunwoo, Fred M Baik\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00034894251322661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is integral to management of head and neck melanomas (HNM). Here, we evaluate how radiotracer selection (Tc-99m tilmanocept or Tc-99m sulfur colloid) and imaging modality (planar imaging or single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT)) may influence SLNB and its outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received SLNB for HNM at our institution between January 2000 and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 211 patients received Tc-99m tilmanocept (Tc-tilmanocept) and 113 received Tc-99m sulfur colloid (Tc-SC). There was no difference between Tc-tilmanocept and Tc-SC in terms of number of nodal levels to which the radiotracers localized (1.48 ± 0.93 SD vs 1.38 ± 0.93, respectively). Tc-tilmanocept had a lower rate of failed sentinel node identification as reported on radiology reports compared to Tc-SC (1.9% vs 11.5%, <i>P</i> < .001). There was a lower 5-year recurrence rate with Tc-tilmanocept versus Tc-SC (20.9% vs 28.3%, respectively <i>P</i> = .07), but this difference was not significant. When analyzing only cases in which SPECT was obtained, this there was no observed difference in 5-year recurrence rate. With SPECT, fewer patients had non-specific description of their node localization as \\\"cervical\\\" without further detailing of nodal basin (0% SPECT vs 9.7% non-SPECT, <i>P</i> < .001). Multivariable linear regression analysis for predictors of HNM 5-year recurrence found the odds ratio for SPECT imaging was 0.43, but not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tc-tilmanocept may be associated with greater rate of successful radiotracer migration along lymphatics compared to Tc-SC. SPECT imaging may confer more precision of the nodal basin to which radiotracer localizes as fewer patients receiving SPECT had radiology findings showing nonspecific localization of nodes to \\\"cervical\\\" basins without further specification. More patients are necessary to determine if Tc-tilmanocept and SPECT imaging are associated with lower melanoma recurrence rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"485-492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251322661\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251322661","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)是头颈部黑色素瘤(HNM)治疗不可或缺的一部分。在这里,我们评估了放射性示踪剂的选择(Tc-99m tilmanocept或Tc-99m硫胶体)和成像方式(平面成像或单正电子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT))如何影响SLNB及其结果。方法:我们对我院2000年1月至2022年7月期间因HNM接受SLNB治疗的患者进行回顾性图表回顾。结果:211例患者使用Tc-99m tilmanocept (Tc-tilmanocept), 113例患者使用Tc-99m硫胶体(Tc-SC)。Tc-tilmanocept和Tc-SC在放射性示踪剂定位的淋巴结水平数量方面没有差异(分别为1.48±0.93 SD和1.38±0.93 SD)。放射学报告显示,Tc-tilmanocept与Tc-SC相比,前哨淋巴结识别失败率较低(1.9% vs 11.5%, P P = 0.07),但差异不显著。当仅分析获得SPECT的病例时,在5年复发率方面没有观察到差异。使用SPECT,较少的患者将其淋巴结定位描述为“宫颈”,而没有进一步详细描述淋巴结池(0% SPECT vs 9.7%非SPECT, P P = 0.06)。结论:与Tc-SC相比,Tc-tilmanocept可能与更高的放射性示踪剂沿淋巴的成功迁移率相关。SPECT成像可以更精确地确定放射性示踪剂定位的淋巴结盆,因为很少有接受SPECT的患者在没有进一步说明的情况下有非特异性淋巴结定位于“宫颈”盆。需要更多的患者来确定Tc-tilmanocept和SPECT成像是否与较低的黑色素瘤复发率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Technetium-99m Tilmanocept to Technetium-99 Sulfur Colloid Radiotracer for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma.

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is integral to management of head and neck melanomas (HNM). Here, we evaluate how radiotracer selection (Tc-99m tilmanocept or Tc-99m sulfur colloid) and imaging modality (planar imaging or single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT)) may influence SLNB and its outcomes.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received SLNB for HNM at our institution between January 2000 and July 2022.

Results: A total of 211 patients received Tc-99m tilmanocept (Tc-tilmanocept) and 113 received Tc-99m sulfur colloid (Tc-SC). There was no difference between Tc-tilmanocept and Tc-SC in terms of number of nodal levels to which the radiotracers localized (1.48 ± 0.93 SD vs 1.38 ± 0.93, respectively). Tc-tilmanocept had a lower rate of failed sentinel node identification as reported on radiology reports compared to Tc-SC (1.9% vs 11.5%, P < .001). There was a lower 5-year recurrence rate with Tc-tilmanocept versus Tc-SC (20.9% vs 28.3%, respectively P = .07), but this difference was not significant. When analyzing only cases in which SPECT was obtained, this there was no observed difference in 5-year recurrence rate. With SPECT, fewer patients had non-specific description of their node localization as "cervical" without further detailing of nodal basin (0% SPECT vs 9.7% non-SPECT, P < .001). Multivariable linear regression analysis for predictors of HNM 5-year recurrence found the odds ratio for SPECT imaging was 0.43, but not statistically significant (P = .06).

Conclusions: Tc-tilmanocept may be associated with greater rate of successful radiotracer migration along lymphatics compared to Tc-SC. SPECT imaging may confer more precision of the nodal basin to which radiotracer localizes as fewer patients receiving SPECT had radiology findings showing nonspecific localization of nodes to "cervical" basins without further specification. More patients are necessary to determine if Tc-tilmanocept and SPECT imaging are associated with lower melanoma recurrence rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信