Takuro Washio, Ryosuke Takeda, Sarah L Hissen, John D Akins, Andrew W D'Souza, Denis J Wakeham, Tiffany Brazile, Kevin Lutz, Christopher M Hearon, James P MacNamara, Satyam Sarma, Benjamin D Levine, Paul J Fadel, Qi Fu
{"title":"保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者,静态握力运动维持交感神经反应,但降低升压反应。","authors":"Takuro Washio, Ryosuke Takeda, Sarah L Hissen, John D Akins, Andrew W D'Souza, Denis J Wakeham, Tiffany Brazile, Kevin Lutz, Christopher M Hearon, James P MacNamara, Satyam Sarma, Benjamin D Levine, Paul J Fadel, Qi Fu","doi":"10.1007/s10286-025-01114-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent studies have reported blunted increases in blood pressure (BP) during static handgrip (SHG) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be attributed to abnormal sympathetic reactivity during exercise and/or impaired muscle metaboreflex function. However, it is unknown whether the sympathetic neural response to SHG and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation via post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) are attenuated in HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients with HFpEF and 24 age-matched non-HFpEF controls were studied in the supine position. BP, heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during SHG at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction until fatigue followed by 2-min PECO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resting mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower and peak increase (Δ) in MAP was smaller in patients with HFpEF than in controls during SHG (Δ23 ± 15 [standard deviation] vs. Δ34 ± 15 mmHg; P = 0.007) and PECO (Δ15 ± 11 vs. Δ19 ± 9 mmHg; P = 0.047). HR was greater in patients at rest but did not differ between the two groups at peak SHG. Patients had higher resting MSNA burst frequency than controls (37 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 13 bursts/min; P = 0.031); however, burst incidence was not different between the groups (P = 0.226). There were no differences in MSNA responses to SHG (Δ19 ± 15 vs. Δ18 ± 10 bursts/min at peak; P = 0.841) or PECO (Δ3 ± 12 vs. Δ5 ± 7 bursts/min; P = 0.495) between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patients with HFpEF maintained sympathetic reactivity but had an attenuated pressor response during fatiguing SHG. Additionally, muscle metaboreflex activation of vasomotor sympathetic outflow appeared to be minimal in both groups, with no significant difference between patients and controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintained sympathetic reactivity but blunted pressor response to static handgrip exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.\",\"authors\":\"Takuro Washio, Ryosuke Takeda, Sarah L Hissen, John D Akins, Andrew W D'Souza, Denis J Wakeham, Tiffany Brazile, Kevin Lutz, Christopher M Hearon, James P MacNamara, Satyam Sarma, Benjamin D Levine, Paul J Fadel, Qi Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10286-025-01114-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recent studies have reported blunted increases in blood pressure (BP) during static handgrip (SHG) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be attributed to abnormal sympathetic reactivity during exercise and/or impaired muscle metaboreflex function. However, it is unknown whether the sympathetic neural response to SHG and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation via post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) are attenuated in HFpEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients with HFpEF and 24 age-matched non-HFpEF controls were studied in the supine position. BP, heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during SHG at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction until fatigue followed by 2-min PECO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resting mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower and peak increase (Δ) in MAP was smaller in patients with HFpEF than in controls during SHG (Δ23 ± 15 [standard deviation] vs. Δ34 ± 15 mmHg; P = 0.007) and PECO (Δ15 ± 11 vs. Δ19 ± 9 mmHg; P = 0.047). HR was greater in patients at rest but did not differ between the two groups at peak SHG. Patients had higher resting MSNA burst frequency than controls (37 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 13 bursts/min; P = 0.031); however, burst incidence was not different between the groups (P = 0.226). There were no differences in MSNA responses to SHG (Δ19 ± 15 vs. Δ18 ± 10 bursts/min at peak; P = 0.841) or PECO (Δ3 ± 12 vs. Δ5 ± 7 bursts/min; P = 0.495) between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The patients with HFpEF maintained sympathetic reactivity but had an attenuated pressor response during fatiguing SHG. Additionally, muscle metaboreflex activation of vasomotor sympathetic outflow appeared to be minimal in both groups, with no significant difference between patients and controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Autonomic Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Autonomic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-025-01114-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-025-01114-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:最近的研究报道了心力衰竭伴射血分数(HFpEF)患者在静握(SHG)期间血压(BP)的钝化升高,这可能归因于运动时交感神经反应异常和/或肌肉代谢反射功能受损。然而,在HFpEF中,交感神经对SHG的反应和通过运动后循环闭塞(PECO)激活的孤立肌肉代谢反射是否减弱尚不清楚。方法:采用仰卧位对39例HFpEF患者和24例年龄匹配的非HFpEF对照组进行研究。血压、心率(HR)和肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)在SHG期间测量,在最大自愿收缩的40%,直到疲劳,然后是2分钟PECO。结果:在SHG期间,HFpEF患者的静息平均动脉压(MAP)较低,MAP的峰值升高(Δ)小于对照组(Δ23±15[标准差]vs. Δ34±15 mmHg;P = 0.007)和PECO (Δ15±11 vs. Δ19±9 mmHg;p = 0.047)。静息时患者心率更高,但在SHG峰值时两组间无差异。患者静息时MSNA爆发频率高于对照组(37±14 vs 27±13);p = 0.031);两组间爆发发生率无显著差异(P = 0.226)。MSNA对SHG的反应无差异(峰值Δ19±15 vs Δ18±10次/分钟);P = 0.841)或PECO(Δ3±12与Δ5±7暴/分钟;P = 0.495)。结论:在疲劳SHG过程中,HFpEF患者维持交感神经反应,但血压反应减弱。此外,血管舒缩性交感神经流出的肌肉代谢反射激活在两组中似乎是最小的,在患者和对照组之间没有显著差异。
Maintained sympathetic reactivity but blunted pressor response to static handgrip exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Purpose: Recent studies have reported blunted increases in blood pressure (BP) during static handgrip (SHG) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which may be attributed to abnormal sympathetic reactivity during exercise and/or impaired muscle metaboreflex function. However, it is unknown whether the sympathetic neural response to SHG and isolated muscle metaboreflex activation via post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) are attenuated in HFpEF.
Methods: Thirty-nine patients with HFpEF and 24 age-matched non-HFpEF controls were studied in the supine position. BP, heart rate (HR), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during SHG at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction until fatigue followed by 2-min PECO.
Results: Resting mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower and peak increase (Δ) in MAP was smaller in patients with HFpEF than in controls during SHG (Δ23 ± 15 [standard deviation] vs. Δ34 ± 15 mmHg; P = 0.007) and PECO (Δ15 ± 11 vs. Δ19 ± 9 mmHg; P = 0.047). HR was greater in patients at rest but did not differ between the two groups at peak SHG. Patients had higher resting MSNA burst frequency than controls (37 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 13 bursts/min; P = 0.031); however, burst incidence was not different between the groups (P = 0.226). There were no differences in MSNA responses to SHG (Δ19 ± 15 vs. Δ18 ± 10 bursts/min at peak; P = 0.841) or PECO (Δ3 ± 12 vs. Δ5 ± 7 bursts/min; P = 0.495) between groups.
Conclusion: The patients with HFpEF maintained sympathetic reactivity but had an attenuated pressor response during fatiguing SHG. Additionally, muscle metaboreflex activation of vasomotor sympathetic outflow appeared to be minimal in both groups, with no significant difference between patients and controls.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease.
This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.