心电图分析应用与即时超声筛查左心室功能障碍的非劣效性分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jin Hee Kim, Jae Yun Jung, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Eunkyoung Lee, Dahyeon Son
{"title":"心电图分析应用与即时超声筛查左心室功能障碍的非劣效性分析。","authors":"Jin Hee Kim, Jae Yun Jung, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Eunkyoung Lee, Dahyeon Son","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2024.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for heart function evaluation in emergency departments (EDs), but requires specific equipment and skilled operators. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile application for estimating left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] using electrocardiography (ECG) and tests its non-inferiority to POCUS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (aged ≥20 years) were included if they had both a POCUS-based EF evaluation and an ECG within 24 hours of their ED visit between January and May 2022, along with formal echocardiography within 2 weeks before or after the visit. A mobile app (ECG Buddy, EB) estimated LVEF (EF from EB) and the risk of LV dysfunction (LV-Dysfunction score) from ECG waveforms, which were compared to NT-proBNP levels and POCUS-evaluated LVEF (EF from POCUS). A non-inferiority margin was set at an area under the curve (AUC) difference of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 181 patients included, 37 (20.4%) exhibited LV dysfunction. The AUCs for screening LV dysfunction using POCUS and NT-proBNP were 0.885 and 0.822, respectively. EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score outperformed NT-proBNP, with AUCs of 0.893 and 0.884, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.017 and <i>p</i>=0.030, respectively). EF from EB was non-inferior to EF from POCUS, while LV-Dysfunction score narrowly missed the mark. A subgroup analysis of sinus-origin rhythm ECGs supported the non-inferiority of both EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score to EF from POCUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A smartphone application that analyzes ECG image can screen for LV dysfunction with a level of accuracy comparable to that of POCUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 3","pages":"172-178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Inferiority Analysis of Electrocardiography Analysis Application vs. Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Screening Left Ventricular Dysfunction.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Hee Kim, Jae Yun Jung, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Eunkyoung Lee, Dahyeon Son\",\"doi\":\"10.3349/ymj.2024.0148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for heart function evaluation in emergency departments (EDs), but requires specific equipment and skilled operators. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile application for estimating left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] using electrocardiography (ECG) and tests its non-inferiority to POCUS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (aged ≥20 years) were included if they had both a POCUS-based EF evaluation and an ECG within 24 hours of their ED visit between January and May 2022, along with formal echocardiography within 2 weeks before or after the visit. A mobile app (ECG Buddy, EB) estimated LVEF (EF from EB) and the risk of LV dysfunction (LV-Dysfunction score) from ECG waveforms, which were compared to NT-proBNP levels and POCUS-evaluated LVEF (EF from POCUS). A non-inferiority margin was set at an area under the curve (AUC) difference of 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 181 patients included, 37 (20.4%) exhibited LV dysfunction. The AUCs for screening LV dysfunction using POCUS and NT-proBNP were 0.885 and 0.822, respectively. EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score outperformed NT-proBNP, with AUCs of 0.893 and 0.884, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.017 and <i>p</i>=0.030, respectively). EF from EB was non-inferior to EF from POCUS, while LV-Dysfunction score narrowly missed the mark. A subgroup analysis of sinus-origin rhythm ECGs supported the non-inferiority of both EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score to EF from POCUS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A smartphone application that analyzes ECG image can screen for LV dysfunction with a level of accuracy comparable to that of POCUS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yonsei Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"172-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yonsei Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2024.0148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:即时超声(POCUS)在急诊科(ed)广泛用于心功能评估,但需要特定的设备和熟练的操作人员。本研究评估了用于估计左室(LV)收缩功能障碍[左室射血分数(LVEF)]的移动应用程序的诊断准确性。材料和方法:如果患者(年龄≥20岁)在2022年1月至5月ED就诊前24小时内进行了基于pocusf的EF评估和心电图检查,并在就诊前后2周内进行了正式的超声心动图检查,则纳入研究。一个移动应用程序(ECG Buddy, EB)从心电图波形中估计LVEF(来自EB的EF)和LV功能障碍风险(LV功能障碍评分),并将其与NT-proBNP水平和POCUS评估的LVEF(来自POCUS的EF)进行比较。非劣效性边界设为曲线下面积(AUC)差为0.05。结果:181例患者中,37例(20.4%)表现为左室功能障碍。POCUS和NT-proBNP筛查左室功能障碍的auc分别为0.885和0.822。EB EF和lv功能障碍评分优于NT-proBNP, auc分别为0.893和0.884 (p=0.017和p=0.030)。EB的EF不低于POCUS的EF,而lv功能障碍评分则略低于标准。窦源性心律心电图的亚组分析支持EB EF和lv功能障碍评分与POCUS EF的非劣效性。结论:智能手机应用程序分析心电图像可以筛查左室功能障碍,准确度与POCUS相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-Inferiority Analysis of Electrocardiography Analysis Application vs. Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Screening Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for heart function evaluation in emergency departments (EDs), but requires specific equipment and skilled operators. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile application for estimating left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] using electrocardiography (ECG) and tests its non-inferiority to POCUS.

Materials and methods: Patients (aged ≥20 years) were included if they had both a POCUS-based EF evaluation and an ECG within 24 hours of their ED visit between January and May 2022, along with formal echocardiography within 2 weeks before or after the visit. A mobile app (ECG Buddy, EB) estimated LVEF (EF from EB) and the risk of LV dysfunction (LV-Dysfunction score) from ECG waveforms, which were compared to NT-proBNP levels and POCUS-evaluated LVEF (EF from POCUS). A non-inferiority margin was set at an area under the curve (AUC) difference of 0.05.

Results: Of the 181 patients included, 37 (20.4%) exhibited LV dysfunction. The AUCs for screening LV dysfunction using POCUS and NT-proBNP were 0.885 and 0.822, respectively. EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score outperformed NT-proBNP, with AUCs of 0.893 and 0.884, respectively (p=0.017 and p=0.030, respectively). EF from EB was non-inferior to EF from POCUS, while LV-Dysfunction score narrowly missed the mark. A subgroup analysis of sinus-origin rhythm ECGs supported the non-inferiority of both EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score to EF from POCUS.

Conclusion: A smartphone application that analyzes ECG image can screen for LV dysfunction with a level of accuracy comparable to that of POCUS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信