使用或不使用皮质类固醇与仅使用皮质类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征:双盲随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1002/mus.28382
Sahar Ghorbanpour, Mina Abdi, Negin Naeemi, Sarvenaz Rahimibarghani, Maryam Hosseini, Seyede Zahra Emami Razavi, Mohaddeseh Azadvari
{"title":"使用或不使用皮质类固醇与仅使用皮质类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征:双盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Sahar Ghorbanpour, Mina Abdi, Negin Naeemi, Sarvenaz Rahimibarghani, Maryam Hosseini, Seyede Zahra Emami Razavi, Mohaddeseh Azadvari","doi":"10.1002/mus.28382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Hydrodissection is an emerging technique in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. We aimed to compare the efficacy of hydrodissection with or without corticosteroid versus intra-carpal corticosteroid injection for treating carpal tunnel syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 66 wrists with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome were allocated to three study arms. Under ultrasound guidance, patients received a single injection consisting of 1 mL (40 mg) triamcinolone acetonide, 1 mL lidocaine, and 3 mL of saline, or 1 mL lidocaine, and 4 mL saline. Another group received 1 mL intra-carpal triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg) without ultrasound guidance. All participants were followed for 3 months post-injection. The primary outcome was the median nerve cross-sectional area. Secondary outcomes were symptom severity, functional status, electrodiagnostic test results, hang grip, and pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses showed a significant reduction in symptom severity, improvement in function, decrease in median cross-sectional area, and improvement in electrodiagnostic evaluations for all the interventions 3 months after the injections (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant improvement in muscle strength with any of the interventions. Sensory distal latency decreased (p ≤ 0.004), and sensory nerve conduction velocity increased in all groups (p ≤ 0.001). For motor nerve evaluations, distal latency decreased significantly with the three interventions (p ≤ 0.003), while nerve conduction velocity in the forearm segment increased in the steroid-only group (p < 0.011). Group comparisons did not reveal any significant differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All interventions were effective in improving symptom severity, function, and electrodiagnostic and ultrasound measures, with no significant differences observed between the treatments.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered prospectively at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials website http://www.irct.ir/, a WHO Primary Register set up with the registration number IRCT20210613051566N1.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":"986-994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrodissection With or Without Corticosteroid Versus Corticosteroid-Only Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sahar Ghorbanpour, Mina Abdi, Negin Naeemi, Sarvenaz Rahimibarghani, Maryam Hosseini, Seyede Zahra Emami Razavi, Mohaddeseh Azadvari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mus.28382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Hydrodissection is an emerging technique in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. We aimed to compare the efficacy of hydrodissection with or without corticosteroid versus intra-carpal corticosteroid injection for treating carpal tunnel syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 66 wrists with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome were allocated to three study arms. Under ultrasound guidance, patients received a single injection consisting of 1 mL (40 mg) triamcinolone acetonide, 1 mL lidocaine, and 3 mL of saline, or 1 mL lidocaine, and 4 mL saline. Another group received 1 mL intra-carpal triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg) without ultrasound guidance. All participants were followed for 3 months post-injection. The primary outcome was the median nerve cross-sectional area. Secondary outcomes were symptom severity, functional status, electrodiagnostic test results, hang grip, and pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses showed a significant reduction in symptom severity, improvement in function, decrease in median cross-sectional area, and improvement in electrodiagnostic evaluations for all the interventions 3 months after the injections (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant improvement in muscle strength with any of the interventions. Sensory distal latency decreased (p ≤ 0.004), and sensory nerve conduction velocity increased in all groups (p ≤ 0.001). For motor nerve evaluations, distal latency decreased significantly with the three interventions (p ≤ 0.003), while nerve conduction velocity in the forearm segment increased in the steroid-only group (p < 0.011). Group comparisons did not reveal any significant differences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>All interventions were effective in improving symptom severity, function, and electrodiagnostic and ultrasound measures, with no significant differences observed between the treatments.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial was registered prospectively at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials website http://www.irct.ir/, a WHO Primary Register set up with the registration number IRCT20210613051566N1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"986-994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介/目的:水解剖术是治疗腕管综合征的一项新兴技术。我们的目的是比较水解剖加或不加皮质类固醇与腕内皮质类固醇注射治疗腕管综合征的疗效。方法:66例轻至中度腕管综合征患者被分为三个研究组。在超声引导下,患者接受单次注射:曲安奈德1ml (40mg)、利多卡因1ml、生理盐水3ml,或利多卡因1ml、生理盐水4ml。另一组在无超声引导下给予曲安奈德腕内注射1 mL (40 mg)。所有参与者注射后随访3个月。主要结果是正中神经横截面积。次要结局是症状严重程度、功能状态、电诊断试验结果、悬吊握力和疼痛。结果:分析显示,注射后3个月,所有干预措施的症状严重程度、功能改善、中位截面积减少、电诊断评估均有显著改善(均p)。讨论:所有干预措施在改善症状严重程度、功能、电诊断和超声测量方面均有效,治疗间无显著差异。试验注册:该试验已在伊朗临床试验注册网站http://www.irct.ir/进行前瞻性注册,该网站是世卫组织主要注册网站,注册号为IRCT20210613051566N1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hydrodissection With or Without Corticosteroid Versus Corticosteroid-Only Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction/aims: Hydrodissection is an emerging technique in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. We aimed to compare the efficacy of hydrodissection with or without corticosteroid versus intra-carpal corticosteroid injection for treating carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods: In total, 66 wrists with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome were allocated to three study arms. Under ultrasound guidance, patients received a single injection consisting of 1 mL (40 mg) triamcinolone acetonide, 1 mL lidocaine, and 3 mL of saline, or 1 mL lidocaine, and 4 mL saline. Another group received 1 mL intra-carpal triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg) without ultrasound guidance. All participants were followed for 3 months post-injection. The primary outcome was the median nerve cross-sectional area. Secondary outcomes were symptom severity, functional status, electrodiagnostic test results, hang grip, and pain.

Results: Analyses showed a significant reduction in symptom severity, improvement in function, decrease in median cross-sectional area, and improvement in electrodiagnostic evaluations for all the interventions 3 months after the injections (all p < 0.05). However, there was no significant improvement in muscle strength with any of the interventions. Sensory distal latency decreased (p ≤ 0.004), and sensory nerve conduction velocity increased in all groups (p ≤ 0.001). For motor nerve evaluations, distal latency decreased significantly with the three interventions (p ≤ 0.003), while nerve conduction velocity in the forearm segment increased in the steroid-only group (p < 0.011). Group comparisons did not reveal any significant differences.

Discussion: All interventions were effective in improving symptom severity, function, and electrodiagnostic and ultrasound measures, with no significant differences observed between the treatments.

Trial registration: The trial was registered prospectively at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials website http://www.irct.ir/, a WHO Primary Register set up with the registration number IRCT20210613051566N1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信