颅咽管瘤辅助治疗方式对治疗结果的影响。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Byung Min Lee, Jaeho Cho, Dong-Seok Kim, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Eui-Hyun Kim, Ju Hyung Moon, Sung Soo Ahn, Yae Won Park, Chang-Ok Suh, Hong In Yoon
{"title":"颅咽管瘤辅助治疗方式对治疗结果的影响。","authors":"Byung Min Lee, Jaeho Cho, Dong-Seok Kim, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Eui-Hyun Kim, Ju Hyung Moon, Sung Soo Ahn, Yae Won Park, Chang-Ok Suh, Hong In Yoon","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2023.0566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adjuvant treatment for craniopharyngioma after surgery is controversial. Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can increase the risk of long-term sequelae. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used to reduce treatment-related toxicity. In this study, we compared the treatment outcomes and toxicities of adjuvant therapies for craniopharyngioma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed patients who underwent craniopharyngioma tumor removal between 2000 and 2017. Of the 153 patients, 27 and 20 received adjuvant fractionated EBRT and SRS, respectively. We compared the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival between groups that received adjuvant fractionated EBRT, SRS, and surveillance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period was 77.7 months. For SRS and surveillance, the 10-year LC was 57.2% and 57.4%, respectively. No local progression was observed after adjuvant fractionated EBRT. One patient in the adjuvant fractionated EBRT group died owing to glioma 94 months after receiving radiotherapy (10-year PFS: 80%). The 10-year PFS was 43.6% and 50.7% in the SRS and surveillance groups, respectively. The treatment outcomes significantly differed according to adjuvant treatment in non-gross total resection (GTR) patients. Additional treatment-related toxicity was comparable in the adjuvant fractionated EBRT and other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant fractionated EBRT could be effective in controlling local failure, especially in patients with non-GTR, while maintaining acceptable treatment-related toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"66 3","pages":"141-150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Treatment Outcomes Depending on the Adjuvant Treatment Modality in Craniopharyngioma.\",\"authors\":\"Byung Min Lee, Jaeho Cho, Dong-Seok Kim, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Eui-Hyun Kim, Ju Hyung Moon, Sung Soo Ahn, Yae Won Park, Chang-Ok Suh, Hong In Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.3349/ymj.2023.0566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adjuvant treatment for craniopharyngioma after surgery is controversial. Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can increase the risk of long-term sequelae. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used to reduce treatment-related toxicity. In this study, we compared the treatment outcomes and toxicities of adjuvant therapies for craniopharyngioma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed patients who underwent craniopharyngioma tumor removal between 2000 and 2017. Of the 153 patients, 27 and 20 received adjuvant fractionated EBRT and SRS, respectively. We compared the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival between groups that received adjuvant fractionated EBRT, SRS, and surveillance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period was 77.7 months. For SRS and surveillance, the 10-year LC was 57.2% and 57.4%, respectively. No local progression was observed after adjuvant fractionated EBRT. One patient in the adjuvant fractionated EBRT group died owing to glioma 94 months after receiving radiotherapy (10-year PFS: 80%). The 10-year PFS was 43.6% and 50.7% in the SRS and surveillance groups, respectively. The treatment outcomes significantly differed according to adjuvant treatment in non-gross total resection (GTR) patients. Additional treatment-related toxicity was comparable in the adjuvant fractionated EBRT and other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant fractionated EBRT could be effective in controlling local failure, especially in patients with non-GTR, while maintaining acceptable treatment-related toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yonsei Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"141-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865873/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yonsei Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0566\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:颅咽管瘤术后辅助治疗存在争议。辅助外束放射治疗(EBRT)可增加长期后遗症的风险。立体定向放射手术(SRS)用于减少治疗相关的毒性。在这项研究中,我们比较了辅助治疗颅咽管瘤的治疗结果和毒性。材料和方法:我们分析了2000年至2017年间接受颅咽管瘤肿瘤切除术的患者。153例患者中,分别有27例和20例患者接受了辅助分步EBRT和SRS治疗。我们比较了局部对照(LC)、无进展生存期(PFS)和接受辅助分级EBRT、SRS和监测组的总生存期。结果:中位随访时间为77.7个月。SRS和监测的10年LC分别为57.2%和57.4%。辅助分馏EBRT后未观察到局部进展。辅助分割EBRT组1例患者在放疗后94个月因胶质瘤死亡(10年PFS: 80%)。SRS组和监测组的10年PFS分别为43.6%和50.7%。非大体全切除(GTR)患者的辅助治疗效果有显著差异。额外的治疗相关毒性在辅助分馏EBRT和其他组中是相当的。结论:辅助分式EBRT可有效控制局部衰竭,特别是对非gtr患者,同时保持可接受的治疗相关毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Treatment Outcomes Depending on the Adjuvant Treatment Modality in Craniopharyngioma.

Purpose: Adjuvant treatment for craniopharyngioma after surgery is controversial. Adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can increase the risk of long-term sequelae. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used to reduce treatment-related toxicity. In this study, we compared the treatment outcomes and toxicities of adjuvant therapies for craniopharyngioma.

Materials and methods: We analyzed patients who underwent craniopharyngioma tumor removal between 2000 and 2017. Of the 153 patients, 27 and 20 received adjuvant fractionated EBRT and SRS, respectively. We compared the local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival between groups that received adjuvant fractionated EBRT, SRS, and surveillance.

Results: The median follow-up period was 77.7 months. For SRS and surveillance, the 10-year LC was 57.2% and 57.4%, respectively. No local progression was observed after adjuvant fractionated EBRT. One patient in the adjuvant fractionated EBRT group died owing to glioma 94 months after receiving radiotherapy (10-year PFS: 80%). The 10-year PFS was 43.6% and 50.7% in the SRS and surveillance groups, respectively. The treatment outcomes significantly differed according to adjuvant treatment in non-gross total resection (GTR) patients. Additional treatment-related toxicity was comparable in the adjuvant fractionated EBRT and other groups.

Conclusion: Adjuvant fractionated EBRT could be effective in controlling local failure, especially in patients with non-GTR, while maintaining acceptable treatment-related toxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信